Nokia at the 3GSM 2007
The highlight over at Nokia camp is nothing less than the Nokia E90 Communicator itself. The other new handsets include Nokia E65, Nokia E61i, Nokia N77, Nokia 6110 Navigator and Nokia 3110 classic....
- Phantom Admin
- Report
Nokia 6110 has a feature lacking - Tracking - we have added that with duress capabilites - so now you can use your Nokia 6110 phone as a duress device - download free software from www.phantomeye.com
- Reply
- 2007-10-24 18:20
- 2C{@
- Anny
- Report
Nokia I agree is a good suplier of mobile. But I still love Motorola ones for daily using. I ever used Moto T189 for five years without any problems. Isn't it astonishing?
Anny, CEO
http://www.kendoo.com
- Reply
- 2007-07-24 10:07
- Utnx
- tecfre
- Report
e90 is the best mobile communicator till date.
its really the best ..and will be a gadget lovers dream.
source:www.tecfre.com
- Reply
- 2007-05-05 16:53
- M{3N
- Terry
- Report
Nokia have been a big player in mobile for a long time but if they fail to advance and keep producing handsets that all look the same their days may be numbered. People want new and exciting mobiles now not the same old thing in a new way.
- Reply
- 2007-04-17 05:52
- PP$8
- wonderman
- Report
Nokia a nice phone but sony ericsson is far better so check for yourself.
- Reply
- 2007-03-28 20:06
- Nxsf
- Xaibi
- Report
Great Lot Overall... Seems like the Communicator is a GPS Navigator... Can't wait to get my hands on it!
- Reply
- 2007-03-02 12:36
- Rxf0
- m
- Report
http://www.gsmarena.com/compar...dPhone1=1882
cant decide between the two....
- Reply
- 2007-03-02 08:52
- 2THp
- AKSHAY DHANKAWADE
- Report
NOKIA once again improve at it cares for all the range of customers and users.
All products are great.
AKSHAY DHANKAWADE
- Reply
- 2007-03-01 08:57
- TRau
- AKSHAY DHANKAWADE
- Report
WOW! its realy great one .. All awaited phone! I wish Nokia 9300i should come up with a cam to fullfil my dream ...but this was realy a shock to know that in E90 they cme up with 3.2 MP camera and Radio ... its simply superb n worth paying ..
AKSHAY DHANKAWADE
- Reply
- 2007-03-01 08:54
- TRau
- Aloenasyerita
- Report
NOKIA.... Can you make E90 in other OS? Maybe Windows mobike 6.0 like Q q9????
- Reply
- 2007-02-28 10:46
- M@T2
- Anonymous
- Report
windows?!?! hell no, the e90 beats the crap of that imate in every feature.
- Reply
- 2007-02-28 06:01
- Pv9c
- condor
- Report
There is also an alternative...
http://www.gsmarena.com/i_mate...150-1882.php
Maybe its time to take a look somewhere else...
- Reply
- 2007-02-25 19:08
- nrj5
- roshan
- Report
great phones ..but 8 weeks turnaround time for repairs thats insane
- Reply
- 2007-02-24 14:43
- NaD}
- gabriel.beclean
- Report
wow...new models...like fotomodels
if you know what i mean
congratulation nokia!
you did it again
and the romanian people says: BETON!!!
- Reply
- 2007-02-23 07:16
- nsF8
- chaz
- Report
here's a a preview of Nokia E-90!
http://www.allaboutsymbian.com..._Preview.php
- Reply
- 2007-02-23 04:39
- w0QN
- cezar
- Report
to be realistic, me myself do not need such 5mp camera resolution, wifi super-g, Hsdpa, and many more. basically the enthusiast mostly buys what N-series offer, but for more realistic persons like me, buying phone with such features you don't need just ruin your pocket. it's not the matter of having enormous features that makes a good mobile phone company. it's the matter of how the company can deal with the customers giving them such good quality, handy and functional and have a very good price-feature ratio. those features that spreads out of the mobile-tech doesn't really impress me. i am just behind the power of the platform to handle those powerful features and to be frank i hate what samsung,SE and Nokia does. samsung always lacks what basic features should be in a phone. they do not also focus on the quality of the features they produce. issues like messaging function poorness, very expensive pricetag that is somehow do not decrease for the last 10 months and their very fragile slim designs (though they say it's durable but to be true,lower ends tend to be more durable than those higher ones... is that quality?). i am no fan of slim mobiles motorola,samsung produces. neither nokia and SE's slim lines of N/6xxx and walkman/cybershot series. Nokia always tremendously makes featurepacked phones but the worse is that the feature sometimes lags, hangs, and restarts and the worst is the poor battery backup. i think they must first focus on the quality and the power consumption before adding different features into their units. the name also do not imply quality as of now, it is popular but do not promise users a value to their money IMO. price is tad too high for a mobile(maybe that's the reason they call it media computers)=) and most users arrive at their customer service centers for repairing and repairing. the motorola's concentration to razrs is their way to prevent looses of profit imo. their razrs is somewhat arrives with a very high price that you may first think of buying other model of that price. and they are somewhat blind that features also matters for a phone. and still they have poor quality with their batteries and UI but because slim phones are in on this generation. but the good thing is that they lead the low-ends bringing features that can be seen from higher-end models. SE has very stable market sales as of now unlike their parent sony. SE has still on their way of developing new technologies at a attractive price ranges. and they are the best if price-to-feature ratio is mentioned. but they started as a company producing high ends with such features unseen on other phones of other brands(this is where nokia realizes importance of having many features).now they can hardly produce P-series phones just because they still have limited budgets for having some experiments. so feature enthusiasts just condemn them for the lack of features they wanted on that brand name. i also am disappointed to that. but i am impressed that the quality of their phones is uncomparable as a user of so many phones eapecially the rich back-up navigations if some hardware navigators like joystick malfunctions. but some may disagree for sure=D. but i think they should also make their feature-hungry fans happy aside from the so many mid-rangers and low-enders. and i think the series K,W,Z and J should be in mid-ranges because the only series destined for the high-end bracket is the P-series one. i can't think of SE being wierd that K800,W900,W850 is ranged with P990 as high-ends... why?
but anyway it's just an opinion in my part. and i love those companies.
- Reply
- 2007-02-22 04:39
- 2A3m
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed