News - Reader comments

Samsung Galaxy S III to be 7mm thin, rumors say

06 February, 2012 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung Galaxy S III to be  7mm thin, rumors say - read the full textIt seems that thinness is the new race to the moon for smartphone makers, and Samsung, not to be outdone by Motorola's RAZR XT910 7.1mm waistline, is reportedly aiming at the 7mm milestone with the new Galaxy S III. Surprisingly, Huawei is also in the race with the upcoming Ascend P1 S, which comes...

 

Sort by:

sony and motorola has ture colur. no one can bat .also cannot bet for sony .sony android phone phones batterys can run 2 day s with internet usage.even moto. but these 2 brands have good colur system

  • Reply
  • 2012-03-24 04:46
  • IWSv

Agreed with the Samsung much better

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-24 16:00
  • 3IDj

> In reply to mobistarman @ 2012-02-09 14:19 from p@38 - click to readUnfortunately Sony have made a real mess of Android devices up to now despite promising specs

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-09 14:37
  • DVqg

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-02-09 02:58 from Ia90 - click to readLook up Sony Xperia S, it makes sharkfood out of every and any galaxy you compare it to. ok, you said SonE, but still

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-09 14:19
  • p@38

> In reply to jm @ 2012-02-07 20:47 from 3JKQ - click to readI'm pretty sure you just don't like the idea of a Galaxy doing everything and anything better than your favourite the Xperia, cause you're a fanboy. Cause let's be honest here, no SonE handset ever touched a Galaxy.

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-09 02:58
  • Ia90

who cares about thin we need better batteries

and finally to run power hungry android we need power

2gb ram

2.5 cpu speed dualcore

lag will never exsist on android

we wana play with power

samsung

give it to us please

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-09 02:36
  • 0CD8

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-02-07 17:00 from 0BGT - click to readAll I can say is "you can't please all of the people all of the time but you can please some of the people, sometimes"...

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-08 15:26
  • 3AxW

The Motorola Razr comes with Kevlar and minimal palstic ( using one right now) Samsung Galaxy (used earlier) has a lot of palstic and looks and feels cheap. And yes- Smartphones need more battery so they should re look at that.

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-08 12:12
  • 2ZaG

All we need from new Samsung is better battery (so that phone lasts for atleast 1.5 days with single charge) and a better camera.. rest of the things has already been done by google in ICS

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-08 11:24
  • A9kh

after this time I just care battery time, I have to switch 2-3 batteries per day with my S2, pathetic, but real :(

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-08 09:31
  • 0GJ@

Yes correct source. The S3 will be SLIMMER, slightly bigger and apparently plastic due to it's heavy hardware inside. Design was supposed to be METAL but would be MUCH heavier than normal phones. Since it has SO MUCH good hardware inside, plastic is the best choice. Specs wise? Quadcore, 2XXX battery LIFE. Will NOT be revealed MWC 2012, but will hold a PRESS conference BY Samsung so WATCH OUT and stay tuned!!!

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-08 09:00
  • inP4

razer max is thin with a big battery so i dont c y thir want b s3 max
or just use an extrnal battery

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-08 08:09
  • NrCV

So in summary, here's what we need:
-better cooling
-at least 2200-2300 mah, removable battery
-at least 4.3 display
-DECEND speaker (Think Motorola Milestone or Atrix...)
-better replaceable
-longer software support (updates)
Not much, is it? It won't even make it more expensive (Well no more than $10-20).
Now that would be a really TOP model. Of course we will never see one, because they want people to replace it a year later. And the only way they will change their policy is if people change their attitude and stop playing by their rules (Just don't buy...)

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-08 05:44
  • 0BGT

> In reply to jm @ 2012-02-07 20:47 from 3JKQ - click to readIt sucks also. Not only a small battery, but not even replaceable (And you can't put a bigget one, although the need to put a bigger one is an insult to the customer anyway - you spend tons of bucks and then you have to spend even more to make your phone usable?).
We really need to boycott all new smartphones until they start manufacturing something more than fashion products. I personally use a 2005 model and i have no plans replacing it. Went to the store a month ago to try some of the new "top" models. Man, they looked like child toys!

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-08 05:27
  • 0BGT

hello sammy,hello! hello!! hello,anybody home!!! I said,we said, the whole world said:
"Battery life". Are u listenning? !!!

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-08 05:04
  • IVxX

> In reply to et @ 2012-02-07 21:19 from sGVi - click to readi agree with you.....

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-08 04:50
  • Y20i

instead of making supper thin phone we need better camera & larger battery for and better display ............from SGS3...........

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-07 21:19
  • sGVi

i dont like the idea of thin smartphones. in this case im still sold in Sony Xperia S the best in its class

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-07 20:47
  • 3JKQ

after reading this rumor i came to the concussion that four can happen... 1) the sgs3 will suck because of it's short battery life... 2) the sgs3 will rock the tech world with it's amazing specs... 3) this is just a rumor and the sgs3 will be thicker than 7mm... 4) this is not the sgs3 and this is some ultra thin phone sammy's working on for the future

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-07 20:20
  • 0HW@

Samsung and Apple are always going a step ahead in smartphone's race; regarding almost all features, both brands have shown a new vista to all customers and other companies as well, in just a few last years game is always changing!! I just love both of them...! I wish that both companies settle their patent issues as early as possible becoz both are the best!!

  • Reply
  • 2012-02-07 18:53
  • KIYK

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.