Motorola W375 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Voting results
- Design
-
6.9
- Features
-
6.1
- Performance
-
6.3
- Votes:
- 2662
- Hits:
- 1028084
- Anonymous
- Report
Good peeps don't be fooled by the design, Motorola makes has very bad quality phones which is why they're pushing their phones with the help of the design. They hope people will buy on looks and gimmicks not on functionality - whichs seems to work very well as. If you want the *best* quality stick with Sony Ericsson or Samsung, not even Nokia reaches their level.
- Reply
- 2006-07-15 19:18
- mvav
- U
- siddhesh
- Report
it is really a good cell...
i hope it comes in the market as soon as possible so that i can buy it....
- Reply
- 2006-07-09 16:21
- 2@qD
- U
- gertrude
- Report
yes i believe this is the new face of motorola and i love it
- Reply
- 2006-07-06 07:18
- PP$8
- U
- Augusto Rocha
- Report
Why????
Why????
Motorola
No Bluetooh
No creo!
Very beautiful, but without bluetooh, aren't wireless conections.....
- Reply
- 2006-07-05 14:53
- P4sc
- U
- Marko Altomonte
- Report
eew! wat kind of fone is this? 1.5 mb? wat can u put with that? MP3 player will be totally useless. not a good shot from motorola
- Reply
- 2006-07-05 09:26
- PSv8
- U
- Dylan M
- Report
I think it's a very cool phone and I would defiantly buy one!!
- Reply
- 2006-07-03 04:11
- j@Jn
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
lately motorola only cares about the market share, they are selling crappy phones with nice design (eye catching) with super low ends features with the price of this phone you can get all this features and much more.
- Reply
- 2006-07-01 04:52
- Pv9c
- U
- simon
- Report
maybe motorola should start thinking more about what people expect from a phone even a level entry phone rather than what colour razr they can knock out next,the razr was once cutting edge but now they are flogging a dead horse and the days of taking out your razr for the wow factor are long gone.this new phone maybe a level entry effort but come on even my granny uses bluetooth.
- Reply
- 2006-07-01 02:12
- n1nL
- U
- Makaulius
- Report
EDGE-No;3G-No;WLAN-No;Bluetooth-No;Infrared port-No...Sad :(
- Reply
- 2006-06-30 06:17
- Svfy
- U
- Tai
- Report
OMG! this thing is shadow of the RAZR, what a crappy upgrade from moto!
- Reply
- 2006-06-29 16:09
- my56
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
ha ha ha ha ha its not bad for old people and radio listeners so i think youall should look at the better feature if u want to comment on a phone p.ss off and look at a more technical ffs
- Reply
- 2006-06-28 21:23
- iIR0
- U
- Kal
- Report
This is a basic lebel phone.Fine. Then what WAS W220? It took then 6 months to come up with another basic lebel phone??
Moto designers simply cant think of anything other than RAZR. The design says it all. They need to know its a old desing and people are bored to see the same thing again and again.
- Reply
- 2006-06-28 08:05
- 4pAm
- U
- sonrep29
- Report
this isnt the follow-up to the razr, this phone is different than the canary, this is just a low end phone that motorola put out for people who want good looking phones but dont have millions of dollars to pay phone there high end phones. for its price the phone is awesome
- Reply
- 2006-06-28 05:19
- 43iU
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
oh my god..i can't believe it...motorola dissapointed me....the design gets better and better but what can we do with a beautiful cell good for nothing?
- Reply
- 2006-06-27 16:51
- i8uw
- U
- BeeBo
- Report
So This is the replacement for the RAZR?! AHHHH what were they thinking this thing blOWs nUtS, why give v3i a 1.3 mp camera and downgrade to VGA!? Also no bluetooth! RAZR v3 had 5mb memory, v3i had 10 mb this has 1.5MB!! AhHHh! nO eXpAndABle mEMOry eiTHeR or color external display!! This is meant to be progress WTF! Man, Moto used to be good now they're just not trying
- Reply
- 2006-06-27 15:38
- my56
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed