Motorola WX160 - user opinions and reviews

Motorola

Popularity

Daily interest
  N/A
Total hits:
92076

Voting results

Design
7.1
Features
6.8
Performance
6.9
Votes:
11


Sort by:

itzz a wonderful basic 4n coz it just hav evry thing u need for a handy MOBILE PHONE...!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2010-04-15 13:38
  • tevh
  • U

the phone book number only can put 100 number ?

  • Reply
  • 2010-04-12 05:32
  • uC3R
  • Q

> In reply to Allah dino Khan Bhay @ 2010-02-11 10:24 from IaHi - click to readThe instructions are rubbish, this is the first motorola phone I bought and can't get predictive text on. Does anyone have instruction on how to use predictive text?
TIA Alan

  • Reply
  • 2010-03-14 16:22
  • 0FkE
  • Q

hi, just interested in the battery life. how long until it needs to be recharged after little or no use and how long does it take to charge. thank you. rick.

  • Reply
  • 2010-03-10 03:35
  • wgIU
  • Q

ahhhhhhhhhhhhh.....guys its its best phone. i bought it and m very happy with it.

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-20 19:29
  • uWyn
  • H
  • Allah dino Khan Bhay
  • Report
  • Rating0

it is a very good mobile phone, I purchased it and happy

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-11 10:24
  • IaHi
  • U

> In reply to rahman @ 2009-11-19 11:21 from wrqq - click to readI was just going to say that. Looks totally good for a cheap phone. Sleek and serious, not like a toy.

  • Reply
  • 2009-12-23 19:43
  • Mtr2
  • R

Reasonable price with additional FM radio and hand-free too. Great value.

  • Reply
  • 2009-12-23 10:53
  • vtKy
  • H

good

  • Reply
  • 2009-12-14 07:59
  • tU32
  • Q

its slim and nice but the features are so bare...i think Motorola is targeting at no-frill market.

  • Reply
  • 2009-12-04 07:51
  • jiWR
  • U

nice design...sleek,slim,ouval..

  • Reply
  • 2009-11-19 11:21
  • wrqq
  • C

marketing strategies yah know. for me moto is one of the best when it comes to innovation. they are producing low end fones for those who can't afford. everyone has all the rights to use a moto fone anyways...

  • Reply
  • 2009-11-02 05:35
  • tWiH
  • U

I bought it for 3,490 Philppine peso. (ALCATEL OT-i650)

Its battery indicator has
3 bars.

The phone lost one bar after 2 days
of heavy texting. No calls.

The phone lost one bar after
3 days if i turn the antenna off mode.
Heavy txting no calls.


  • Reply
  • 2009-11-01 19:03
  • 2A3G
  • H

Hmmm, this or the DROID. Decisions, decisions!

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-31 03:27
  • MZJX
  • C

I agree it looks like one of alcatel phone. Im a die hard alcatel user.

It looks like this
http://www.gsmarena.com/alcate...203-2843.php

http://www.gsmarena.com/alcate...103-2842.php

My phone??

http://www.gsmarena.com/alcate...pro-2285.php

..

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-29 20:54
  • 2A3G
  • U

Why the hell are gsmarena posting these aweful phones up here when moto have officailly announced the DROID??? Get with the times GSM.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-28 16:47
  • nGG5
  • U

motorola alws produced disgstng model.......n software should b more dvloped.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-27 17:25
  • uNVA
  • U

> In reply to chaser_xsnes9x @ 2009-10-26 20:25 from kJXC - click to read@chaser_xsnes9x:
These are not manufactured by Motroola, they are Alcatel phones with Moto branding. Motorola no longer makes their low end phones.

Where did you find this information?

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-27 13:50
  • 0UsH
  • R

> In reply to Prem Kumar @ 2009-10-26 13:06 from w4H4 - click to readBecause motorola want to touch those who are in developing country and for those who just need basic function of mobilephone: communication in light design (mobile) with good battery performance. I think i need this phone.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-27 10:15
  • tDT{
  • R

> In reply to Prem Kumar @ 2009-10-26 13:06 from w4H4 - click to readThese are not manufactured by Motroola, they are Alcatel phones with Moto branding. Motorola no longer makes their low end phones.

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-26 20:25
  • kJXC
  • R
Sort by:
Total of 42 user reviews and opinions for Motorola WX160.