Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus review: Aces wild
Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III review: S to the thirdMotorola W220 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.6
- Features
-
6.5
- Performance
-
6.8
- linkin
- Report
- 0
so the point is to make a simple phone. u got it Moto, it is simple. but hey, simple and crappy, do they have any thing in common? change design not the standard, learn your lesson yet?
- Reply
- 2006-02-15 19:19
- THwV
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Pretty sure this phone is for emerging markets, hence the lack of features like a camera.
- Reply
- 2006-02-15 18:47
- xivU
- U
- noname
- Report
- 0
I think this is good design, bad features and bad performance. What happen with you ??? very bad.....
- Reply
- 2006-02-15 15:52
- UDQx
- U
- Lami
- Report
- 0
In no way can you compare this with the nokia 3100. I get what you're trying to say, but first off nokia 3100 is old and still got a heap lot more features than this. I know it is a low end, and if you want something more you'd go for V3 series. It's just they could have at least added something to this phone other than press to speak and press to hang up. I mean c'mon now people, we are in 2006 cell been out since early '90.. This is a joke even for a low end phone!
- Reply
- 2006-02-15 14:52
- QZk5
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Fu guy.. this is low end phone.. Like Nokia 3100 and SE J series.. The design is better than SE's Z200
- Reply
- 2006-02-15 04:22
- F4pr
- U
- BEDZ
- Report
- 0
lmao @ this, they should cancel it, look what happened to the E1, incorporate radio in other models.
- Reply
- 2006-02-15 03:07
- iL%H
- U
- Zed
- Report
- 0
Yeah, you'd think they'd try to make something impressive for 2006... apparently not
- Reply
- 2006-02-15 00:55
- myx0
- U
- Diego
- Report
- 0
It's only a Low-Profile Phone, cheap and asessible than other Motorola, if you want full high profile Phone, see the ROKR E2!
- Reply
- 2006-02-14 20:56
- Pw3S
- U
