News - Reader comments

Is the Nexus 4G Google's third phone? Specs get detailed

15 June, 2011 | Read the news | Post your comment
Is the Nexus 4G Google's third phone? Specs get detailed - read the full textTake this with a pinch of salt because there is no official source, people. The guys over at BGR claim that they have gotten some details on the specs of the third Nexus phone by Google. And it is almost needless to say that they look more than impressive. According to the BGR source, the...

 

Sort by:

As current rumored Specs stand it would fall woefully short of being cutting edge. Let's hope Google and (Samsung) whomever manufactures the next Google phone takes heed. Although nice that it will have ICS (A-v4.0) without pushing the hardware envelope it'll pale against then current devices. Its understandaable it won't include the 4-core KaEl but 5MP when most topine phones are launching at 8MP? And 720p rather than 1080p or I? Persoannly if its to be a "huge" display and utilize Android 4.0 then it needs to be the be-all and end-all not just another so-so device. Come on Google....Push The Envelope

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-18 16:29
  • kAnJ

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-06-17 01:27 from 3HEF - click to readI've still got my nokia n95 downstairs!

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-18 04:15
  • vCAb

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-06-17 01:55 from k76e - click to readWrong. Some NOKIA cellphones had 1Mpx cameras in the past. 1 Mpx cameras exist.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-17 18:58
  • GLQV

Iffy specs. There is no such thing as a 1 megapixel front facing camera resolution. It's not standard. It either has to be 0.3, 1.3, or 2 megapixels.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-17 01:55
  • k76e

my n95 with really old 5mp camera takes better pictures than most 8 megapixel phones now. My point is the sensor and the lens are way more important than the megapixel count.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-17 01:27
  • 3HEF

For all of you bashing the camera and for the person who wrote this article, the number of megapixels doesn't mean squat. A larger and better quality sensor and a good lens on a 5mp will beat anything above it if it doesn't use quality parts. The reason most phone pictures don't look that great is because they use cheap parts compared to most full size cameras.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-16 19:49
  • 8iJA

Let me tell to you, it's going to be tablet, whith long last battery, who would make such half-way smartphones anyway?

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-16 18:58
  • mh$0

Nokia totally sucks , camera or no camera .

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-16 15:43
  • vwwB

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-06-16 14:33 from msWH - click to readTru2dat.SE stop taking photography serious a while bk....that sucks:(I kno they can do much better......what d hell itz Sony.....Make Believe!!!

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-16 14:58
  • jxXT

But Se's cameras are so overrated. K750i was great, but K800 had iso set to 400 when strobe was used, K850i and newer flagships had cheap matrices and plenty of chroma noise. It seams that only Nokia and Samsung care about photography in phones these days, arc's quality is joke, typical lack of detail and chroma noise, like 200X sony cameras.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-16 14:33
  • msWH

I don't think it matters how good they say it is, consumers who want a good camera phone won't buy it with only 5 mega pixels.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-16 14:30
  • 2G5H

Sound nice.True or false the next Google phone will be great.I am a SE fan but using HTC Desire HD because my x10 got stolen:(The desire iz really nice,I like it a lot.Still waiting on SE to release a n8 kill/galaxy s2 kill.How bout a 16mp dual core 1.5ghz,4-4.5" screen with hd quallity,1080p @30fps,as thin as possible with xenon flash,a great battery,8gb rom& 1gb ram.Something2make ppl jaw drop......I dreaming right:)Well SE needs 2get bk doing what they use2do.....be#1.Other brands great,just like SE better.Oh an release both wp7&android latest OS versions of the monster phone:)

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-16 14:23
  • jxXT

> In reply to joonius @ 2011-06-16 11:06 from qbY5 - click to readNokia may be struggling but they have full offline map support for lots of countries, build quality is very good, decent internals with loudspeakers and call quality which put others to shame. They have good battery life and they are very competent devices even with an older UI.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-16 13:21
  • dT1X

low camera makes low profit

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-16 13:21
  • YiXk

> In reply to [deleted post]I do agree with u, nokia do have the uperhand in caneras as n8 or n82 .
I used to have a 6700 with the 5 mp camera it is one of the best .

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-16 13:17
  • SqJ$

> In reply to [deleted post]maybe the battery sucks and a little of the looks but its one of the best phones in terms of camera quality. u must be joking.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-16 11:55
  • v@Hh

> In reply to dra3b @ 2011-06-16 10:50 from fqhC - click to readdid you try the xperia arc 8mp sensor? After n8 i think it s the next best thing. Dont forget sony has a 16mp sensor coming soon. if the next nexus is htc am gonna buy it because i currently using nexus 1.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-16 11:09
  • 860L

OMAP4460 is TI's SoC, not Qualcomm's

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-16 11:06
  • 0@iD

> In reply to dra3b @ 2011-06-16 10:50 from fqhC - click to readCamera isn't a main feature of a smartphone... figure it out. Most photos taken by mainstream smartphones are more than enough Facebook album worthy.

Nokia fans... Camera's all you got.

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-16 11:06
  • qbY5

simply rumors...I still believe that Nexus 3 will be set up by Tegra 3 / kal-el

  • Reply
  • 2011-06-16 10:52
  • IWbB

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.