News - Reader comments

Samsung S3650 - a new touch phone on the cheap

24 August, 2009 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung S3650 - a new touch phone on the cheap - read the full textIt seems that Samsung have another budget touchscreen phone in store for us besides the already available Samsung S5230 Star - meet the Samsung S3650. It's got a quite compact design, unique colors and a 200 euro price tag. And it's almost knocking on your door due for release within 10...

 

Sort by:

i was thinking about getting one would u suggest it and what colour is the best. Also what is the best price for it.

  • Reply
  • 2010-04-04 22:03
  • 3Hid

it is a very good phone i have it and it can handle much i have drop it 30 times and it dosent have any sckrats( speling )

  • Reply
  • 2009-12-29 22:48
  • m@T@

>.< this fone luks like the 1 bein used in you're beautiful xD ~ shin woo usin this fone xD ~~

  • Reply
  • 2009-12-09 08:36
  • Uijg

Damn, dudes, what are you complaining about? It's a pretty good phone. Trust me, I know (: . So if the design don't suite for you, this doesn't mean that it's not suitable for others. By the way, I like all the roundness, other phones are just not like it. And that's what I like-originality. Plus there are lots of colours, not just yellow. There's pink, orange, yellow and white. And every phone is included with a fashion jacket, two actually. A black one, and a designer one, with a colour you choosed. One more pluspoint, it's cheap. Perfect for teenagers, all the community sites are on the Widget list and you can add more Widgets. MP3 is also with a good sound. So do what you like, but I recommend it strongly. Peace (x

  • Reply
  • 2009-12-02 18:23
  • 05N1

how much is corby for????????

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-28 06:31
  • 2@xA

guys m planning to buy samsung corby.........plz tell me the price n other distinguished features when compared with nokia 5800.......

  • Reply
  • 2009-10-24 22:12
  • t@x8
  • Gurdeep Singh Mander
  • Report
  • Rating0

I don't see any 3G in this. A nice entry-level touch phone but badly designed! The overall "round-round" impression doesn't feel good. Atleast, I won't buy it, if it comes designed so.

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-28 14:12
  • utnM

gr8 phone

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-28 08:16
  • TL5j

> In reply to Leo @ 2009-08-25 16:43 from G2GS - click to readA quick reading of your post shows how much you must know of those phones, seeing as you can barely get some of their names correctly.

Besides, you'll have to excuse me, but me and [seeing as two of the phones you mentioned (or rather, tried to mention) are in the top 3 most popular phones] most of the people here at GSMARENA would have to disagree with those claims of yours.

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-25 22:11
  • nwfT

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-08-25 16:01 from paur - click to readBecause not eveyone can afford more than entry level phones, such as this.

That is not my case, and apparently not yours as well, but there are alot of people out there, some with tighter budgets than others, and they should also have something they can buy.

Besides, Nokia and Samsung aren't exactly new at this.

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-25 22:00
  • nwfT

> In reply to iolo003 @ 2009-08-25 11:36 from v0qL - click to readAre you kidding me?? Not even this phone looks as cheap and lame as all those 5400, 5800, 5434, 5350, 5540, or whaterver, nokias! Now that is lame!!

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-25 16:43
  • G2GS

Samsung and Nokia excel at mid and high end devices and providing quality devices for all market segments. Why do they assume that the buying public will always want the cheapest basic device in town? People would rather wait and get quality.

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-25 16:01
  • paur

this phone is already dead even before its official announcement. nokia 5230 butchered it to the bones! poor samsung!

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-25 11:36
  • v0qL

No way! Did Samsung just fire some of their Staff from the design department and hired new staff from Palm. The Soap-like styling doesn't do for me and it looks like one of the phones from Palm. I wouldn't buy this phone.

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-25 09:13
  • Ge@H

I have always praised Samsung for it's design. But this is a major disappointment. Hope they stick with their trademark shape and don't divert into this sort of soap-like designs.

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-25 08:37
  • vwdn

> In reply to Andrew @ 2009-08-24 18:55 from mtqX - click to readYeah Nokia 5530 XM still better , cheap price with expensive features because it Smartphone.

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-25 05:36
  • tDLc

Worst Looking Phone

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-25 05:05
  • 9GQ1

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-08-25 01:01 from 8Pj8 - click to readIt's from the Sxxx family.

Sucessor means "one who comes after", meaning it comes/ is born/ is made after the predecessor.

It merely indicates the time difference between one thing and another, that one came after the other.

It doesn't mean "better than the predecessor". You probably see it with that added meaning given the fact that, due to evolution and progress in technology, newer models are usually better than previous ones.

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-25 03:42
  • nwfN

Looks and sounds good enough for those people who want to own their first touchscreen device and don't want to pay an arm and a leg...

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-25 01:09
  • G2GS

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-08-24 22:52 from nwfN - click to readSo, the father ha the child. It is his family.
Those devices are not from the same family. You can't call a sucessor just because it's brand new. It should be equivalent, from the same category - something that must substitute the predecessor.

  • Reply
  • 2009-08-25 01:01
  • 8Pj8

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.