News - Reader comments

Dual-core Snapdragon S4 confirmed for Verizon Galaxy S III

Dual-core Snapdragon S4 confirmed for Verizon Galaxy S III - read the full textLooks like people in the US willing to grab the upcoming Galaxy S III won't be treated to its quad-core Exynos variant. Instead, latest evidence points to a dual-core Snapdragon S4 powering the Galaxy S III for Verizon. This is further confirmed by early NenaMark2 benchmarks, which show a Galaxy...

 

Sort by:

Seems most nooby here doesn't know that S4 is a next generation A15 equivalent processor.

This is just like choosing between a quadcore A8 CPU vs dualcore A9 CPU.

------------------------------------------------­------------------------

I just want to say that even if android is running on quad. Unfortunately u dont have even single app to utilize it and also.

I really wonder that benchmarks really reveal anything. Real world results are different.
Last time i tried playing a game on Galaxy S and really lagged and then i tried same game on iPod touch 2009 Model which ran smooth.I am really done with all those benchmarks.

Android only good on paper but windows/iOS really good in real life even with low specs.
Sure u can say windows phone is bad but samsung and HTC also makes them because its a nice polished OS running on low spec hardware.

Unless google really implement stuff , dual or quad makes no difference and also no offence that Galaxy s3 or HTC one X comes with OEM bloatware unlike nexus series which has pure android experience and also perfectly integrated because google launches new OS everytime along with new phone.

Galaxy s2 showed lot of difference in benchmark after ICS uodate and people got that update recently and some of regions still doesnt have updates. Pathetic OEMs rushing to release phones instead of making them perfect and then releasing.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 05:41
  • ut30

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-05-15 04:04 from 4bve - click to readSo True. I'm on Tmo US and they've screwed the customers quite a bit with phones as of late. The Tmo S2 was actually the fastest version though.

I'm waiting for that Tmo Note. If anyone knows where I can get a AT&T Note Off Contract for cheap, let me know. Please and Thank You. :)

Knowing Tmo, they're probably going to try to charge $700 off contract for a almost year old device still and it'll most likely have no updates over the previous Note.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 05:02
  • jxxN

> In reply to Switch to Tmobile @ 2012-05-15 00:32 from RbqD - click to readyour right, ours probably wont even be a dual core, like they did with the s2.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 04:04
  • 4bve

this isn't a galaxy s3 is a galaxy s2.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 03:56
  • 4bve

They really should use the A15, so much faster and LTE supported.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 03:33
  • RxBg

thank god though i hate verizon... sad people had to pay high because there is no market for good service so they jack the price up. att and tmobile better do something.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 02:46
  • qCSm

> In reply to Tanaldaion @ 2012-05-15 02:11 from 7XbR - click to read"a lot of benchmark"? You mean Qualcomm's Vellamo and tweaked Linpack of S4 SoC? So where're Antutu, BrowserMark and GLBenchmark Offscreen?

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 02:35
  • 2IJJ

Trash.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 02:27
  • FLxd

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-05-14 23:29 from 4I84 - click to readWhat advantage? The quadcore Exynos SoC? It's already proven in a lot of benchmarks that the dualcore S4 Krait can keep up with the quad core Exynos.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 02:11
  • 7XbR

Fragmentation 101.

Why they still come out many phones when they can't even provide simple updates to older phones. Oh well.

Anywho it doesn't matter, basically the difference would be noticeable in battery consumption. Usage-wise unless you are a heavy-ass user you will feel the difference, other than that, nope. Even 1Ghz 1st-gen is fine to do many things, just not able to multi-task many things compared to now.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 02:11
  • IVZ1

Seems most nooby here doesn't know that S4 is a next generation A15 equivalent processor.

This is just like choosing between a quadcore A8 CPU vs dualcore A9 CPU.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 01:46
  • v0XM

I guess since this version has a Dual Core processor, it's not worthy anymore.

Thus the logic of Android fanboys. LOL

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 01:08
  • qJHD

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-05-14 23:29 from 4I84 - click to readNo dude its ASUS padphone not optimus...

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 00:38
  • N7T1

Lucky I am with tmobile and not with verizen

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 00:32
  • RbqD

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-05-14 22:14 from 4Axf - click to readAre you stupid? The Exynos is a 32nm chipset, you're getting confused with the Tegra 40nm chipset which is slower or equal to the S4. The Exynos beats them both, go read benchmarks.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-15 00:21
  • qN@1

This just takes away any advantage the Galaxy S III has over any other phone. Optimus LTE2 FTW!

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-14 23:29
  • 4I84

than its a s2 witha big screen lol

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-14 23:26
  • 8KsC

samsung you guys are pathetic, you introduce a quad core but limit it to dual core to put in the lte, cause the lte couldnt go in with it, all the millions we give u

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-14 23:16
  • jnTV

But the S4 is SO much faster and better than the Crackexynos, just too many ppl are falling into "OMG i have a quad-core phone" just for bragging rights, why not just say u have a ps3 cell processor inside lol

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-14 22:14
  • 4Axf

> In reply to vhinze @ 2012-05-14 22:08 from P@1G - click to readThe post before yours explains that is not a typo.The us version of HTC ONE X also has krait s4

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-14 22:13
  • puf3

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.