News - Reader comments

Early benchmarks show that  Mobile Safari got faster with iOS 6

12 June, 2012 | Read the news | Post your comment
Early benchmarks show that  Mobile Safari got faster with iOS 6 - read the full textIt's customary for a new mobile OS version to bring an improved web browser and that's one of the first things to get tested. iOS 6 was only announced yesterday ,but the default browser of its beta version was already subjected to a few tests. AnandTech ran some benchmarks on an iPhone 4S and...

 

Sort by:

  • Jackskellington6sic6
  • Report
  • Rating0

> In reply to roshan @ 2012-06-13 13:17 from P$uD - click to readYeah. Now try actually using a smart phone because commenting on a site about them

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-15 07:51
  • Y6vX
  • Jackskellington6sic6
  • Report
  • Rating0

> In reply to Manyuken @ 2012-06-13 17:08 from L7EG - click to readThat's an excuse because you don't have it. In the meantime while many things are still flash and it's very usuable. All Droids will have HTML5 when they need it

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-15 07:51
  • Y6vX

> In reply to Professor Farnsworth @ 2012-06-12 21:26 from qbnL - click to readprof farns sounds more like a bender. if u know what i mean...pun intended.

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-14 13:15
  • 3AxW

> In reply to faisolbau @ 2012-06-13 04:28 from y$hY - click to readFlash is dead, long live HTML5.

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-13 17:08
  • L7EG

no one can beat apple..iphone rocks...s3 n samsung jst 2 words for u suck it :P

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-13 13:17
  • P$uD

> In reply to Sir Awesome @ 2012-06-12 14:03 from sy1s - click to readhmm, i don't really hate Apple itself but what i do hate in Apple are their darn restrictions and high prices. your point is perfect mate.

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-13 12:07
  • YTZn

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-06-13 02:10 from jyA5 - click to readiOS has weather in the notification bar and you can ask siri for weather too. Have you never touch an iPhone?

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-13 06:43
  • kg3x

does it support flash ?

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-13 04:28
  • y$hY

> In reply to jackskellington6sic6 @ 2012-06-13 00:20 from 4QSP - click to readWhy are you arguing about Bluetooth when iOS has a ton of other problems to take care of? As in a better interface or widgets. Like weather. We don't want an app for that.

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-13 02:10
  • jyA5

> In reply to Sir Awesome @ 2012-06-12 23:31 from sybJ - click to readActually its no coincidence that being Korean and espousing the same values, Samsung is the Kia, Daewoo, or even Samsung of phones lol.

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-13 00:44
  • IWYP
  • Professor Farnsworth
  • Report
  • Rating0

> In reply to Sir Awesome @ 2012-06-12 23:31 from sybJ - click to readIndeed; Samsung has some fine processors, and their past browser optimizations have been impressive - should be interesting to see how(/if?) the next iPhone stacks up.

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-13 00:33
  • qbnL
  • jackskellington6sic6
  • Report
  • Rating0

> In reply to Sir Awesome @ 2012-06-12 23:31 from sybJ - click to readIt will be 5S, 6, or something else. The window for 5 went with 4S

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-13 00:22
  • 4QSP
  • jackskellington6sic6
  • Report
  • Rating0

> In reply to Professor Farnsworth @ 2012-06-12 22:30 from qbnL - click to readWow....obviously that person was incorrect. All iPhones have Bluetooth, but inaccuracy in response to inaccuracy. It was a simple statement nothing more. I also love how I haven't said anything bad about you, but multiple times I've been labled....nice......we are both of topic so its irrelevant of you to peg that on me. You corrected something off topic as did I. Like I said Bluetooth was not made to restrict. There is no excuse for it that period. I never implied anything else towards you or apple except the Bluetooth matter. Lets here the next rant now

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-13 00:20
  • 4QSP

Do you all realise that Safari and IE are the easiest and quickest to hack? Nobody bothers though.

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-13 00:02
  • fqnU

> In reply to harlekkin @ 2012-06-12 14:41 from 2G2L - click to readNaws, Samsung is the McLaren, Koenigsegg or Bugatti of phones.

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-12 23:31
  • sybJ

> In reply to Professor Farnsworth @ 2012-06-12 16:57 from qbnL - click to readWell we can wait until iPhone 5 comes out. :)

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-12 23:31
  • sybJ
  • Professor Farnsworth
  • Report
  • Rating0

> In reply to jackskellington6sic6 @ 2012-06-12 21:32 from q8Q8 - click to readOh my no. I think you'll actually find I mocked a ridiculous response, pointed out its inaccuracy, and noted it as OT. When you chose to respond seriously (as fanboys are noted to do), having yourself made erroneous assumptions, I marked the the error in your rebuttal and again indicated it as off topic. Perplexingly, this has yet again incurred an incorrect and off-topic reply. Apples seem do all they claim on the box, thus they've squeezed in precisely as many Bluetooths as necessary. If the box listed more profiles, that would require more Bluetooths, and if it again worked as advertised they would still have included precisely as many Bluetooths as necessary. The mere concept of /too many/ Bluetooths is preposterous! And still, this has nothing to do with the article, or comments, or replies to comments... To shreds I say!

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-12 22:30
  • qbnL
  • jackskellington6sic6
  • Report
  • Rating0

> In reply to Professor Farnsworth @ 2012-06-12 21:26 from qbnL - click to readPS I wasn't making this a fanboy war. Just simply corrected an incorrect statement. And now I'm the insecure fanboy. Hmmmm

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-12 21:34
  • q8Q8
  • jackskellington6sic6
  • Report
  • Rating0

> In reply to Karlo @ 2012-06-12 20:36 from 3qZF - click to readAgreed

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-12 21:32
  • q8Q8
  • jackskellington6sic6
  • Report
  • Rating0

> In reply to Professor Farnsworth @ 2012-06-12 21:26 from qbnL - click to readComing from the person also responding off topic. So if it had full Bluetooth access all along would you say they have too much? I don't think so. Yet because apple limits something that had been around for long before and was open for anything that supports it that's all it needs..because that's all your given. I see.

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-12 21:32
  • q8Q8

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.