News - Reader comments

Nokia X7 goes on pre-order in the UK, first taste of Symbian Anna

05 June, 2011 | Read the news | Post your comment
Nokia X7 goes on pre-order in the UK, first taste of Symbian Anna - read the full textThe Nokia X7 has now appeared alongside its QWERTY launch partner the E6, available for pre-order in the UK. Slated for release at the end of June, both devices are running the latest version of Nokia's Symbian OS - Symbian Anna. This will come as great news to any UK based die hard Nokia fans who...


Sort by:

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-06-07 12:59 from iJDX - click to readlesson nokia hasnt gon mad u have so get the hell out of here and dont mske of us x7 users cuz it is just nice

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-09 19:53
  • dNC6

i have used one and it is nice, it was a prototype so a bit slow but i think the real deal will be a nice phone to use. and i love the design its like an alienware laptop.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-09 08:15
  • PPGP

I am planning to buy the NOKIA X7-00, but worried of the transition of NOKIA to Microsoft Windows by the end of 2011. does it mean this phone will be obsolete or will be switched to windows ??? I need to know before buying. Thanks

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-07 22:27
  • fkfh

Is Nokia going crazy or what? seems they are in a race to create the most ugly no features no apps low-end mobile phones ever.Come-on Nokia wake up,if i where the owner of Nokia i would have fired every body for there lack of ((BRAINS)).Just follow the crowd and give the people an android phones it's just that simple....fools

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-07 12:59
  • iJDX

I think the X7 looks really nice and solid imo.. i was put off with phone like the first galaxy s due to cheap plastic feel to it. I'm not a big fan of symnbian tho from having a omnia i8910 HD which is a brilliant for it's time and I can't really comment on symbian anna as i haven't used it.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-06 23:41
  • H5Bd

realy its very nice phone and nice designe,when i seen on the net, i liked it soo much

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-06 20:36
  • YQUb

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-06-06 17:29 from L4D5 - click to readdear just wait for nokia E6 :-) and do not look to space look at performance :-) . i owned nokia n95 and samsung OMNIA II nokia n95 64 ram and processor speed 320mhz . but when i played in same time youtube applictions n95 is so faster it's play in 5s

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-06 18:55
  • 9CHE

God save nokia, its getting worse and worse....look at the design... looks like some 70's gadget......and on top of that...symbian... :(

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-06 18:34
  • 2SZR

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-06-06 17:10 from L4D5 - click to readI was talking about LOADING speed. Not actually game performance.

n8 it tooks forever to load.

same game different iPhone's 3g (2008) is kind of same level with N8.

same galaxy s 10 second, not bad either

desire took 10 seconds too, not bad

But nokia about 25 second, really? and this same goes for every heavy games, loading times are 2-3 times slower than others.

How long or small amount of time you think that game would take load with 1ghz processor if N8 could had it?

And i didn't meant screen or usb or anything like that. I was talking about speed the whole time.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-06 18:19
  • p77X

Hello there, don't you know Symbian OS doesn't need much processor speed. All the androids are bumping up the processor speed because they the OS is bulky.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-06 18:06
  • 7qBd

> In reply to Technogeek001 @ 2011-06-06 11:14 from iFn4 - click to readThe only relevant issue worth considering is how much power is required to run the OS smoothly. Since Symbian requires less power than e.g. iOS or Android, then 680MHZ is enough to provide a speedy and smooth user experience.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-06 17:48
  • PC$t

> In reply to Duel @ 2011-06-06 15:34 from p77X - click to readAlso, ask a business man if he prefers a Nokia E6 with 680Mhz CPU or a Galaxy Pro with 800Mhz CPU.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-06 17:29
  • L4D5

> In reply to Duel @ 2011-06-06 15:34 from p77X - click to readYou are really comparing game performance from different plataforms?
iPhone games are much better optimized than any other plataform, that's why even with worse GPU, games on the iPhone runs better than on N8, and even on Android.
Also, I would really love to see where did you see this comparasion of the NFS Shift loading between N8 and iPhone 4.

