- tagnaz
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2007-05-11 13:44 from 2GBF - click to readoh my gosh...i had this phone in 2007...i had it in PINK, and back then it was all rave in high school. lol..but now that i think of it. it wasnt really that great- the memory capacity was too small..and the picture quality sucked! there wasnt any infrared or bluetooth aswell.
- Reply
- 2011-11-28 05:10
- t44p
- H
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
this phone was out before the c5-2, that's why it looks like it the c5-2 stemmed from this.
- Reply
- 2007-05-11 13:44
- 2GBF
- U
- danni
- Report
- 0
i love sagem but this phone is a copy!
go with the myC5-2 not only does it have a camera and its a flossy blue not just a dull red but it also is the newwst sexiest model and also it dosent have a big goofy antenar
- Reply
- 2005-11-29 09:28
- 2GgS
- U
- Nick
- Report
- 0
Can some one tell me why this sagem looks the same as the MYC5-2 and is also an exact copy of one of BIRDS phone, are sagem and bird the same companny?
- Reply
- 2005-09-29 03:15
- PQk9
- U
- amanda
- Report
- 0
hey wots the difference between dis phone and my sagem my c5-2 please tell me
- Reply
- 2005-09-06 07:41
- Rxsy
- U
- vien
- Report
- 0
its different wif the myc5-2 by it has infered,wap2.0 but no java and etc
- Reply
- 2005-06-19 12:30
- RN$B
- U
- india James.xue
- Report
- 0
o~~This is totally BIRD's phone. Why copy BIRD'S phone. I like bird's phone.
- Reply
- 2005-03-30 15:49
- PUEQ
- U
- jamacia
- Report
- 0
What is the difirance between this phone and the myc-52.
It looks like the color and the camera sett up.
please exsplain.
- Reply
- 2005-03-01 06:13
- in%a
- U
- yemisi
- Report
- 0
sagem my c-3s is a good gsm. the background is good and the shape.
- Reply
- 2004-12-02 13:42
- U
- Stardust
- Report
- 0
The design is too old. Dont like it, plus not a lot of features
- Reply
- 2004-10-11 17:48
- U


