The optimal ppi should be around 400-600 ppi, so that would mean 720p on devices with 3-4 inch screens, 1080p on 4-5.2 in, qhd on 5.3-7 in, and 4k and 8k on everything else
Yeah it's got some specs but what about at least a 4000mah battery? These manufacturers need to make this an solution. Big SCREEN 4000 -5000MAH BATTERY
Miki, 30 Mar 2016Xiaomi, don't follow that insane Samsung logic. QHD screens make no sense at all. No benefits ... moreSaddly, there are still people feeding the thought that the bigger the better. There's no point on having more than 340ppi pixel density. Most people don't even see the difference between 290-320ppi. And yeah, they always say: But we want it for VR... and I'm pretty sure most of them don't even use VR.
sa11oum, 31 Mar 2016Not that what you're saying is incorrect or anything, but I still think FHD is better for phon... moreActually the 6s plus has faster memory and a significant stronger GPU.. So the nexus is the low spec device and still there is barely a difference in performance
galaxys6owner, 30 Mar 2016Whats is the problem with you people.If you compare any display>5" QHD does make a differe... more"I think QHD should be standard on all flagships."
Flagship display sizes come in varying sizes.
"If you want HD display go buy a Budget Phone or xperia z compact series or even worse iPhone se"
Budget, flagship, or whatever, I'd go for HD if the display size falls on my perceived appropriate category (which could be different from society's categorical average). I do not just go blindly follow society's averages. I weigh on my perceived category that which could shift, change, distort, or revert at some point(s) in time. Just so I would not feel any regrets on a device I would be using for years before I blame it all on society's standards for patterning my choice after it
Muthu, 30 Mar 2016I would like to disagree with you due to the below reasons. 1. Technology improves very fa... moreNot that what you're saying is incorrect or anything, but I still think FHD is better for phones with less 6.0" on the diagonal. Your arguments are valid BUT any phone with FHD as opposed to QHD will still perform better, even if the 2016 chips can handle QHD just fine, they will handle FHD even better. The difference is really not that big. I have a 6P and a 6s Plus and there is a difference but it's barely there. I prefer a smoother UI and better battery life (which the 6s Plus have over the 6P even though the specs are lesser)
xiaomi going the right path. it's only the software that I dislike, so custom ROM is the only option
Anonymous, 30 Mar 2016It should rather be: 3.5" - 4.6" = HD 4.7" - 48" = FHD 50" - 80" = 4K UHD 85" - 98" - 11... moreWhats is the problem with you people.If you compare any display>5" QHD does make a difference.If you compare a Phone with both screens you will understand.HD is a NO-NO even for any Midranger.I think QHD should be standard on all flagships.If you want HD display go buy a Budget Phone or xperia z compact series or even worse iPhone se
Anger, 30 Mar 2016How exactly ? How enyx heated SD ? SD was more powerful in most testsBenchmarks are not indication of how good or bad a software experience would be.There is a thing called optimisation.Benchmarks are not optimized for any one device.so the device with better specs would get a higher benchmark.Samsung has almost optimized the Touchwiz(Or mayne (Good Locks) in the future) for exynos.So Touchwiz might run smoother on Exynos.Touchwiz might look very different from the N release(Google Good Locks UI)
I don't care about RAM and processor, noone should care that much anymore, the nexus 6p I had for a couple of months was blazing fast with that sd810.
What I care about I the overall experience and the camera and as much as I like xiaomi, they really have to find a better solution than this mediocre 5 lens optics imx 298... That's 2014 image quality, the note 4 did better...
Nope I am more exited about info of snap 823 (maybe Will come in next nexus and next flagship Sony series too :D)
Umbilical Noose, 30 Mar 2016It goes like this:
Upto 4.7 inches : HD
4.75-5.9 inches : FHD
5.95 inches and above : QHDIt should rather be:
3.5" - 4.6" = HD
4.7" - 48" = FHD
50" - 80" = 4K UHD
85" - 98" - 110" - 145" and above = 8k UHD
Muthu, 30 Mar 2016I would like to disagree with you due to the below reasons. 1. Technology improves very fa... moreWhat? 2 years ago phones with the SD 801 released and that processor still performs better than this year's 'octa' core processors which are better only have better multicore scores in benchmarks.
Xiaomi is literally on fire.
pumping out awesome devices round after round.