News - Reader comments

The impressive Samsung Galaxy S III benchmarks are here

The impressive Samsung Galaxy S III benchmarks are here - read the full textThe Samsung Unpacked event is over and the Galaxy S III is now official. The new leader of the Samsung Android gang is powered by the new Exynos 4 Quad chipset, featuring four cores clocked at 1.4GHz and 1GB of RAM. Naturally, we were eager to check out if the SoC has the performance to cash...


Sort by:

ugliest phone.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 01:17
  • Xufd

really really disappointing..!!!! I am a great samsung fan and had planned to replace my SGS2 with new SGS3, had even registered with phones4u to get the device at earliest convenience but it's a crap, nothing so impressive, better to stay with my S2..:(((

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:59
  • HD%F

No GLbench? What sup with still using ol mali400, on GLbench tegra 3 will beat the crap out mali400, i'm not paying premium price for old gpu, sammy u should'v been better than this...geez!

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:56
  • Qxpq

The Samsung Galaxy Note II will kill this beast!

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:52
  • 46g3

Compare it with Ascend D quad and Meizu MX quad too in the July and we'll see if Samsung s3 can deal with them.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:52
  • iB2g

Well i think Samsung galaxy nexus is still the best looking phone and best value for money on the market. atleast with google flagship phones u can expect to be the first one to receive software updates.
S III just looks horrible from design perspective, and please get rid of those physical buttons ICS support on screen buttons and they work like a charm.
i love samsung desings but this one is just not worth it.... once iphone5 comes samsung will sure come out with S4
another lawsuit on the horizon....

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:42
  • bYJd

> In reply to Atepeye @ 2012-05-04 00:33 from P1j{ - click to readGood luck.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:38
  • mpUD

Too bad, it's still a single core gpu. Gaming wise still the iPhone 4s way better.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:37
  • u7m9

no 12 megapixel camera
no ceramic body
no RGB screen
no better processer

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:34
  • dT2U

Nothing special, no ceramic body, no water resistant, extremely large phone, Do you need that size?, please, any good reason for that. Simply don't like it, I will go fo an iPhone 4S.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:33
  • P1j{

> In reply to Quality @ 2012-05-03 23:49 from QuDB - click to readPlease.. You don't know what you're talking about, take a look at this:

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:33
  • m{h6

> In reply to Mark @ 2012-05-03 23:55 from muL{ - click to readThe s2 killed the Iphone one year ago

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:21
  • nbuE

Supercurio confirmed Wolfson DAC in this one, I"m sold.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:15
  • i2Gt

> In reply to Quality @ 2012-05-03 23:49 from QuDB - click to readYou have to think battery life too . And the possibility to buy a bigger one :) Htc and Apple don't give you that choice .

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:14
  • 3RLc

I just ran a Qudrant scan on my Samsung Galaxy S II, with android 4,0. The benchmark said 4029

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:10
  • 0upb

are you guys blind.....look at the benchmarks .....haters will be haters.....SG3 all the why...

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:09
  • 4Cyt

practical, future proof
what else do you need

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:08
  • K1KK

All this is amazing, but this design?
It's uglyyy.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-04 00:02
  • JA$d

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.