Most ugly phone in history
I don't think this subject was well researched. Why don't they just keep it simple and boring like all their phones?
Samsung is too expensive for it's bad quality, and cheep feel ;)
i dont think the twin facing is goin to far. Its truelly is an inovative solution to the problems faced with the demands of the market. Good thinking really.
As the Multimedia side only had one reall button on the face, (with the (others being touch sensitive ala LG KG800) it wil fill like any other phone in one hands. Such a clever idea.
Im interested into how usable the small screen is condiering how we are all so used to large pusdo vga screens with devices now.
Either way, cant wait to have a play with one :P
the f300 is ok but the dual faced nature of d bar phone seems like going too far. samsung probably had a transistor radio with added features in mind when designing the look of the f500. the i600 is good. a business phone but the omap processor might pose a problem in terms of speed.
how long will the battery life go on the f500?? and also when will it be available? the unique designs and specs are nice but if the battery life sucks then what is the point on having a video phone?
What do u mean wheres 3.5G?? are u blind?? 3.5G is HSDPA/UMTS and 3G is only UMTS, so they are i600=3.5G F500=3G
Samsung is special i agree... but the features are just too normal... where's 3G?? or 3.5G?? erm... better re-think....
Just like Samsung D900 samsung has done it again with there crazy slim mobiles
F300 is hot! but I am confused with the idea of the both accessible sides. It might give you bed impressions in a public place.
samsung needs appreciation for bringing out phones of different looks type and feel.they r good in folding and sliding phones.now is good in slim phones too.just look at razr it is very monotonous now same design different somethings.but i hope samsung will bring out very sofisticated smart phones withh all features in one.the ultimta phone.i am waitinf...............
"If you look around they actually started the "slim" factor in korea at least a year before motorola (the only reason why motorola gets credit for the slim factor is because they claimed to be the first)."
how about WE don't look around. how about YOU look around, lucienium, and point us to some of these slim phones that you claim were created before the RAZR. back up your facts or shut the hell up.
Samsung needs to give service and quality like Nokia and
SE and not unlike Nokia and SE
everything fit n fine but F300 rally looks like a TV remote control. Imagine if u could play a horror movie while u'r talking to someone u hate the most. He he hee.
Samsung really needs to come out of its nutshell and give the quality and service unlike Nokia and SE. Korea is not the world. If u start giving out 10 mpx camera's and there r no takers ultimately the company is to be blamed not Nokia and SE. I feel SE and Nokia rules.
Samsung usually releases phones first in Korea. If you look around they actually started the "slim" factor in korea at least a year before motorola (the only reason why motorola gets credit for the slim factor is because they claimed to be the first). They also started adding 3mpx up cams before sony ericsson and nokia.
Also, the end basically justifies the means, and Samsung has always performed better than both Nokia and Motorola. Take the D900 for example. It's a lot smaller than Nokia's N93 but its camera is by far better than the latter (minus the video recording capabilities o'course. but then again, a samsung the size of nokia n93 would probably be powerful enough to run desktop applications)
where did they come up with this kind of idea and technology? i mean i thought about this kind of phone in my imagination but i didn't know they were going to actually this type of phone.. amazing... samsung is truly amazing