Motorola W375 - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.8
- Features
-
6.1
- Performance
-
6.2
- Victor
- Report
Motorola should stop making antiquated fones. Even a C650 is better than this. Hope they release this fone with a very low price to compensate.
- Reply
- 2006-06-25 17:47
- P6Zr
- U
- star
- Report
I am very excited to see a low budget phone that has good funcionality, i mean it has a good design obviously it wont be as advanced as say the razr, but it also won't cost as much- I think for the money it will be a great product, also i am in love with the exteral display alteration! could use the time too though. :(
- Reply
- 2006-06-24 21:15
- 4v04
- U
- don69
- Report
hey...hey...if it's gonna cost me 50 USD i'll probably buy it. If it's not well...it's probably just waste of money. Same goes to the other so called cheap model!
- Reply
- 2006-06-24 20:20
- PFDN
- U
- zishiii
- Report
hummmm. motorolla phones are so featureless.... u know motorolla's office callender is of 20th century...any body can tell them that this is not 20th century it 21st........
- Reply
- 2006-06-24 09:06
- ijpg
- U
- e;l
- Report
this fone is really ugl ure correct motorola av w\aasted money who the hell invented this????
- Reply
- 2006-06-23 18:03
- nTqi
- U
- heydeho
- Report
Why waste your money Motorola. What a 2004 mobile phone you have released. Get with the current market, and go back to the futuristic drawing board or dont bother at all. The general public aren't as stupid as you might think.
- Reply
- 2006-06-23 15:34
- impF
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
this fone should come out as buy 1 and get 1 free. for eg. buy a razr n get this one for free? that would be good marketing for saling razr quick! get an idea! :D
- Reply
- 2006-06-23 15:03
- PGDq
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
nicely fit in 1.5mb memory into the phone with no card slot! well done moto!! very impressive!! XD
- Reply
- 2006-06-23 14:59
- PGDq
- U
- Santosh Mudaliar
- Report
Such a great phone.I wish I could own one.Plz tell me whats the price of the phone and the features.I was never so desperate to buy such a phone in my entire life.
- Reply
- 2006-06-23 14:55
- P$0f
- U
- Nasir Hussain
- Report
I have never come across such a cheap phone performance wise.If u look the other way,the design and the looks it looks great.Anyways whats the cost of the phone.It shouldnt be more than 4 grans.
- Reply
- 2006-06-23 14:50
- P$0f
- U
- Faisel
- Report
I think this is the phone they were on about on engadgetmobile.com, the Motorola RAZR 2, the Canary!
- Reply
- 2006-06-23 13:57
- MMyL
- U
- Kal
- Report
Nothing to say...Moto needs to get over the razr design and do something new.
They are making it very clear to everyone that they are running out of ideas.
- Reply
- 2006-06-23 07:02
- 4p5b
- U
- Mariano
- Report
Nice design, good move with the fm radio. Only 100 contacts? Come on! Camera is useless. Better would be without it and instead add bluetooth and at least 5mb (only 1.5 thats less than SE t616!).
I think the phone is triband. The SO isn't JUIX or linux based??? And I like the icon based subdisplay (smart and practical idea).
Greetings from Argentina!!!
- Reply
- 2006-06-23 05:26
- PdED
- U
- Master_Ryu
- Report
Its a dual Band? Only 640x480 VGA Camera? Well what a step backwards for Motorola. Pretty ghastly colors too in my opinion. This is obviously an entry level handset, wonder what the price is going to be?
- Reply
- 2006-06-23 03:14
- PP@6
- U
- muambadin
- Report
oh dude i got a motorola phone and i dont know why motorola is not releasing good phones. nokia, sony ericsson and samsung is going to devour motorola
- Reply
- 2006-06-23 03:00
- PjCV
- U
- 3 LiCKS 'N 1 BiTE
- Report
this looks like a worthless fone... no bluetooth, infrared, edge or 3g.
- Reply
- 2006-06-23 02:00
- 48LD
- U
- vinay
- Report
i think motorola comparatively better in servicing and original parts
- Reply
- 2006-06-22 22:47
- ijV7
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed