Motorola W510 - user opinions and reviews

• huh?
• Report
• Rating0

what's wrong with the w5xx model? trying to sound like sony?

• Reply
• 2007-02-17 17:05
• P@cQ
• U

• lukman
• Report
• Rating0

great design, good lookin, but, no FM radio, what a dissapointment decision from motorola manufacturer cause im one of big fans of motorola. Lukman, desa kendal, Punung, Pacitan, Jatim.

• Reply
• 2007-02-16 12:54
• in@L
• U

• alpha
• Report
• Rating0

when will moto grow out of this RAZAR bullcrap

get some freakin new designs and good specs for a change , like who the F@#k gives 80 sms storage capacity in 2007 , leave other luxuries like good browser user interface and battery

get lost motorola and get a life stop leeching customers with overpriced good for nothing cellphones

well that explains why moto is seen mostly wid blonds .... lolz

• Reply
• 2007-02-15 16:44
• PTnJ
• U

• Anonymous
• Report
• Rating0

I think the phone is nice for a mid range line
I'm thinking that maybe low end will have vga cameras and mid range will have 1.3megapixel...perhaps that's what motorola is trying to achieve
But I'm pretty sure that phone will be so overpriced, at least in my country.
Motorola Rizr K1 cost 500$USD, and Sony ericsson W810 and Nokia 5300 are at 350$USD and they both bring more stuff than Rizr K1.

• Reply
• 2007-02-15 05:23
• P1LE
• U

• simon
• Report
• Rating0

very poor indeed this is a spec of a 3year old phone, get a grip motto.

• Reply
• 2007-02-13 21:48
• n14i
• U

• bishop Nii
• Report
• Rating0

A very good fon..great design..thumbs up Motorola ..u have proven that u are the pioneers in the mobile industry

• Reply
• 2007-02-13 13:21
• ftMC
• U