p.h, 25 Mar 2016Oh, that's good to hear. I hope they then will finally step up their quality, because most AMO... moreI don't know about tablets but for phones black crush hasn't been there since over 2 years ago.
regs, 25 Mar 2016Super AMOLEDs has been there since very first Galaxy S. It's a brand name for a large model sc... moreNexus 6P - No Super AMOLED- The large 5.7-inch display is an AMOLED capacitive touchscreen but not a Super AMOLED which is found on the Samsung Galaxy. Comparison wishes the Super AMOLED consumes less power which can save the battery juice a lot and, more importantly, it has better viewing angles than a standard AMOLED, but sadly it's ainÂ’t any with Nexus 6P.
checkout google or mobile sites (gsmarena)
LOL, IPS is better because:
1. The color aren't as saturated and poisonous, so if you aim for a more realistic result while taking a photo, better take IPS since Amoled only used in some phones, but not in Laptops, big screens etc...
2. Amoled would freakin burn your eyes off at night with it's pixel shining right into your eye.
3. Amoled screens got pixels that burn much more often then IPS.
4. IPS is better then Amoled.
L. E. D better than L. C. D... Btw can anyone tell me why does super amoled comes only in pentile matrix not the rab one rectangular
Anonymous, 25 Mar 2016Ok. theres no argument here if its your opinion.And one thing is samsung is using SUPER AMOLED... moreThat it's unsuitable for media consumption is my opinion. That SUPER DUPER BUZZWORD AMOLED screens, as used in Samsung devices such as the Galaxy Tab S2 suffer severe Black crush and color banding is a fact.
p.h, 25 Mar 2016Now who are you referring to with "professional"? Incase you mean websites like this one, they... moreOk. theres no argument here if its your opinion.And one thing is samsung is using SUPER AMOLED its not cheap compared to just AMOLED.
Nallaikumaran, 25 Mar 2016The Super AMOLED isn't cheaper. Do you not understand? Difference Between Super AMOLED (Galaxy... moreSuper AMOLEDs has been there since very first Galaxy S. It's a brand name for a large model scope of AMOLED displays.
Speaking of Nexus 6P. It has same Super AMOLED screen as has been used from Galaxy S4 to Galaxy Note 5. $55 could be a price for complete assembly - screen, digitizer and glass.
The Super AMOLED isn't cheaper. Do you not understand? Difference Between Super AMOLED (Galaxy S7) and AMOLED (Nexus 6P)
Galaxy S7 and Samsung Phones - Super AMOLED costs $55 (SOURCE:IHS Mobile Handsets Intelligence Service). AMOLED $14.30 (Nexus 6P)
Anonymous, 25 Mar 2016An amatures review VS a professionals review.Not just one professional but comparing your find... moreNow who are you referring to with "professional"? Incase you mean websites like this one, they don't even test what I've mentioned. Their reviews are lackluster. They only test the things which AMOLED is quite good at, so obviously the conclusion of the review will turn out good.
I don't need a fake "professional" to tell me what's good and what not. I tested the unit myself (since I own it) and drew my own conclusions. And in my opinion, The problems I mentioned make the device unsuitable for media consumption for me.
Anyways, I am looking forward to samsung stepping up the quality of their screens since apperently the production is pretty cheap now so they should be capable of doing that. Except if people are being such plebs and don't care about it and keep buying it and reviewers never point it out. Then they might as well keep selling their garbage. I DO like their devices but this problem definitely kills it for me. If only they would put proper screens in their units I'd buy them without hesitation.
I like LCD more than AMOLED. AMOLED contrast is higher than LCD, it make my eyes hurt.
p.h, 25 Mar 2016Oh, that's good to hear. I hope they then will finally step up their quality, because most AMO... moreAn amatures review VS a professionals review.Not just one professional but comparing your findings to alot of professionals to how the AMOLED is to LCD.Wow just WOW!
Zahid Hasan, 25 Mar 2016That's your opinion. To me, amoled is a must.
Both have their advantages and disadvantages... moreOpinions don't matter when there are measurements: http://www.displaymate.com/Gal...ootOut_1.htm
Amoled consistently outplay IPS for years. Only kids or idiots prefer IPS at this point. It's like asking "do you prefer an electric car or a Ford T". Some weirdos would prefer the Ford T, but they're weirdos, I don't think that we should be concerned with them ...
Now that amoled is cheap Apple will start using it in their upcoming iphones.. They will call it a new innovation and charge a hefty premium on the sheep
Very low quality control and higher rate of passed defects makes them cheaper.
Oh, that's good to hear. I hope they then will finally step up their quality, because most AMOLED screens in samsung devices I've seen are absolutely horrible. For example I have a Galaxy Tab S2 and it has that ugly contrast gradient going from the bottom to the top of the screen. I compared to 4! other Galaxy Tab S2 and they ALL have that problem, some more some less. You can notice this especially when viewing the grey background of chrome (when no tab is opened).
Furthermore, all of them have severe black crush, meaning that dark contrasts are indistinguishable from eachother and this makes it impossible to make out details in dark scenes. Infact i first noticed that when watching a video which I've watched on my PC before, not by doing a test specifically designed to make this visible. You can't see below 7 (on a contrast scale from 0-255) on a dark room on low brightness. even on 100% brightness you only see down to 5. This problem in my opinion makes the device unsuitable for media consumption. I rather have a bad TFT Display with bad colors and all but where i at least can actually SEE something in videos. Great device and all but tihs is a deal breaker.
So now that the production costs are so low they can finally throw all those garbage panels into the trash and give us proper displays. Or maybe the average Samsung-customer is that much of a pleb that he doesn't even care that he's using garbage. The reviewers who test screens should test what I talked about in this comment and make it clear how bad this actually is, maybe Samsung would rethink then. Personally this holds me back from buying a Samsung device. This one was a gift, So was my galaxy S2 which also had this problem. 4 years later it still exists.
I mean yes, it has nice punchy colors and pure blacks and all, but that doesn't make up for the aforementioned problems in my opinion. Maybe if all you do on this device is play clash of clans, browse the web a bit then yes it's not a big deal breaker. but if you like to watch movies on it then it sucks.
IPS neo is an amoled killer.
Samsung is just wanting show that amoled is the best.
Some people prefer amoled but some prefer ips LCD.
IPS LCD can match amoled quality.
Good example are G5,Z5p, iPhone 6s plus.
So don't go trolling everyone amoled is the best.
Yes amoled does indeed appear good across all devices. But IPS LCD is not bad.