I also believe that Nokia should put fast processors on their phones, but it's obviously that Symbian need much less CPU power to run smoother than Android, take a look how laggy are all Motorola phones, Galaxy Ace, Spica and so on...

Stone age hardware? I thought that comparing games from different platforms were enough to prove that you have such a limited technical knowledge. Get real man, use a high-end CPU chip is not what makes a good hardware, you just need to buy from any phone parts supplier.
If Nokia use stone age hardware, what you have to say about the poor cameras and sound quality of HTC phones? What do you have to say about the cheap plastic used on Samsung and Sony Ericsson phones? What do you have to say about CBD AMOLED screens, Pentaband 3G, USB On-the-go, Bluetooth 3.0, FM Transmitter etc on Nokia phones?
Oh sorry, I forgot that CPU is everything that matter about "hardware".

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-06 17:10
  • L4D5

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-06-06 15:18 from Sarx - click to readthere are many android devices running on 600mgh like xperia x8 and milestone.get your crappy facts right

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-06 16:41
  • pUAH

> In reply to Technogeek001 @ 2011-06-06 11:14 from iFn4 - click to readYes it's a 680MHZ Proccesor, fast enough to run multiple applications smoothly s^3

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-06 15:59
  • P9Ba

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-06-06 15:18 from Sarx - click to readAndroid doesn't need it either, faster processor=everything works faster, it's so easy. iPhone 4 works faster than iPhone 3gs, htc sensation works faster than desire, galaxy s2 works faster than galaxy s. Still all of them were smooth and fast already.

And why you are saying symbian doesnt need faster, what about other apps and games etc?

for example need for speed shift last loading point takes 25 second to load. IPhone 4 do same with 6 second, almost no waiting just play. i bet galaxy s2 do same but i didn't find any video for galaxy s2 running shift.

Every platform can nowdays run their OS smoothly, is not the big thing, you need to run much more than OS, smoothly and fast.

Of course when nokia puts those 1ghz processors it's going to be very good, but because nokia doesn't have them now, actually you dont need it, same old same old.

You know here is also users who got used to use those fast phones, why want to go back to use stone aged hardware?

If it's enough for you true nokiafans ok, but many many others want to nokia get their parts updated, because they are not going to buy those outdated phones.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-06 15:34
  • p77X

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-06-06 14:55 from MHxt - click to readNokia users care about flash? right? so why don't enjoy full flash smoothly instead, flash lite laggy as hell.

Look how smoothly galaxy s2 can run flash, it's awesome. Do you think they could do that with 680mhz processor? i dont think so.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-06 15:22
  • p77X

> In reply to Technogeek001 @ 2011-06-06 11:14 from iFn4 - click to readListen it has a 680mhz CPU because it needs just that. Symbian does not need 1.2ghz processors as its less heave than android!

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-06 15:18
  • Sarx

> In reply to Zong @ 2011-06-06 10:05 from U3xT - click to readprobably.. but i do not like somebody else (especially vendors) to direct my choice. I mean i do not like an advertising wispering in my ear "man, that new iPhone is so cool, you MUST have it", or "Droid rocks, you do not if you miss it". I like to have some "smart features" on my phone, but leading role of that device is communication, not computation. Music listening is a viable usage option, but again.... the only reason to ask for more than 1 speaker is to show off. that is insanely STUPID!!!

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-06 15:10
  • Svec

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-06-06 07:52 from t7X2 - click to readYou don't know a thing i can see .Screen resolution ,amount of ram processor etc. has nothing to do with Symbian .Its just Nokia that decided to create mobiles with those specs and you can not compare a mid-range phone with high-end android smartphone . As for the OS look is your personal opinion if you like it or not in my opinion its better than android.Although Symbian is behind other os's it can run at those low spec phones while android 2.3 can't without lugging a lot (more than Symbian does).And Symbian does have a descend ecosystem ,a satisfying amount of apps (without viruses) ,there 's actually no point having 300000 apps , and halve of them having duplicates that do exactly the same thing.yes i am disappointed about Nokia abandoning their OS and moving with Microsoft, as all of us do and so we decided to move with other brands(but no other brand has the same build quality as Nokia does)

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-06 15:07
  • SXpM

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.