News - Reader comments

Motorola Mobility releases first quarter financial results

Motorola Mobility releases first quarter financial results - read the full textMotorola Mobility just announced its first quarter financial results for 2012 and things aren't looking so well. The total revenue in this period was of $3.1 billion (out of which $2.2 billion were from mobile devices) but the company faced a net operating loss of $85 million, $24 million...

 

Sort by:

Samsung and moto are best!go and show apple who is boss!

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 10:36
  • 60}%

Great hardware (try to handle a razr and you'll understand) but bad user interface customization: slow and with an old look...

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 10:35
  • nN29
  • Frustrated fanboyz?
  • Report
  • Rating0

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-05-02 10:11 from v0Xt - click to readDreaming or delusional? Or perhaps a little bit of both?

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 10:33
  • n%nx

> In reply to MARKETING SUCKS @ 2012-05-02 10:06 from T68X - click to readI totally agree with you Man

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 10:31
  • SqJ$

Just look at Samsung. They make all kind of phones, and this is their key to success. Motorola should do the SAME! I don't want Google to sell them to Huawei lol. I want Motorola to remain an American company. :) They don't make enough commercials as Samsung. Everybody has to admit the fact that Samsung's strategy is very good.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 10:29
  • Lax7

> In reply to Gowtham Natarajan @ 2012-05-02 10:08 from 4Q{t - click to read"I am talking abt phones which cost the same, like iphone and galaxy phones. Still Samsung sells more than apple"

well that's interesting, no they are not selling more. IPhone sold more this quarter than galaxy s2 ever, that's some realism.

Apple sells lot more hi-end phones than samsung.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 10:24
  • p77u

> In reply to Gowtham Natarajan @ 2012-05-02 10:08 from 4Q{t - click to readYepp, I agree, number of customers is important.
But more importantly, number of satisfied customer. Judging by the number of people waiting to buy next generation of galaxy s# and iphone #, I think both are equal.

Only fanboy that think one is better than the other.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 10:21
  • wrt9

Who cares. Motorola is my choice and will always be my choice. They are unique, and those who have internal sight will see their goddess. Ftw, Motorola. :)

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 10:17
  • RJ2Q

i love motorola phone .
go moto
goooooo

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 10:15
  • g52i

> In reply to Micronokia @ 2012-05-02 08:58 from U{7S - click to readyes nokia will back on #1 loool!

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 10:11
  • v0Xt

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-05-02 09:36 from p77u - click to readA person buys a bicycle if he cannot afford a car. I am talking abt phones which cost the same, like iphone and galaxy phones. Still Samsung sells more than apple. So, samsung is better.

We have to measure how good a company is by the number of phones they sell. It shows the number of customers they have. Not by measuring how much profit they make.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 10:08
  • 4Q{t

> In reply to andy88 @ 2012-05-02 09:53 from tVmN - click to readSamsung selling all kind of phones very cheap ones too which they make that market share=bikes.

But samsung cant sell hi-end phones as much as Apple=cars.

Apple doing a lot more money. Just like car sellers.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 10:06
  • p77u

The marketing strategies of Motorola sucks! yeah even they make icons like RAZR, BIONIC , DROID4, ATRIX,DEFY+ they lag miserably in marketing strategies.Need to learn marketing from nokia, samsung, apple who just makes high even a nothing phone by treating peoples eyes flashing advertisements.Only thing is people need to be wooed or else motorola could surely not taste the glory of past

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 10:06
  • T68X

> In reply to andy88 @ 2012-05-02 09:53 from tVmN - click to readAgreed. The comparison is all wrong. The right comparison should be like Samsung selling "high class car" whereas Apple selling "luxury car (which also happen a high class one)" (except that I don't know where the luxury point of iDevices. I just showing more exact comparison).

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 10:04
  • KLR9

In the time of symbian phones it was designe makeing phones unique. But now most of them looks the same. Most of them have same soft as well. So what make same of them so much popular and other not. It is media creating glory of sertn brands. It is huge money pusht in to it. Critiques and testers take a lot of money to "create briliant products ", unfortunately only in our mindes. So wake up people and choose what you like, becouse at the end of the day we all wrong. It is not Nokia or Samsung creating the best. phones.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 09:58
  • 3G%I
  • Frustrated fanboyz?
  • Report
  • Rating0

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-05-02 09:41 from 0Cb2 - click to readMost ridiculous thing I've ever heard, but expected from an equally ridiculous fanboy.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 09:57
  • n%nx

get rid of motoblur! get rid of motoblur! get rid of motoblur! or at least invite the choice of vanilla android

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 09:56
  • iLhn

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-05-02 09:36 from p77u - click to readSAmsung and apple is selling same product,not car compare with bike,beside that is apple decision to sell few product with overprice.THE fact isSamsung is still top phonemaker and they revenue will rise after galaxy s3 release

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 09:53
  • tVmN

samsung no.1 and it will remain always no matter ruling 14 yrs it has finally come to its expiry date nokia.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 09:41
  • U@Fc

> In reply to androsgs2 @ 2012-05-02 09:18 from vGxw - click to readsamsung is indeed for car drivers, cops, students, teens wich want to punch a talking cat and throw birds in pigs, using many many cores and many memory and many energy in order to carry the most fragmented and boring software ever created:android

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-02 09:41
  • 0Cb2

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.