LG Optimus 4X HD benchmarked early, does well
- PAULMURZA
- Report
- 0
quadrant is not requiring internet connection, please stop talking without knowing a thing
- Reply
- 2012-04-26 12:03
- 3ce%
- al.afsari
- Report
- 0
what ?? 4448 ?? it's not even my G-Note on official rom !! my benchmark is : 4778 on official rom
- Reply
- 2012-04-12 13:22
- HI9C
- Denzo
- Report
- 0
This is all well said, but I can't buy a LG just yet. So what's the point. In technology if its not out, its infinite.
- Reply
- 2012-04-12 10:14
- 2CF4
- Verbal_Criminal
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Verbal_Criminal @ 2012-04-12 09:47 from 9Lax - click to readhttp://www.gsmarena.com/htc_on...ews-4320.php
we appreciate your review....
have you done benchmarking already...quite curious mate
- Reply
- 2012-04-12 09:52
- 9Lax
- Verbal_Criminal
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Thornography @ 2012-04-11 18:27 from v@Hc - click to readyou just got your ONE X didyah?
you just posted a mini review that sounds live you want to replace the author for phone review.
of course you spent your moonies for that ONE X and that gives you right to brag about your device, errr.. since you paid for it.
- Reply
- 2012-04-12 09:47
- 9Lax
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Im pretty sure you need internet connection for Quadrant and Im pretty sure I dont see one in 4x screenies. Nor mobile data nor WiFi. FAKE?
- Reply
- 2012-04-12 03:44
- P}vn
- Sergio
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Selo oe @ 2012-04-11 16:41 from XMF9 - click to readDude, your sg2 use 480x800 pixels display and this 2 phones compared here use 720x1280... It's more than 537k pixels in difference. If you can put the same resolution in the sg2 i believe you didn´t take the same score.
- Reply
- 2012-04-11 22:49
- 88jM
- Thornography
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Selo oe @ 2012-04-11 16:41 from XMF9 - click to readGet real clown nobody is even comparing the GS2 with the one X and here u are out of the blue claiming to have a better experience from the s2 then the quad core tegra 3 one x relating to some benchmarks lol what has the world come to oh dear god! galaxy s3 wont get a significant amount better then the One X that is if it did get better. Considering that HTC cares more for its customers and gives more support ill stick with my One X. samsung only makes phone for what to leave them on 2.3 gingerbread when everyone else is on 4.0 ICS. It tells the samsung story perfectly.
- Reply
- 2012-04-11 18:27
- v@Hc
- Nishu11
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Optimus @ 2012-04-11 08:25 from 70ge - click to readHAHAHA.....your link says - page not found....please find a reliable source and then reply mate...and for your kind info sense is not that heavy anymore..please read more
- Reply
- 2012-04-11 17:07
- vG6a
- Selo oe
- Report
- 0
Sloww.. Even my sgs2 can beat both phone for 3d performance, my antutu scored 1278 and nenamark 51 fps, i think i'll skip and wait for sgs 3...
- Reply
- 2012-04-11 16:41
- XMF9
- LEORYO
- Report
- 0
the question is : that ultra high performance, what for???
- Reply
- 2012-04-11 16:29
- Ki5c
- hello world
- Report
- 0
Although LG's hardware is great, with a lack of LG's software development i say never ever LG again.(an unhappy Optimus 3D user with ghost calls and buggy software)
- Reply
- 2012-04-11 14:12
- 3xvd
- Thornography
- Report
- 0
I am really surprised by the stupidity of you people relying on benchmarks. if u read the reviews abt one x from the internet from different websites ull notice the benchmark scores posted here is less then what most of the reviews posted. in most if not all one x got above 11000 in antutu and around 5000 in quadrant. benchmarks are unreliable they give different results each time u test. if u don't believe me do a benchmark test 3 times and see the difference. don't u see what's happening HTC made a brilliant phone and the haters are trying their best to make it look bad do a research and u will understand.
- Reply
- 2012-04-11 12:55
- w7ia
- from Galaxy S2
- Report
- 0
What???
Quadrant. (LG 4x) 4512 to 4488 (One X)
24 of difference. (LG 4x) 0.53 % more than (One X)
I would say almost a tie.
AnTuTu. (LG 4x) 11147 to 10611 (One X)
536 of difference. (LG 4x) 5.05 % more than (One X)
A big difference.
NenaMark2. (LG 4x) 44.5 fps to 47.6 fps (One X)
3.1 fps of difference. (One X) 6.97 % more than (LG 4x)
A bigger difference.
Adding all, the One X wins by a small difference.
Sorry for my English I'm from Uruguay.
- Reply
- 2012-04-11 11:15
- 8xnP
- hawx
- Report
- 0
not much of a difference my s2 scores 4433 on quadrant on stock @ 1.2ghz exynos rules waiting for exynos 2 maybe ;P
- Reply
- 2012-04-11 10:38
- fqxH
- Optimus
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Nishu11 @ 2012-04-11 06:43 from vG6a - click to readi think u need to think before u write here .! YES 4X supporting Bluetooth 4.0 (http://www.knowyourcell.com/ne...isplay.html)
Plus its just depending on personal , for me i dont like sense UI as its too heavy. PLUS as performance its identical with One X ( they both have same tegra 3 with same IPS screen with same pixel density)
- Reply
- 2012-04-11 08:25
- 70ge
- Nishu11
- Report
- 0
> In reply to TUSHARR23 @ 2012-04-11 03:07 from fCxM - click to readIt doesnt have BT 4.0....its still 2.1, check d videos or other reviews and stuff....then talking about quality, ONE x is far better then this....@everyone else--its ok that everyone has his personal choice but what about the ugly LG UI thats even worse then Motoblur.....IT cant match up SENSE in coming light years....BENCHMARKS---haha, these are funny scores that are just for boasting on papers....even my brothers evo 3d is faster then my other brothers Gs2 in real life.Also the scores here are quite low because i watched almost 5-6 benchmarks videos of onex in which scores were above 4800.
- Reply
- 2012-04-11 06:43
- vG6a
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
Login with
Facebook
Google
Sign up