News - Reader comments

Ignis announces 300ppi true RGB pixel AMOLED

29 November, 2011 | Read the news | Post your comment
Ignis announces 300ppi true RGB pixel AMOLED - read the full textIgnis Innovation has just announced that it has developed an AMOLED screen with a pixel density of over 300 ppi that uses a conventional RGB matrix. So far, the only AMOLEDs that boasted such density were using the often criticized PenTile matrix. The newly announced screen also features a new...


Sort by:

is this flexible?
if not dont manufacture this...

  • Reply
  • 2011-12-01 12:03
  • vGnb

So what's next, true motion display?

  • Reply
  • 2011-12-01 08:58
  • HvX$

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-11-30 03:59 from YPb1 - click to readHTC's Rezound has been available since November 14th. I have one and will be getting the Galaxy Nexus as well. I'm a fan of great devices, so if that makes me a fanboy, oh well. Sue me. You are too funny though. Not knowing what devices are out on the market while confidently spreading false information killed any credibility you may have had. No one takes you serious anymore...pretender.

  • Reply
  • 2011-12-01 04:35
  • 4bVx


  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 16:19
  • mARF

> In reply to Terminator @ 2011-11-29 19:12 from TL5j - click to readBecause I'm a well connected person. It's not what you know but who you know in this world darling.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 15:04
  • SwRE

get this. you need it desperately.
you dont need to pay a dime for it, and from your language, it looks like you wont be able to either.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 12:40
  • vbMr

> In reply to aaa @ 2011-11-30 09:07 from uWCG - click to readThat's quite a nonsense. One of main disadvantage of AMOLED is the price. LCD is relatively cheaper, even IPS.
The reaseon why the manufacturers swtiching to AMOLED is that OLED is technically superior than LCD although it costs a bit more. We are in the era that the industry switches LCD to OLED. The supply of AMOLED is short(=selling extremely well), so a few company hasn't switched yet. However, the time will come.

by the way, Sony is getting supplied by Samsung. They do share factories.
Samsung&LG are the standard of this industry. If you really want to come up with a decent japanese company then it should be Sharp, which operates the factory and invest heavily in the industry.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 10:45
  • YPb1

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-11-30 08:28 from q8QD - click to readActually, I haven't heard anyone complained about their TVs from any brands(yep any brands and manufacturers) due to its over-saturation. Yep, most of merdern "Plasma" TVs have over-saturated display.

You are experiencing same quality and techs that are used in modern TVs. Why should we complain about it rather than appreciate it. I know, the haters will hate anything that is possible...

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 10:30
  • YPb1

samsung is making foolish the world day by day.most of componeies go to samsung for mobile display is due to the samsung provide cheeper display as low cast and using himself a very cheep and low cast display.i wonder on those people who praise samsung,actully the most of people having cheeper mind,go to standard and check sony and other japani componies,they never compromise on quality even price is high and sail becum down..

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 09:07
  • uWCG

> In reply to etotherescue @ 2011-11-29 20:40 from kPnY - click to readSeriously. And in most places they refer to it as it's own screen type! Retina is not a display type and is not apples! Just like anything else apple. lol.

And Best screen would definitely be a Samsung Super Amoled Plus Screen. And they really are not that over saturated.. lcd's are just that washed up. they are slightly over vivid, but barely.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 08:28
  • q8QD


hey brainak ! the retina display is Apple technology desing and patented by them.
of course another factory make it for them

as for samsung display, the technology and patents came from Sony Displays and in return samsungproduces sony displays in their factory.

In other words you have no idea what you talking about.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 07:02
  • PPU5

> In reply to Sun Down @ 2011-11-30 05:52 from PF5p - click to readNokia CB Amoled = Motorola Amoled = Samsung Amoled.
Apple Cinema = Apple Retina = LG IPS LCD
HTC S-LCD = Sony Bravia = Samsung S-LCD(original manufacturer)

Manufacturers re-names it around, but the truth is that there is only two major manufacturers proving all displays in the industry. Samsung & LG.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 06:44
  • YPb1

I wonder how awesome this would be if mixed with Nokia's ClearBlack display. If that's possible at all, it'll put Apple's Cinema display to shame. It'll even put Adobe RGB to shame.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 05:52
  • PF5p

i think the new i phone 5 s screen from sony

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 04:16
  • fC$J

> In reply to 1337 @ 2011-11-30 03:45 from 4bVx - click to readActually, LG says LG's "Nova" display which is basically just another name of LCD(IPS) is better than "Retina" display. It is used for Optimus Black, but the people don't recognize it somehow...strange...

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 04:07
  • YPb1

90% of (Am)oled market is owned by Samsung and most of patents are owned by Samsung.

Who was marketing the improved OLED as AMOLED and pioneering the market? Of course Samsung.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 04:03
  • YPb1

> In reply to 1337 @ 2011-11-30 03:36 from 4bVx - click to readHTC fanboy comes up with the phone that hasn't released yet. By the way, S-LCD is just lcd(VA) which is made by Samsung.

Amoled > S-LCD, Samsung, the manufacturer of both displays confirms itself. The Capple makes the hype of pixel density, because they know they can't compete with Amoled in contrast, viewing angle, ratio and hips. At that size of screen, you wouldn't recognize the number of pixels anyway.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 03:59
  • YPb1

> In reply to etotherescue @ 2011-11-29 20:40 from kPnY - click to readExactly. Thank you. With LG preparing to release the Nitro HD and Optimus 4G LTE, it matches Apple's "Retina Display" in terms of pixel density. The kicker is that the display on both of those devices are going to be 720x1280 @ 4.5-inches. That won't be as sharp as the Rezound, but definitely better than Apple's Retina.

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 03:45
  • 4bVx

> In reply to apple 'o' holic @ 2011-11-29 15:04 from 3JYg - click to readApple's "Retina Display" is decent for its size and resolution, but it is not the best display by any stretch of the imagination. Its LED backlit IPS TFT LCD has become a joke @ 3.5-inches. Furthermore, 640×960 pixel resolution is mediocre at best. It's not as bad as 480x800, but not close to 720x1280 at all. Having a ~326 ppi pixel density means nothing on such a small screen. It's thoroughly laughable.

Best screen on the market right now...

HTC Rezound:

Display Type S-LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
Size 720 x 1280 pixels, 4.3 inches (~342 ppi pixel density)

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 03:36
  • 4bVx

> In reply to etotherescue @ 2011-11-29 20:40 from kPnY - click to readNice point, dude :D

  • Reply
  • 2011-11-30 03:15
  • PGg1

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.