LG GW550

LG

Popularity

Daily interest
1.7%
Total hits:
112409

Voting results

Design
7.6
Features
7.3
Performance
7.2
Votes:
208

General 2G Network GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
  HSDPA 900 / 2100
Announced 2009, June
Status Coming soon. Exp. release 2009, Q4
Size Dimensions 116 x 62 x 12 mm
Weight 125.5 g
Display Type TFT, 65K colors
Size 320 x 240 pixels, 2.4 inches
 - Full QWERTY keyboard
- Downloadable themes
Sound Alert types Vibration; Downloadable polyphonic, MP3 ringtones
Speakerphone Yes
Memory Phonebook Practically unlimited entries and fields, Photo call
Call records Practically unlimited
Card slot microSD up to 16GB
Data GPRS Class 10 (4+1/3+2 slots), 32 - 48 kbps
HSCSD Yes
EDGE Class 10, 236.8 kbps
3G HSDPA, 7.2 Mbps; HSUPA, 2 Mbps
WLAN Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g
Bluetooth Yes, v2.0 with A2DP
Infrared port No
USB Yes, v2.0 microUSB
Camera Primary 3.15 MP, 2048x1536 pixels
Video Yes
Secondary Yes
Features OS Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.5 Standard
Messaging SMS, MMS, Email, IM, Push Email
Browser WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML
Radio  
Games Yes
Colors Black
GPS Yes, with A-GPS support
Java Yes, MIDP 2.0
 - MP3/MP4/AAC/AAC+/EAAC+/WMA player
- MP4 player
- Document viewer (DOC, XLS, PPT, PDF)
- Organizer
- Photo/video editor
- Voice memo
- T9
Battery   Standard battery, Li-Ion 1300 mAh
Stand-by -
Talk time -

Disclaimer. We can not guarantee that the information on this page is 100% correct. Read more

LG GW550 - user opinions and reviews

  • Anonymous

Poor look. I bought one and sold it qucikly. It not worth it at all. nothing special. Not recommanding this phone.

  • Reply
  • 2009-11-18 06:42
  • Ui{t
  • H
  • bruno

It has WIFI. It looks bad but it's very good. U can record a voice message and send by MSG, you can take pictures/videos and upload them to panoramio/youtube. Ugly, but Good.

  • Reply
  • 2009-11-09 18:08
  • yfX5
  • U
  • Anonymous

WHAT AN UGLY LOOKING FONE.....WONT BUY IT AS IT LOOKS VERY BAD...a good looking fone is always preferable...whats d point of buying a fone which looks like a calculator

  • Reply
  • 2009-11-03 10:01
  • 2@X1
  • U