News - Reader comments

Palm unveils Treo 500v for Vodafone

Palm unveils Treo 500v for Vodafone - read the full textPalm announced today the Palm Treo 500v, a 3G smartphone running on Windows Mobile 6 Standard. The device has its design redone and offers enhanced communication and multimedia capabilities. In Treo 500v, Palm has for the first time given up the square touchscreen display and stylus, choosing a...

 

Sort by:

does this phone has the wi-fi feature?

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-26 06:49
  • u73T

to bad, palm is already 50 years behind in giving a gadgets of tommorrow

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-16 10:16
  • w0P%

Since 2000 I have been a Palm Fan (V-505-Clie-T3-TX). However, Palm is suffering from not further update of the OS. The TX was a disaster, far from beeing stable. OS5 is missing real multitasking.
The split of Palm into PALM ONE and PALM SOFT (I forgot the real name) has not shown any benefit to the user. OS6, almost ready years ago, was never use by any hardware.
So PALM has missed the chance to convert their loyal users into smartphone users. After several years of waiting I gave up and I am now using the SonyEricsson P990, which is all what I expected.

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-14 21:48
  • pRaI

For all who wants everything in one package I would recommend HTC TYTN, especially now, when TYTN II is coming out soon.

Personally, I LOVE my TYTN.

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-14 06:04
  • q2HX

No more Palm OS
No more TS

Too sad, the used to be "Leader" in PDA devices has now been...
:(

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-13 06:58
  • 2A3m

No Quad band GSM??????

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-12 23:57
  • 4h%u

i hope it has not that much problems like the treo 680. i work for orange switzerland and we had once to change the 680 !5! times and the fifth one still wasnt working correctly. specially the akku is very weak...

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-12 23:11
  • n1xL

such a nice and good looking phone and no wifi?!?!?!?!?
i'd buy if it had wifi... now i'm "forced" to consider again the samsung i600 and the htc s710...

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-12 22:37
  • prPb

looks good, maybe a good cheap alternative

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-12 20:32
  • w1Ra

the third

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-12 19:46
  • Sjrq

this phone is a lite bit discosting,and didnt have wifi yet grong

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-12 19:04
  • LX1{

The first !!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-09-12 18:48
  • Ma$n

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.