Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III review: S to the third
Samsung Galaxy S II ICS review: Sugar coatedMotorola W360 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
5.7
- Features
-
5.6
- Performance
-
5.6
- ralfeus
- Report
- 0
I really don't think a lot of people who posted their comments here have figured out that the W-series for Moto is for entry-level handsets with less frills and more for basic cellphone functionalities, that's why they have the L,K and V series for more upscale features...it would be kinda stupid to produce different models with all the same features right?
- Reply
- 2007-04-15 15:32
- PT}K
- U
- mrs garner
- Report
- 0
another fine classic from this asian group again
.and more cash left in your handbag without all the thrills .
- Reply
- 2007-04-04 22:58
- pwau
- U
- Thio
- Report
- 0
+ :
.4 band
.tft
.mp3
- :
.only 5 mb mem
.no irda
.no bt
? :
the price
the battery standby time
- Reply
- 2007-04-01 04:57
- ijna
- U
- abc
- Report
- 0
All motorola designer is old man.... old design, old features... i think all motorola designer should move to cave and stay inside there...
- Reply
- 2007-03-31 07:29
- ijna
- U
- Josh
- Report
- 0
yhese is not after the Z8 or the L9, W360 is again: FOR PEOPLE WITH LOW INCOME! Is it now clear you canīt compare this to the Z8 please!
- Reply
- 2007-03-30 01:08
- N9xG
- U
- moto lover
- Report
- 0
hahaha this is the most stupid fone ever, LoL I bet yall my 6 yr old brotha can use it without reading the manual
- Reply
- 2007-03-29 14:52
- NMam
- U
- Riz
- Report
- 0
Unfortunately there is no connectivity facility: irda or bt
- Reply
- 2007-03-29 05:51
- ijna
- U
- Josh
- Report
- 0
Those comments like boring or whatever makes me .. letīs say anxious , because again THESE ARE AFFORDABLE PHONES, i will repeat these again and again come on, get the point!
- Reply
- 2007-03-29 02:20
- N952
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Guys, first understand one thing; these are all sub $100 hand sets. Now tell me which Nokia/SE phone under $100 has comparable features!
- Reply
- 2007-03-28 18:03
- Uqse
- U
- George
- Report
- 0
Ugly, bad specs, too heavy for low-end, this deserves 2
Bad move Moto
- Reply
- 2007-03-28 17:43
- PdCN
- U
- muie
- Report
- 0
Ugly phone, ugly features, ugly screen...GIZAS we are in 2007! vga cam and that poor resolution? Motorola wake up dammit...!!!
- Reply
- 2007-03-28 13:02
- mAWY
- U
