News - Reader comments

Samsung gets expedited Galaxy Nexus injunction hearing

14 July, 2012 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung gets expedited Galaxy Nexus injunction hearing - read the full textThe US Court of Appeals has granted Samsung's request to expedite its appeal of the preliminary injunction against the Galaxy Nexus. The company must file its court brief to start the process before July 16 and Apple has until July 30 to respond. The final comments on the case are due on...

 

Sort by:

If Samsung cuts off my nexus device price because of apple then I will cut that apple into.two pieces and never buy that iPhone whatever it is ..I have already used my earning for buying galaxy nexus i95250

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-25 15:08
  • 7w4F

> In reply to Chewy @ 2012-07-16 09:43 from MVg6 - click to readYou were right on the ball all the way through. Right on the dot.....then you blamed it on Jobs dying.............jobs is behind most of that crap. Its been like this from the start with apple. and now that he is gone they continue his dirty work

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-21 12:45
  • q8Q8

apple is just seizing the innovation.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-18 05:40
  • PDPg

don't compare samsung in apple becouse samsung is much better! Chip price, buy now u owned 100%,many models that u can choose and fit for u(unlike apple less & one model per y), open in 3rd party, no protest! Compare gs3 vs ip4s gs3 u can use btft, msdc exapansions battery replasable, no routing (apple jailbraiking) independent (unlike ip4s dependent in itunes) etc! So where u go for?

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-17 12:19
  • t7Xh

apple is a pain in the ass...they do not own the smartphone concept.one thing they truly believe in is if u cant beat them sue them lol.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-16 23:12
  • NrVp

Apple should start appreciating competition and that they don't own the world. Samsung should stop supplying apple with their products if apple keeps fighting them.apple should just die

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-16 19:32
  • 0wqU

> In reply to WaNgSa86 @ 2012-07-16 12:19 from Pvmi - click to readYes very true. I guess American companies like to "sue" every country except themselves. Without the helping hand of Samsung in terms of supplying chips to Apple, Apple wouldn't be able to do anything. Apple needs to think of new ideas, stop suing other companies and to save their money instead of paying huge lawyer fees.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-16 13:33
  • i5BK

Apple is to greedy, I would never buy an apple product just for this matter. On the other hand samsung must nit even worry if they can't sell in US they sill sell big time in other continents.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-16 12:19
  • Pvmi

> In reply to Righty @ 2012-07-15 23:32 from JaEa - click to readMate that was an embarrassing post.....Apple don't make there own hardware.
Samsung makes some of the best hardware components in the world, thats why apple has gone with them.

Samsungs exeynos CPU is arguably the best in the world.....your making it as if Apple made the CPU and Samsung is using it. Apple is using Samsung tech not the other way around.

As for your baseless comment about Android phones having to be restarted, so iphone never freezes or crashes or never has to be restarted....well that would be a lie, I had an iphone converted to android for the freedom....guess what the iphone does crash and does need to be restarted....not to mention the iphone crashes more than android....enjoy the proof
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Mobil...port-358312/

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-16 11:11
  • tAR2

if Samsung and Apple break their contractual obligations apple should go for nvidia or qualcomm and the result will be very interesting!
iphone 5 or maybe the new iphone(nvidia tegra3 or qualcomm s4)vs galaxy note 2(exynos 5250)!!!

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-16 10:28
  • 0U$%

> In reply to Chewy @ 2012-07-16 09:33 from MVg6 - click to readapple do more than just phones and tablets

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-16 10:26
  • 3AxW

> In reply to rayjan29 @ 2012-07-16 04:30 from t7Jf - click to readSamsung had a thriving phone business long before the iPhone was even mentioned. I had two such devices. They were durable, well designed and had custom alarm tones. Oh wait, Apple's going to introduce this revolutionary feature in iOS6.
And Samsung is doing well in every other market it's got a presence in, be it computers, home appliances or televisions. They're also a very sizable fabrication company. Don't think they can't survive without Android. Even without Android, they have Tizen or Bada.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-16 10:25
  • ijZk

> In reply to Righty @ 2012-07-15 23:32 from JaEa - click to readi have galaxy s2 and my s2 does not need random restarts!go and transfer music and videos with itunes!

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-16 10:10
  • 0U$%

If only Apple followers (because yeah, it's as bad as a cult) would wake up and realise what's going on.

You can see it in the comments, "Apple the greatest", "Samsung sucks balls and would lose millions if Apple pulled out"..

It's laughable.

The fact of the matter is, if Samsung and Apple could break their contractual obligations, Apple would lose the most. Samsung wouldn't even realise that Apple had stopped paying them. Yes, smartphones are a massive market, but Apple only make mp3 players and computers. Samsung are one of the biggest electronic companies in the world. If you think that Apple could turn around and just find another comapany who would supply the same amount of parts, of the same quality, on time... you're kidding yourself.

But then in the same thought, if Apple stopped concentrating on trying to drag others down, and started looking at innovation again, they wouldn't have to worry about Samsung.

It's all gone to pot since Steve Jobs died. He was the true innovator in Apple.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-16 09:43
  • MVg6

> In reply to tnkrulz @ 2012-07-15 22:25 from ITJT - click to readDon't be daft... Samsung was a massive company before they started business with Apple. There is more to lose for Apple.. Samsung don't just do phones you know ;)

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-16 09:33
  • MVg6

> In reply to tnkrulz @ 2012-07-15 22:25 from ITJT - click to readWhat planet are you on? While you are partly correct, if Apple lose their contracts with Samsung, they're going to be in serious trouble - they will need to find a new provider, since Apple purchases rather than innovates, and while some companies will be up for it, I would imagine some of the major players will stay well clear of Apple due to Apple's behaviour. Getting involved with Apple is very expensive in court fees...

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-16 09:05
  • iIR0

> In reply to tnkrulz @ 2012-07-15 22:25 from ITJT - click to readYou just keep dreaming

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-16 08:48
  • tpPr

It's ok guys, no problem for Samsung, actually it is a good thing for Samsung and it is an opportunity to see Apples eaten part :-)

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-16 08:12
  • 0IFR

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-07-16 06:54 from P@T8 - click to readAmen to that.

Who copied who?

If Apple patented something that was originally not theirs but they were the ones who PATENT it first, they can even sue the ones who developed it.

If they patent the drop-down menu then all hell would break loose.

How unethical and unhealthy competitors Apple really is... Rotten fruit indeed.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-16 07:14
  • PxAK

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-07-16 06:46 from P@T8 - click to readWho cares if they design it, if they can't make it, they're terrible.
Getting someone else to do it for you because you're too crappy to do it yourself.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-16 07:14
  • sydW

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.