News - Reader comments

Sony LT29i Hayabusa camera shots leaked

14 April, 2012 | Read the news | Post your comment
Sony LT29i Hayabusa camera shots leaked - read the full textWe're already aware that Sony aren't holding back in the wake of their rebirth as Sony Mobile Communications and with four devices already toting either an 'available' or 'coming soon' status, we know that they're keeping themselves busy. Based on some leaked camera samples and a few other...


Sort by:

sorry but the xperia s is boring. After sony dropping ericsson you would think the next phone would be very different. different design, name etc. But its not its virtually the same with a better spec.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 14:25
  • 3AxW

> In reply to Latvian @ 2012-04-15 11:00 from SeWu - click to readOne X over XPERIA S? You mad?

Better screen(More PPI and bravia engine), better design, better camera, PS Certified, better sound quality (Xloud, surround sound and Pro equalizer), FM Radio, more cloud storage, better bundles including Smarttags, MicroHDMI Cable, Car charger and a screen protector apart from the preloaded one and fast charge capability. Only thing One X has better is Quadcore, which I don't need for Angry Birds and ICS which is shadowed by Sense 4..

Lol S2 is a joke compared to 2012 phones. Outdated screen, hardware, design, camera, no NFC and much more..

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 14:00
  • Hxcb

> In reply to Quicky @ 2012-04-15 13:45 from mpcq - click to readXperia S is not failure

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 13:46
  • nTpT

Hopefully they make this smaller and thinner than the Xperia S, otherwise it'll just be another failure.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 13:45
  • mpcq

> In reply to Latvian @ 2012-04-15 11:00 from SeWu - click to readyou comparation is totaly wrong. grown up!

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 13:25
  • gJfE

> In reply to abbas @ 2012-04-15 11:48 from st88 - click to readIt's not correct this comparation because One S is low resolution than One X.... but you can make this comparation: One X (Tegra3) vs One XL from AT&T(with S4). Tegra 3 is better than S4 only in CPU speed and 3D grafics. This are the results One XL (AT&T S4) Total: 4912, CPU: 8521, Mem: 7266, I/O: 5527, 2D: 1042, 3D: 2196 / One X(Tegra 3) Total: 4217, CPU: 11269, Mem: 2623, I/O: 3829, 2D: 943, 3D: 2420

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 13:23
  • gJfE

> In reply to abbas @ 2012-04-15 11:48 from st88 - click to readPlus you must see the software optimization side of Sony Mobile engineers.
See the HUGE difference of benchmarks of Xperia S against the same chipset MSM8260 that HTC used? Sony Mobile knows how to squeeze every ounce of performance of its device. Its way better for sure.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 12:42
  • 7XbE

S 4 chip with krait processor has so much benefit over tegra3 quad core.even in benchmark,speed,energy saving..just compare one s to one x in this site review that one s perform better. So using s4 dual core is better than tegra3 quad core for is the best

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 11:48
  • st88

sony rocks !!!
i love u sony !!!

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 11:38
  • IVQU

> In reply to grif @ 2012-04-15 11:26 from fXu4 - click to readI didnt say duel core was pointless, but two phones with the same proccessor with not much diffrences.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 11:34
  • nIPk

> In reply to Bob @ 2012-04-15 10:53 from nIPk - click to readthere's nothing pointless about dual core.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 11:26
  • fXu4

I think its good of sony not jumping on the quad core band wagon like the rest when dual core still has so much to offer.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 11:23
  • fXu4

> In reply to Latvian @ 2012-04-15 11:00 from SeWu - click to readFrom my understanding the human eye cannot see the diffrence after 300ppi pixel density, so it may be technically better but you wont know the diffrence.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 11:20
  • nIPk

> In reply to Latvian @ 2012-04-15 11:00 from SeWu - click to readFirst of all, the screen of Xperia S is the best screen ever Samsung 3 will use the same crap AMoled screen witch is not better than Xperia S screen.

So don't get hyped about the SG3 screen :-)

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 11:09
  • mG@@

Well according to many tests new S4 dual core >> other quad cores, so I think we don't need slower quad cores which consumes more power :P
Personally I'm waiting for new Walkman Player and I hope it will have at least same spec of this Hayabusa (or even better) :D

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 11:00
  • ixRU

> In reply to [deleted post]Did you know Samsung Galaxy S2 has better screen than HTC One S? HTC has pentile screen, but Samsung does not.

Galaxy S2 camera photos are higher quality than One S camera photos. Since Samsung improve their phones with every generation, I can clearly tell Galaxy S3 will definitely be better than HTC One S.

1. Samsung Galaxy S3
2. HTC One X / Samsung Galaxy S2
3. Sony Xperia S
5. HTC One S / iPhone 4S

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 11:00
  • SeWu

I know we still dont have the full details of Hayabusa, but it seems pointless to me to bring out another duel core phone which is clocked at the same speed. So i think itll be a higher clock or quad core as this is ment to be the companys flagship bad boy from what ive been reading.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 10:53
  • nIPk

> In reply to asingha94 @ 2012-04-15 07:08 from t@Jx - click to readIf all i wanted from a phone was a good camera, i'll get a DSLR and a simple phone instead. Stop bashing about N8 on every post, it's annoying

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 10:52
  • ib36

I bet the Hayabusa will be super awesome and will have a monster baterry with +2500mAh. Sony is the best!

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 10:26
  • SvBn

> In reply to [deleted post]One series performance, camera and build quality sucks. Why should it be on top? HTC is also losing a huge amount of money because of its overpriced products lol

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-15 09:41
  • PEHx

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.