Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.8
- Features
-
6.1
- Performance
-
6.2
- Sebastian
- Report
@rendy:
The first V3 was launched before than v360.
This phone doesn´t have bluetooth because is a low end, is a cheap Razr.
- Reply
- 2006-10-29 05:58
- iBtv
- U
- rendy
- Report
Oh! one more thing. V3 does not use a memory card but v360 does. Bear in mind that V3 is the latest compare to V360. Now What is the meaning of this. (to fully understand what I'm talking about read all my posts, start from the 3rd one and back to this one. The are all in line).
- Reply
- 2006-10-22 17:54
- C{xZ
- U
- rendy
- Report
Motorola really knows style. Their phones are so stylish. I give you a hand for style, keep it up.
But most of their phones have similar features. One other thing is that they produce phones like this: they might make new phone with a new nice feature, the next time they'll make a new phone which is very stylish but has boring features similar to those of a phone they once made a long time ago. I was very dissappointed to find that V3 does not have a video camera whilst V360 does, and hence V3 was made after V360. Guys, tell me if I'm wrong.
- Reply
- 2006-10-22 17:43
- C{xZ
- U
- rendy
- Report
I love motorola but there is one thing I do not like. Their phones go in reverse, I hope you feel me. For example, almost all motorola phones produced nowadays have bluetooth but this one doesn't. What do you call that guys? This is reverse,I mean, A phone without bluetool is a thing of the past.
- Reply
- 2006-10-22 17:22
- C{xZ
- U
- Ilyasuddin Sayed
- Report
looks good but whats the use of camera and the usb and mp3 without memory and that too only 1.5mb thats enough for one customised pic of mine.
- Reply
- 2006-10-13 20:15
- TSLq
- U
- mithushad
- Report
this model also same like razr,can u pls make something small, handy flip phones,like pebl, more slimmer than pebl but not same look.about this model i like the features to compitates other brands. i hope the price will be less. if it is more than $110 very very difficult to sale
- Reply
- 2006-10-09 10:48
- SkE9
- U
- nick
- Report
if you want a basic phone like this, why cant u just get a earlier model? not rocket science, and yes i think motorola are wasting their time.
i have a v3x btw, gr8 fone
- Reply
- 2006-08-27 18:53
- mHdx
- U
- Adam W
- Report
Whats the point in offering MP3 as ringtones when the memory is only 1.5 meg???
- Reply
- 2006-08-19 18:40
- M3s@
- U
- KICH
- Report
V3 design for the low end market, seems quality will have to suffer.
- Reply
- 2006-07-26 15:39
- Rn@h
- U
- girlyoutloud
- Report
Not every people need a high tech phone...and high tech phone more expensive...!! so why bother ??
- Reply
- 2006-07-25 06:08
- TVW%
- U
- vsvf
- Report
Err, i like the w375's design better than d w208 n i believe the quality's just s good...
- Reply
- 2006-07-22 04:50
- ibjp
- U
- Sebastian
- Report
I think this phone is ideal for women: good design without complicated features. :)
- Reply
- 2006-07-21 03:52
- iBtv
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
motorola's concentrating on design not on functionality. all they want is to make their product more affordable. nokia's phone concentrate on functionality hence their phones are far more expensive. get a grip guys.
- Reply
- 2006-07-20 17:02
- P@dk
- U
- jaiden philmcrack
- Report
how ugly does it get and mine has serious problems the alarm dosen't shut up and the camera doesn't work propely geez i should of got the nokia one .This mobile peoples i don't recommend for you!it sucks =(
- Reply
- 2006-07-20 12:23
- UipP
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.


RSS feed