News - Reader comments

Is this a live photo of Samsung Galaxy S III?

13 April, 2012 | Read the news | Post your comment
Is this a live photo of Samsung Galaxy S III? - read the full textJust as we started to get a bit worried about the lack of Samsung Galaxy S III leaks for the past three days or so, our luck struck again. Get your salt ready, because here goes an alleged live photo of the upcoming Samsung top dog, courtesy of a person, who claims to be a device tester. As...

 

Sort by:

> In reply to reza079 @ 2012-04-16 21:33 from Kh2B - click to readYeah? N wp or symbian or ios r absolutely bug free. U r talking as if ur a know-it-all when actually it isnt so. It appears to me that u r sumone trying to act oversmart. N its actually u who started taking the agressive path. Either u discuss the points u r trying to convey n politely so or stop posting crap. N another thing is that u r absolutely no one to ask me to leave so hold ur tongue.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-16 21:45
  • Hkq2

> In reply to GDT @ 2012-04-16 20:37 from Hkq2 - click to readi told u, ur behave like a kid. no need to grownup. cause ur growing age is gone.... ur behave like a owner of samsung brand. u took personally. i can tell a lot bug of samsung and consumer waiting for debugging, thats world wide. i am telling about worldwide & u r thinging about ur local area. i asked u have u any thinking ability? u proved u don.t have that and u don't need to think. i read a lot of post of u. i am clear about u how much u know? so that why i tried to avoid u to inform in details. so bugger off.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-16 21:33
  • Kh2B

> In reply to reza079 @ 2012-04-16 18:58 from Kh2B - click to readDude u actually need a phsychiatrist. What exactly am i supposed to think? U might b living in an underdeveloped place, where services might nt b that gud, for all i care. N really no one cares whether u like samsung or nt especially when 91 million ppl hav chosen samsung over others just this quarter thus making it the top mobile vendor. So just stop harping abt it. N what exactly am i supposed to understand abt android? That its worse than wp? In that case, m nt gonna bother trying to discuss anything with u. The reviews from umpteen reviewers ought to b enough to make u see some sence provided u hav the required amount of brains.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-16 20:37
  • Hkq2

> In reply to GDT @ 2012-04-15 10:58 from Hkqh - click to readif Your Samsung provide good service just only few place of the world than is that brand as a consumer friendly brand for globally. what u think? have u any thinking ability? if u don't have than stop writhing here and there, don't misled innocent people.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-16 18:58
  • Kh2B

> In reply to Tizen Takeover @ 2012-04-16 01:39 from jxxN - click to readleave the GDT. he don't know nothing about any mobile OS. he is just speaking like another free lancer online reporter. just collecting information from other source and keep buggering. another thing is he never try to understand.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-16 18:53
  • Kh2B

its fake chinese galaxy s

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-16 17:11
  • L1gL

I'm not sure.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-16 13:28
  • PBTX

> In reply to Tizen Takeover @ 2012-04-16 01:39 from jxxN - click to readif u really have been following my posts, then u will see that i have already mentioned androids primary flaw....its security.....n no matter how much u say that i have been throwing insults at u the fact remains that u have been unable to point out any of those. but really , this conversation has become pretty useless. i never intended to dicuss my english skills, n the fact that u r using that as an edge just goes to show that u r just arguing without reason just for the heck of it. u say my english is poor,fine, i never said i was a shakesphere. but i think its still good enough to b understood by others......n if ur just gonna reply with an insight on what kind of a person i am....dont bother waiting for a reply.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-16 07:11
  • u7J3

Hope they go for 1280x800 instead of 720p. And pleeeaase exynos 5 dual core instead of exynos 4 quadcore. Quadcores are for marketing to gullible people.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-16 06:29
  • sR1t

Nova Launcher.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-16 02:34
  • PSk%

> In reply to GDT @ 2012-04-15 07:26 from Hkq7 - click to readYou said I was an Ex-member which is what I was clearly asking. Again, so much for your reading and comprehension skills.

Anyway, yeah you are a blind fanboy and yes you were throwing around empty insults just like a blind fanboy.

I bet you can't even pull yourself to say one of the cons of Android. But I'm not here to single you out as a blind fanboy, you already know you are so I need not waste anymore time on that.

My point now is, Android isn't the savior of mobile OS' like most blind Android fanboys will have people believe. It's a great OS, there's no denying that but it has plenty of problems still.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-16 01:39
  • jxxN

Fail. That's the Galaxy S II HD, probably running CM9. Definitely NOT the Galaxy S III.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-16 00:14
  • PZw5

Just can´t wait!!!!!!1

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 23:00
  • LCxj

Pretty sure this is fake - look how the alignment of the screen is wonky compared to the phone body

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 18:22
  • 3x1K

Next generation HD super amoled + display MUST be (1280x960)pix!!!.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 18:00
  • nSRf

> In reply to blurry.n @ 2012-04-15 01:07 from qpsL - click to readFake!

As for the phone size:
Yes, 4.2" is really max of max for a phone.
If they're gonna use the no bezel approach then SGS3 should be as big as SGS1 with 4.3" 720p screen.
I don't like HTC One X 4.6" monster (I really don't like to comment on Galaxy Note) :/

"Smaller is better!"

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 13:17
  • 3pw6

All I really prioritize for is a fat 2500+ mAh battery. More likely its a mini-upgrade from 1650 to 1750-1850mAh. If the latter is true, Im gonna switch to the Motorola MAXX 3300mAh monster.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 12:11
  • m}G8

> In reply to mango @ 2012-04-14 19:34 from uk8% - click to readI agree if this is bigger then GSII, 4.2 is the max size i will buy as a phone really.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 11:30
  • pEZ@

> In reply to reza079 @ 2012-04-15 09:20 from Kh2B - click to readTo each his own. Maybe the area u live in might nt hav all that good services so ur dislike maybe justified. I ,on the other hand, live in a place where after sale services r excellent n i found sammy's services bttr than most.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 10:58
  • Hkqh

> In reply to GSM2012 @ 2012-04-14 20:40 from m57p - click to readTo create the illusion of deception.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 10:22
  • gxwA

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.