News - Reader comments

Samsung announces new quad-core Exynos 4 Quad processor

26 April, 2012 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung announces new quad-core Exynos 4 Quad processor - read the full textSamsung has announced its next generation Exynos processor that will be powering its next Galaxy smartphone. The Exynos 4 Quad comes with four Cortex A9 cores that can go up to 1.4GHz individually and is based on Samsung's 32nm HKMG fabrication process. The Exynos 4 Quad, also known as the...

 

Sort by:

> In reply to Cezar @ 2012-04-26 10:56 from LaL$ - click to readits galaxy note

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 12:35
  • wdSb

> In reply to Cezar @ 2012-04-26 10:56 from LaL$ - click to readIts Samsung Galaxy Note

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 12:22
  • 3xBm

> In reply to usman @ 2012-04-26 10:58 from uWxM - click to readThe test results i carried out on my htc one x show to be the faster phone currently out there.

The only issue with this phone, it seems that the screen when is bright seems to drain the battery quite quick, otherwise battery can last much longer then my samsung galaxy ace.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 12:19
  • Snh6

guys, samsung made a blooper and accidentally leaked full specs on antutu.

i've uploaded screen caps ive taken on my note over at this link.

http://forum.xda-developers.co...postcount=21

if you dont believe me, download antutu and see it for yourself. it also shows what the galaxy s3 (may) look like.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 12:17
  • tZqk

> In reply to Cezar @ 2012-04-26 10:56 from LaL$ - click to readIts a Galaxy Note

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 12:16
  • 0FxU

> In reply to ColdreaverFelblade @ 2012-04-26 11:37 from 7tRp - click to readi have read recently that tegra 3 had some problems with the performance and battery usage but the update have been made and you can download it
it will enhance the cpu performance and increase battery duration.

the review of the one x was made before the update unfortunately but the one s have a better camera i thought the two cameras must be the same hoping it is only a software problem to be fixed later on.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 12:12
  • SHLn

> In reply to Cezar @ 2012-04-26 10:56 from LaL$ - click to readits galaxy note .. no s3

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 11:59
  • 3bmh

i think that on 1:11 is the galaxy note, i'm not 100% secure,but i own a Note ant they lok the same

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 11:58
  • pFUB

> In reply to Cezar @ 2012-04-26 10:56 from LaL$ - click to readthat was galaxy note, not s3

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 11:53
  • YMHU

> In reply to nottynag @ 2012-04-26 11:42 from PGjX - click to readThank you sir, I only try to make sense.
=)

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 11:51
  • 7tRp

> In reply to Karate Obachi @ 2012-04-26 10:19 from miZ0 - click to readlast time i checked, midway through the lawsuits apple decided to ditch samsung and swap over to TSMC.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 11:50
  • tZqk

Many people here do not seem to understand that screen resolutions make a big difference during benchmarking.

The S II scores high in benchmarks due to it's relatively lower resolution.

Benchmarks should NOT be used as deal breakers or makers.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 11:49
  • 7tRp

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-04-26 11:06 from nQe2 - click to readthe only companies that have the 28nm manufacturing process are TSMC and Global Foundries. Qualcomm chips are made at TSMC, hence 28nm. Samsung have their own 32nm fab, so they save money by doing it themselves, and they dont have to deal with all the crappy yield issues that TSMC have.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 11:49
  • tZqk

> In reply to Cezar @ 2012-04-26 10:56 from LaL$ - click to readdude, read the text on the screen. its not an S3, its a galaxy note. galaxy note uses the exynos 4210, which is technically still an exynos 4.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 11:46
  • tZqk

> In reply to Cezar @ 2012-04-26 10:56 from LaL$ - click to readthat's Galaxy Note

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 11:43
  • Gg86

> In reply to usman @ 2012-04-26 10:58 from uWxM - click to readyou are wrong man :D , s4 isn't more powerful than the one x , benchmark is sometimes higher because benchmarks apps wasn't opptimized yet for multicore device (( more than two )) and the resolution of the one x is double the one s , so in off screen benchmarks one x is higher

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 11:43
  • fvB}

> In reply to usman @ 2012-04-26 10:58 from uWxM - click to readTegra 3 is a horrible unfinished product?

The only reason that the One S beats the One X in benchmarks is that One X has a 720p resolution.
Comparitively, the One S has a much lower resolution.
The One X, with so many pixels to render, chugs along in benchmarks.
And even then it's a fast phone.

Plus, benchmarks are not indicative of real life performance.
They are only used to compare devices.

In terms of raw GPU power, the Tegra 3 beats the Adreno 225.

Your argument is invalid.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 11:37
  • 7tRp

> In reply to Cezar @ 2012-04-26 10:56 from LaL$ - click to readThat's the galaxy note, my friend, with Exynos 4 dual :D

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 11:30
  • th6B

> In reply to Cezar @ 2012-04-26 10:56 from LaL$ - click to readread, on the bottom it says its the GNote

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 11:20
  • Stkd

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.