News - Reader comments

Samsung announces new quad-core Exynos 4 Quad processor

26 April, 2012 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung announces new quad-core Exynos 4 Quad processor - read the full textSamsung has announced its next generation Exynos processor that will be powering its next Galaxy smartphone. The Exynos 4 Quad comes with four Cortex A9 cores that can go up to 1.4GHz individually and is based on Samsung's 32nm HKMG fabrication process. The Exynos 4 Quad, also known as the...

 

Sort by:

hmmm, hoped that we'd get 28 nano from samsung, but seems this it's too early for that, wonder if this one can beat the krait S4 found in one S and one XL,,,

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 11:06
  • nQe2

> In reply to aditya htc one s @ 2012-04-26 10:22 from U{Vg - click to readdo you know that one S beats the shit out of one X?? Which s2 also manages in a few benchmarks.... One S is currently the most powerful right now atleast cpu wise.... Tegra 3 is a horrible unfinished product which can't even beat dualcores....

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 10:58
  • uWxM

isn t that that s3 on 1:11 sec on this video? lol?:) i m first to notice or what:P

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 10:56
  • LaL$

there are a lot of smart asses here who comment on power efficiency and sorts, if you're that clever then come up with something, that is if your action are as big as your words

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 10:32
  • sF$u

Being pin compatible means it wount take much of Samsung's time to introduce 2nd version of Galaxy Note. In my openion that would be a real beast.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 10:30
  • Hxbt

Very happy for the fact they decided to go with 1.4 clockspeed rather then 1.8, to keep their promises of having at least 1 day full usage. (even at 1.4 its comparable to one x's 1.5 t3)

Now what they need is an option for expandable battery... then we can start overclocking ourselves to 1.8 but still retain battery life ;D

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 10:26
  • TRIi

> In reply to Mike @ 2012-04-26 08:07 from PSvM - click to readwho the hell are you to say dat htc one x cant beat gs2. .
Even htc one s can beat it.
( no offence )
=)

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 10:22
  • U{Vg

> In reply to haxkalibrr @ 2012-04-26 09:33 from d$xr - click to readIt baffles me when people keep comparing meego and Windows based phones to Android. I will agree with you they are very smooth, but that is only because they offer a fraction of the functionality and features that Android does. If you were to make these other OS.'s as feature rich as Android then you would need more processing power.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 10:21
  • 9Cn6

Interesting, but Apple's A5X has quad core GPU for better graphics. Ironic that both processors are manufactured by Samsung.

Time will tell which is the better option (more CPU cores vs more GPU cores)...

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 10:19
  • miZ0

> In reply to jbpianist28 @ 2012-04-26 10:00 from 2CER - click to readDude, I know my comment was long but I was actually saying the same thing as you; just read through.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 10:05
  • d$xr

> In reply to haxkalibrr @ 2012-04-26 09:33 from d$xr - click to readdont wow too much.. there a battery wasting thing... mobiles are not big computers, and thus do not need them
so these in a mobile device are gimmicks and just battery wasters...

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 10:00
  • 2CER

> In reply to beckon @ 2012-04-26 08:30 from UD}w - click to readThats because the new phones always come with bigger displays or other power consuming new features that eat this bonus.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 09:35
  • Sdfw

Wow! Samsung just keeps banking on the ignorance of the populace to increase phone sales. Only few comments here show people with a knowledge of electronics, programming and hardware optimization through software efficiency.
In my opinion, Quad-cores are not needed for better performance right now as optimizing for dual-cores is still difficult, even for some "very good" developers I know. And if you must know, most of your complaints about excessive power consumption is due to the fact that power is drained by inactive and inefficient cores used by programs not effectively designed for them( trust me, it's quite difficult to realize this task).
So like someone here said, Android could actually release a power efficient ICS FP and solve all these problems{ WP7 and the N9 Meego OSes are practical proofs of how good single cores can actually be if they run a good OS. Ask any Meego user, there is no hanging nor lag during ops, even at benchmark levels}.
As for gaming, I can optimize any MOBILE GAME to run as seamless on a dual core as on a Quad- saving at least 10% power. 2dayz GPU's are actually very good already. Just saying, wake up ppl, your phones don't overheat cos it's running a power demanding game, it is cos power waste is excessive. But then how many of you will actually consider the naked truth?

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 09:33
  • d$xr

Oh, an four cortex core cpu..........
The good'o A9 never dies huh.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 09:31
  • sF{m

I'm glad gsm arena didn't paraphrase and take blind guesses like engadget; They're adamant that this processor will power the galaxy s3 when it's announced on Thursday, even though no explicit reference to the device has been made.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 09:28
  • tA8D

So far I don't have much good feelings for Samsung smart phones (Galaxy S2) despite of its impressive benchmark results. However, with the introduction of Exynos 4 Quad processor to (expectedly) power Galaxy S3, is it worthy waiting for S3 or should I go for HTC One X?

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 09:15
  • RLnU

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-04-26 08:52 from PP0L - click to readyeah, keep waiting, by the time 32nm here, a better version will be announced will further keep you in limbo !

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 09:01
  • uWxJ

I waited so long for the HTC one x, was about to get one but....now i have to wait for this..
We are spoiled for choice! :)

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 08:52
  • PP0L

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-04-26 08:26 from 0Cb2 - click to readConsider yourself lucky you never bought an iphone.

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 08:49
  • w60y

wow its already faster than tegra3 as shown in antutu crown :D

  • Reply
  • 2012-04-26 08:34
  • svHt

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.