News - Reader comments

Apple's court filings reveal early iPhone designs

27 July, 2012 | Read the news | Post your comment
Apple's court filings reveal early iPhone designs - read the full textThe legal battle between Apple and Samsung may have become tiring to some but you can't deny the juiciness of some of the secrets that have been uncovered through internal documents since the two started going at each other. Case in point being the latest Apple's internal documents that have...


Sort by:

wow!!! you iphone haters really have no logical thoughts nor above par opinions about apple, i'm an android fan but its disgusts me that i share the same space with u. ihaters are like cavemen...see apple, hate apple, hate apple users...pathetic.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 12:31
  • Ge@H

> In reply to Dang @ 2012-07-27 12:17 from P@1G - click to readCan you type properly, please? While your posts are good, they are annoying to read.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 12:25
  • iIR0

Look at GSMArena, defending Apple (their favourites) with a whole paragpraph in bold text making clear that Apple never went ahead with their Sony rip-offs. pure hypocrisy that Apple now sue Samsung for doing what Apple nearly did.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 12:24
  • iIR0

As to the degree of participati0n this is how the story is:
Principal: Apple why? because they were the first in c0ntact with the design
Accomplice: Samsung why? because they act as precursor of Apple's design
Accessory: Google why? because y they remained in silence yet they warned samsung already.
Victim: SONY why? Its already CLEAR n0 nid to xplain. AM I RIGHT? So to c0nclude Google, Apple and Samsung all this 3 giants were accused 0n this crime.,.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 12:17
  • P@1G

Why gsmarena seems very late with this issue, ph0nearena has had near 200 c0mments already. Anyway, so that's the real st0ry way back 2006 when first iph0ne was unveiled year 2007..,., neither 0f the two made the idea for that c0ncept design but rather inspired by an0ther tech giant SONY..,, Perhaps b0th 0f them must be sued and f0und guilty for stealing Sony's idea.,.....,.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 11:28
  • P@1G

How is that a weak argument?
Thats design.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 11:08
  • nUaS

he was not a fan!

sony show designs to steve jobs and he asked his designer to copy them!!!

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 10:52
  • Pv9c

Proves that apple has copied a lof of designs .... and now for them to act all sacrosant ... makes one ask everyone to not buy anything from apple

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 10:40
  • vGqJ

Like toy in the hell hand

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 10:29
  • Mf5j

i wonder why earth z a bended spherical shape n finally i got a reason which had some sense...
actually earth was of the shape of an apple but then apple sue it thus it had reformed its shape to a sphere...
next survey- why the girl's chests r spherical??

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 10:22
  • U{7C

> In reply to Whatchasay @ 2012-07-27 08:56 from 4$ve - click to readyour so right google see this but samsung and samsung fans dont if they wasnt coping apple google wouldnt of said this to samsung open your eyes ppl, just a example siri came out then samsung brought svoice just saying

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 10:17
  • 39x{
  • The worst approach!
  • Report
  • Rating1

This is probably the worst approach Samsung could ever do to this case.

They have plenty of merits to make their case and, up until now, I never thought anyone could actually deliver an argument which could make Samsung loose the case. Boy was I wrong... Samsung just did that!

They aren't actively denying any "inspiration" from an already existing Apple product, they are trying to counter that by saying the Apple product was designed imagining how another company (who had never done that product before) would design it.

That is an huge fail!
Only things that actually exits can be patented/copyrighted. Imagining how something that does not exist would look like is not illegal by any boundary!
On the other hand, making something based on an already existing product is!

Foolish defense and kill blow to Samsung!
Worst part of it is that the case wouldn't have any merits if they hadn't attempted the way of "so what, they have copied first" -- which by their argument they actually didn't.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 10:12
  • mF8Z

i want Jony phone

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 10:10
  • v0Xt

Jony? Ridiculous. hahaha

actually the jony prototype looks like an iphone 4/4s. only thing is, it's like a fake chinese phone

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 10:04
  • thcd

> In reply to israel @ 2012-07-27 09:31 from t7Xh - click to readoh! I see u again and again plastic copy user!

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 09:50
  • t7Xh

Our world is in utter chaos (wars, hunger, crimes, poverty, injustice). Meanwhile Apple and Samsung continue to fight. Good job.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 09:50
  • t7RD

> In reply to israel @ 2012-07-27 09:31 from t7Xh - click to readoh! I see u again and again plastic boy!

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 09:50
  • t7Xh

Whoever copy who design first, because of arrogant acts of Apple, who's last CEO also "re-invent" the new "Hater world", I'll never buying into any American products anymore.

Don't get me wrong, to me most of American are good people. Only the last Apple CEO Steve Jobs and his Co. are bad.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 09:49
  • PV{w

> In reply to Wilson @ 2012-07-27 08:51 from M$Fq - click to readHa ha. Love the Moses tablets line.
Seriously though, all but the most moronic of fanboys has come to realise that it's all this litigation is about stifling competition rather than protecting intellectual property.
Apparently Microsoft used to have a habit of bringing lawsuits for fun and Google have done it with regards to the search engine industry. Everyone is at it so could you just get back to making great phones for us please, then all the fanboys can sod off back to World Of Warcraft where they belong.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 09:48
  • LhTv

There is nothing truely original in this world anymore. Not sure why Apple and Sumsang are pretending there is!!!

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 09:33
  • DGCb

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.