News - Reader comments

NTT Docomo announces dual-core Samsung Galaxy S III (SC-06D)

NTT Docomo announces dual-core Samsung Galaxy S III (SC-06D) - read the full textUnsurprisingly, the summer lineup of the Japanese carrier NTT Docomo includes the high-profile Samsung Galaxy S III. What caught our eye, however, is that the Japanese version makes use of a dual-core Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 1.5GHz processor (MSM8960) much like the LTE-equipped HTC One X for AT&T US...


Sort by:

no need more then 2GB ram..need more core like 6 core or 8 something like that lol...then it more fast aswel more slim aswel body need look nice and lastly batry 3k++ mah lol..sory for much asking but this my suggestion..

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-17 03:58
  • IVC%

I'd rather have RAM than cores for sure. Nice phone.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-17 03:41
  • cNYp

> In reply to Denzo @ 2012-05-16 23:01 from IPtD - click to readFunny. And kind of true. But still now that phones have power Android truly is the superior OS.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-17 03:41
  • cNYp

My initial phone was an iphone. Then, i tried several android phones including samsung's top of the line galaxy s series. Ultimately in the end i switched back to Iphone again. I am not advertising for iphone or something, but trying to explain the build quality of a galaxy s phone compared to phones like iphone. I would rather purchase a phone from motorola atleast they have a better build quality not a cheap feeling plastic toy like galaxy. I agree samsung earned a lot from these galaxy phones but come future we will notice a dropdown of sales.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-17 03:39
  • YefU

dual core is enough for a fon..2 gig ram is so you can call it smart fon..

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-17 01:58
  • Px06

To run smooth as the iPhone, it'll need around 200GB... lol

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-17 01:10
  • pXJ0

It needs 4GB ro run smooth on Android..

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-16 23:01
  • IPtD

OMG 2GB of Ram dis da iphone killa! LOL.

Looks good though cant wait to get my EU version bring on May 30th

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-16 22:17
  • myAy

> In reply to sss @ 2012-05-16 21:25 from LaLi - click to readread again. 1st line in the 2nd paragraph, or judging by your standards of reading an article, the 5th line.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-16 22:15
  • 5KPP

> In reply to sss @ 2012-05-16 21:25 from LaLi - click to readI think they just added. Just now I couldn't find but when I refresh the page, there is!!

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-16 21:53
  • IVKP

Where in this article have you mentioned anything about the 2gb of ram? Absolutely nowhere. But it's in the title.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-16 21:25
  • LaLi

it is 0.4 mm thicker than the original one.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-16 21:24
  • mEBe

> In reply to [deleted post]fail

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-16 21:23
  • tAxA

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.