Yuri, 08 Apr 2016Performs better? In what aspect? 1 or 2 benchmarks? Comparing benchmark scores on top end smar... moreYuri, Yuri, Yuri!
That makes too much sense and those types of comments are not allowed. They will make the fanboy's heads explode.
Dot-WiFi, 13 Apr 2016never happenhahaha...Really....really????
Dot-WiFi, 11 Apr 2016yeah ... only 50 comment on android , and 200 comment on apple ...N 300 comments on Galaxy
AnonD-361638, 08 Apr 2016and i see lot more comments in androids by iPhone users.yeah ... only 50 comment on android , and 200 comment on apple ...
AnonD-145833, 10 Apr 2016Javascript - Apple outperforms Android based phones due to its single core performance. If web... moreYou need to learn more about web browsing experience.
Anonymous, 08 Apr 2016The best performing S7 is the model with the Quad-Core Snapdragon 820. And why compare th... moreJavascript - Apple outperforms Android based phones due to its single core performance. If web browsing is one of the main things you do on your phone you will generally get a better experience on an iOS device.
Dot-WiFi, 08 Apr 2016why ? it hurt ur feeling ?I just feel amusing :))
Few days ago the other story dropped the share prices and now this..scum.
Ed, 07 Apr 2016Yeap same specs than 6S costing $200 less.
Performs better than top $600 Androids.
To be... morePerforms better? In what aspect? 1 or 2 benchmarks? Comparing benchmark scores on top end smartphones is pretty redundant nowadays as they can all handle just about anything you can throw at it.
Not to mention the following issues which make benchmark comparisons a very tricky exercise:
- iOS (limited, closed, highly-optimized and polished OS) vs Android (multi-platform open source OS)
-2k resolution on a 5.1 or 5.5 inch AMOLED screen vs sub-720p resolution on a 4inch LCD panel (Vastly different screen sizes, resolutions and screen technologies)
-Different technologies and frequencies used in the manufacturing of the CPUs in each device
-Different methods of interaction/instruction between CPU and various components of phone (Screen, RAM, GPU etc.)
Not a fair comparison, but end the end of the day you have to admit that 4inch sup par res screen on a 2016 phone, carrying a massive pricetag is terrible, especially as this is the age of multimedia and social networking, thus the need for a bigger and better screen is a real must
Hmm, 08 Apr 2016Earth calling......Soon you will be financially lotted by the apple.
Linas, 08 Apr 2016Yes it has performed great on it's tiny screen with tiny resolution. It is not really like-for... moreThat is not how it works lol
BTW can you change the resolution on phones? So your point is well painless.
Anonymous, 07 Apr 2016Well I work in a phone shop in UK. .we have sold one of them which got returned as they didn't... moreThat could be your store because all I checked in UK are sold out.
Or maybe... you are lying.
Linas, 08 Apr 2016Yes it has performed great on it's tiny screen with tiny resolution. It is not really like-for... moreNice story but you are wrong, that resolution difference make very small difference in reality, it only showing big part in games, not loading apps etc. SE is almost as fast as iPhone 6s plus, according to you SE should be a lot faster, but it isn't because the resolution isnt as big thing you try to say.
Linas, 08 Apr 2016Yes it has performed great on it's tiny screen with tiny resolution. It is not really like-for... moreYou will be running all apps/games at native resolution, so a performance measurement at anything other than that would be pointless.
Dot-WiFi, 08 Apr 2016i see lot and more comment on apple article compare with android articleand i see lot more comments in androids by iPhone users.
styloAV, 08 Apr 2016Irrespective of spec sheet , iPhone SE has performed great against top end androids like galax... moreYes it has performed great on it's tiny screen with tiny resolution. It is not really like-for-like comparison comparing FPS on 2560x1440 screen and 1136x640. Is it? Samsung S7 gets about the same performance running screen with 3.7MP, while SE has 0.7MP. That is 5.3 times less resolution. So now if you do fair comparison and SE does like 20FPS over the 15FPS on Samsung (in most cases Samsung is probably still making slightly more FPS even on the bigger screen, I am just taking most extreme case) it is in fact Samsung does 5.3 X 15 = 79FPS. The real performance is like 4 times better on Samsung than it is on iPhone (and that is not only SE, but as well s6 and especially s6plus).
Ooblar, 08 Apr 2016I have the iPhone 6S and I think the SE is crap, and not worth the money. Because you have to ... moreI agree its costly but basically I'm telling about the comparison between spec sheet of any iPhone with flagship androids as well as the price.
Its around 585$ in India and yes its way to costly compared to 6S which is starting from around 600$.
AnonD-361638, 08 Apr 2016Same with ifans who romes in every Android article... LoLi see lot and more comment on apple article compare with android article
AnonD-331993, 08 Apr 2016I cant use a phone that is below 4.6" inch seriously. ive triedthen how u used phone before this , when big screen still didnt exits .... or maybe ur first phone in ur life must be 5"?
Tip us
1.7m 126k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up