News - Reader comments

Samsung unveils Galaxy S Plus, ticks at 1.4GHz

13 April, 2011 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung unveils Galaxy S Plus, ticks at 1.4GHz - read the full textSamsung has been treating the Russian market with an unusually warm heart lately. The other day they announced the Star II Duos and today it has pulled the veil on the special Galaxy S Plus, with both targeted to launch in Russia. The phone will be marketed as the Galaxy S 2011 edition on the...

 

Sort by:

No flash again!!!! what is the use?

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-14 06:19
  • mTHD

...so in june we can expect 1.6ghz
in july 1.8ghz
in august 2ghz
...correct me if im wrong...



  • Reply
  • 2011-04-14 03:43
  • RNWB

i think ,Lg Optimus 2x much better compare samung galaxy s plus..

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-14 03:20
  • ib1x

Faster CPU but much slower GPU? Don't want.

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-14 02:21
  • Y7Tb

I thought Samsung did their own CPUs.
And why leave out the led?

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-14 02:20
  • mhBX

Why would anyone buy this when the Galaxy S II is coming out at around the same time or very soon after?

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-14 02:12
  • 0deg

OMG.. Smartphones started to overcome netbook performance...

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-14 02:07
  • MbtT

Oh come on don't stay with 4'inc screen give us something bigger let's say around to 4.5'inc please begging you..

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-14 00:50
  • 0Ttq

So, Samsung launches yet another phone... it's quite annoying, in fact. But the real concern is prices. How come this one is more expensive than an iPad?!??!

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-14 00:48
  • m9s9

Soon, my computer's 3.6 Ghz quad core processor will feel outdated by these cell phones.

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-14 00:40
  • 2@e%
  • The Ex-Nokia Fanboy
  • Report
  • Rating0

Just get the I9000 and overclock it to 1.4 GHz. You'll have all the features of Galaxy S Plus and a better GPU.

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-14 00:10
  • IDkH

Awesome! I am stuck.. Arc, SG2, or wait i5.. bruaaaa

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-13 23:45
  • vCAb

I was interested until I saw the compare tool. Any reason why someone would not get an SG2 instead. Will get cheaper though, must be if they want to sell.

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-13 23:32
  • mTn2

What does'nt Have Built in Toaster, That Sucks.

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-13 21:39
  • 0FuH

most phones look like this now so stop beeing an i-fanboy.

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-13 21:38
  • 3iRA

not worth the money, just because it has 400 mhz more and a metallic cover.

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-13 21:28
  • MCru


No flash again!! Ohh my god this can't be true loool.

Samsung just keeps providing me with reasons to make a laugh out of them.

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-13 20:53
  • 9xdS

They should have left the same cpu/gpu compination as the original SGS...no point in slightly upgrading the cpu and massively degrading it's gpu. Seems like Samsung is making awkward decisions with gpu's in their devices this year (Mali400 in SGS2 still has questionable performance).

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-13 20:35
  • MK82

Galaxy S 2011? This naming strategy is good. Even in automobiles, sportsbikes change technically every 2 years, like Honda CBR, Kawasaki Ninja, etc. but they retain the same name, so that PAST ADVERTISING's BENEFITS REMAIN!

If Nokia could have retained old names, like using the name "N73 2009 model" rather than "N79", then the past advertising could have added up to value, creating legends out of those mobiles!
And they would not run out of model names.

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-13 20:23
  • 7tD@

Nice update! :)

I have searched some info about a "Super AMOLED" and its "Burn-In" effect and seams that about 35% of "Super AMOLED" users are telling that their screens are affected by Burn-In effect. And that is pretty sad!
So, it would be useful to know more official news about "Super AMOLED Plus" lifetime and "Burn-In" effect, I think it may be a big disadvantage! :(

What do you think about that?

  • Reply
  • 2011-04-13 20:21
  • 0xM5

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.