Motorola W220 - user opinions and reviews
Voting results
- Design
-
7.4
- Features
-
6.3
- Performance
-
6.7
- Votes:
- 2814
- Hits:
- 1126768
- bouraou
- Report
stupid phone.the 4096 color time is over,over,and OVER!!!! 10 yaers ago....
- Reply
- 2006-03-05 12:24
- mwxg
- U
- armin
- Report
Good move
Nice phone for older or country people.I think it can sell good.
- Reply
- 2006-03-05 07:52
- yZy3
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
what a crap phone. the only people who ar egoing to buy this paper wieght is if they no nothing about phones and wants to buy somethning cheap
- Reply
- 2006-03-04 04:16
- U2$S
- U
- PeTa
- Report
Wow...this phone is SICK to bad motorola forgot to add EVERYTHING.Wheres the camera,MP3 player,
wheres EVERYTHING its all gone LOL i tink motorola was to lazy to finish this phone off o well.
- Reply
- 2006-03-04 01:11
- 4ted
- U
- ahv
- Report
s far s mobiles r concerned, a fon like d w220 is adequate fo mi. inclood a vga n mayb blututh vud excellent it. d batterry life should b quide long 2 in addition to 5mb of internal mem.
- Reply
- 2006-03-01 11:07
- ibjX
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Gheee what a negative attitude in here...
Sure it's for another segment than phones packed with more or less useless features.
It could be kids, but maybe elderly people also would prefer a phone without a lot of stuff they dont use. Has anyone tried it? Is the user interface as simple as the features??
The keypad has large contrast, the 4K display may have been choosen for contrast??
Again, has anyone tried it?
- Reply
- 2006-02-28 02:10
- iAfC
- U
- vido_fighter
- Report
this is more then just design this is 4 people who don't have anough money 4 better fhone's i'm happy to see brands give thos people the chance to buy a good loking cheap phone!!!
- Reply
- 2006-02-24 19:04
- iJfF
- U
- cube
- Report
It seems that Motorola has changed their mission statement and key objectives; it appears that they are more interested in the low end to mid range market than anything else. The proof is the fact that they are producing mostly low end fashion (absolutely gorgeous) phones with little real functionality. Look at all the scrapped projects in this catalogue.
Pity, as I want to own a Motorola again...
- Reply
- 2006-02-24 17:28
- NHLS
- U
- Cube
- Report
Reminds me of gadgets used in the Star trek movies. I like it, though, it should be considered as an extreme budget flip phone.
- Reply
- 2006-02-24 17:11
- NHLS
- U
- TC 14
- Report
aaw cute a baby V3
or cheap v3
i like the way it looks but i wold buy this baby if i did not have my moto c650
- Reply
- 2006-02-22 20:59
- Nxsf
- U
- OA
- Report
wats in it???
motorola also removed the old things from this cell!!
hahaha cell for babies!!
- Reply
- 2006-02-22 07:53
- PZ%e
- U
- Kal
- Report
Thanks Nobra.
Yep Just checked Alcalet models. They have been using the icon thing on front for quite some time now.
- Reply
- 2006-02-21 20:39
- jc}9
- U
- nobra
- Report
is it so expansiv to use a 65k colour display instate of a cheap 4k?
+ the symbols on the front cover are copied from alcatel..
no matter i like the style its seems to be a nice quality good lookin basic phone
- Reply
- 2006-02-21 19:55
- mTc4
- U
- noor jamal
- Report
this is a joke of a cell phone right and i am already laughing my A$$ OFFFFF HAHAHAHAHA.Motorola has failed however motorola proudly announces that this sell phone will be available for cheapos,weirdos and selfish foolish business type people who dont allow cameras and other gr8 feauters and think that anybody will spy on their business and also this phone is great for cheapos and weirdos who can con people into thinking that "OOOH LOOK ITS MOTO V3X"(from far away) but when u get a closer look or when u have it in ur hands these poor souls i already feel sorry for them have this piece of crap in their hands they'll all be ashamed and disgraced and i hope really hope that they throw it into the owners face breakingboth the mobile and make a bloody mess out of the owner aswell OOOOOUCHHHHHH :D
- Reply
- 2006-02-21 18:36
- PEZp
- U
- Lami
- Report
Levi, this toy is 16.7 mm compared to the razr's 13.9 mm! Oh and without a quarter of the specs.. I don;t see where ultra slim fits in.
And for those that claim this phone is for what we see as developing/3 world countries. I can;t help but not butt in on that. I've been to many places around the world, from Indonesia to africa to South America and seen many developing countries, and believe it or not, when it comes to the cell phone industry they are no short of advanced technology. Most of these soo claimed 3rd world countries we talk about have 3G survice available, when I am here (speaking for myself only) in US and Canada crying of 3G yet our survice does not support it. Ironic..
Though this phone is targeted to the very young market as i see it. Give it to your 12 year old son/daughter to stay intouch with them or whatever.. something of that sort i guess.. And simply to whoever is cheap on cells would get it..
that's my 2 cent..
- Reply
- 2006-02-21 15:28
- QZk5
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed