Samsung Galaxy Ace Plus review: Aces wild
Sony Xperia S review: NXT of kinMotorola W380 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
5.3
- Features
-
5.1
- Performance
-
5.2
- Ex_Moto_Luver
- Report
- 0
Oh yeah! Try looking into China's home brands. I bet their new phones are better than this!! Come on, entry phones in China need to have blue tooth & MP3/MP4 compatible. So if you wanna talk about the high tier phones? Does Motorola have any that you can be proud of? Personally, I felt that Motorola's peripheral design is excellent but the firmware is way sux..
- Reply
- 2007-03-31 13:47
- F4pr
- U
- Mark_S
- Report
- 0
Tracfone is using the W370 which is this phone without the external display.
- Reply
- 2007-03-30 07:36
- kcTx
- U
- Josh
- Report
- 0
yes I understand the Razr look is getting boring, I´ve faith in motorola through the years motorola always amazes me with the design of phones will see what´s next But yes in some way you are right the design of the RAZR is not good, Motorola can make a better job, changing now the design, it is time, but I´ll wait besides these phones look like the RAZR because now the people with low low income can have something that looks nice I know is an strategy.
- Reply
- 2007-03-30 01:06
- N9xG
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Oh man, you look doesn't understand. Which Motorola mobile for Entry Level, Low Level, Middle Level and High Level. "Motorola W380" is for Low Level, i think the price is lower than US$100. Can you find any new mobile for "Low Level" with bluetooth? Motorola V3 Razr and Motorola E398 is for Middle Level.
If you want "Motorola" with bluetooth, just buy other "Motorola" with bluetooth. Like "Motorola L6". Poor people doesn't need "bluetooth" and maybe they doesn't know how to use "bluetooth". The important for poor people just can has mobile for communication.
- Reply
- 2007-03-29 15:59
- PDLx
- U
- moto lover
- Report
- 0
oh and no bluetooth even the cheapo E398(now) has it!! Everyone know's where in the 21st century, no one lives in stoneage anymore, believe me even my 6 year old brother knows what a bluetooth is, I think he would bother ask his mother to buy this crap
- Reply
- 2007-03-29 14:48
- NMam
- U
- moto lover
- Report
- 0
Motorola could make affordable fones but plz come up with other styles, man RAZR is SOOOOOOOOOOO history, I mean what's the big diff between this fone and V3, oh more space! WOW i'm amazed, everyone could afford an original V3 now
- Reply
- 2007-03-29 14:45
- NMam
- U
- Josh
- Report
- 0
Those comments like boring or whatever makes me .. let´s say anxious , because again THESE ARE AFFORDABLE PHONES, i will repeat these again and again come on, get the point!
- Reply
- 2007-03-29 02:19
- N952
- U
- MotoFan
- Report
- 0
Guys, first understand one thing; these are all sub $100 hand sets. Now tell me which Nokia/SE phone under $100 has comparable features!
- Reply
- 2007-03-28 18:03
- Uqse
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
===============================================
To: George
This phone deserves zero. Another RAZR. B-O-R-I-N-G
===============================================
It's better than copy from other brand design. "Motorola" design with own design. The fact is "Motorola" make customer satisfaction.
- Reply
- 2007-03-28 17:50
- PDLx
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
===============================================
To: 2CJA
The Z310 looks and has better specifications and these are both the same price range.
===============================================
Same price range is not same price. If better, why not to be success like "Motorola V3 Razr" with basic features?
- Reply
- 2007-03-28 14:07
- PDLx
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
The Z310 looks and has better specifications and these are both the same price range.
- Reply
- 2007-03-28 12:40
- 2CJA
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
===============================================
To: moto lover
OMG!! motorola is getting out of ideas, wake up moto!!
===============================================
OMG!!! One more people has Blind about Motorola!!!
- Reply
- 2007-03-28 12:04
- PDLx
- U
