News - Reader comments

Samsung Galaxy Note II LTE live pictures and benchmarks

31 August, 2012 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung Galaxy Note II LTE live pictures and benchmarks - read the full textThe Galaxy Note II LTE is here and it looks identical to its LTE-less global counterpart. We asked around and turns out that the Note II LTE has the same innards as well - a quad-core Exynos 4412 Quad SoC with an additional LTE chip inside. Samsung Galaxy Note II LTE hands-on The Note...

 

Sort by:

awesome device. it cant get any better.
nice job samsung. the hell with apple. they think they own rectangle devices with touch screen?

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 08:45
  • sfQM

> In reply to Joseph98 @ 2012-08-31 21:14 from HxY7 - click to readaLsO tHe rEsOLuTioN iS 1280*720 nOt 1280*800

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 08:18
  • 0BR8

> In reply to Chamamen @ 2012-09-01 03:16 from 3SPK - click to readSolved the case?? How does that even refer to anything?? Again Sony's phones have always left me disappointed and if the xperia s is one of those improved ones your talking about they still got some way to go... the designs and build are probably the biggest thing they got going for them..
I'm only speaking from experience and as I said I hope I'm proved wrong but everyone's saying the s3 killer which is a massive compliment to the phone but kinda odd by the way because it seems to get so much negative attention. . go figure?? @
Anyway since the whole smartphone revolution Sony and lg have not bought out a phone even close to being top of the heap and with such attention... never heard anyone saying this new phone is gunna be the new Sony xperia /lg whatever killer!..

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 06:39
  • vMew

Another failure in the result test.. good job sammy... lol.. more failure to arrive soon perhaps??.. looking foward to see sammy tablet window 8 vs vaio 11.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 05:28
  • tZk9

OMG, I'm already at work now and really surprised to see how many people are talking about Note 2. Yea, Note 2 is more than a new flagship. Probably it's the new savior rather than an outstanding innovation.

Go Samsung, others will be watching your success jealously.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 05:17
  • 6%2I

> In reply to unbelievable @ 2012-08-31 20:13 from MfxM - click to readLol experia play, id rather buy galaxy s2 again..

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 05:02
  • v0Xt

Why isn't this model got 12Mega Pix Camera, why? why an outdated feature in this new Phone??? Another example of drip feed marketing whereby a manufacturer such as Samsung in this case comes out with a new phone and lacking some new update feature in line with its other competitors, its always wait for the new model in 3-6 months time and more revenue sales for the manufacturer. When is some competitor going to put these drip feed marketers in there place and come out with the SUPER DUPER Phone as of now! and NOT in 3-6 months time? Real con stuff

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 04:33
  • PME@

one x results is older...

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 04:09
  • 0Itq

> In reply to kirkz @ 2012-09-01 00:15 from v0qZ - click to readHe must be Apple fanboys....

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 03:58
  • IWHE

> In reply to [deleted post]O yeah!! Still getting smoked by Sony... Go compare the figures before you say something stupid. Samsung fanboy! Hahaha...

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 03:40
  • t7Xr

> In reply to [deleted post]first compare from the link u have xperias r better though

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 03:37
  • rJJ@

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-08-31 20:08 from vMew - click to readYeah yeah yeah you solved the case sherlock! But let me tell, all the galaxies I had got bad performance and laggy OS but they did better with SII and now with SIII. SONY may had their problems with their UI in the past but they aren't so messy like you "Anonymous" say, they did better know! They are stronger and smarter! It's a good thing because they better quality ;) and improves market quality as designs models or build quality!

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 03:16
  • 3SPK

> In reply to keamron @ 2012-08-31 22:07 from 7qxe - click to readSuch an amateur comment.

  • Reply
  • 2012-09-01 00:15
  • v0qZ

> In reply to curious @ 2012-08-31 22:24 from iJtU - click to readExactly,I wouldn't mind little less score if the battery is good.1750mAh/1850mAh batteries are just not enough for 2012 phones,same goes for screen type and size.

  • Reply
  • 2012-08-31 22:29
  • fkVx

faster performance -> much faster battery drain.

Also, from the pictures it looks like the corners are more rounded than on the original. Too bad because
less rounding -> larger display and/or smaller overall dimensions.

  • Reply
  • 2012-08-31 22:24
  • iJtU

> In reply to GT @ 2012-08-31 21:15 from q}Zg - click to readIts samsung thats why , They always fake it , Shows Mountain , But in real its just a Rock

  • Reply
  • 2012-08-31 22:07
  • 7qxe

What are sony fans doing here ? This article is not about sony,go advertise for your loved company somewhere else.

PS:have fun with the tiny little bit more benchmark score at the cost of half the battery life of s3/note 2 and old/small TFT screens(even that they are HD,still suck).

  • Reply
  • 2012-08-31 22:00
  • fkVx

look at the phone stabality... got a turbo engine but always crash... 2gb ram will hold everything

  • Reply
  • 2012-08-31 21:58
  • PS6j

"SONY" FOR PARTY ROCKING
SONY's new mobile phones have the first
SONY know what to do. Why spend money for quad cores since it can o dual cores better than quad cores.

  • Reply
  • 2012-08-31 21:32
  • i80u

Why does the last picture show screen resolution at 1280x800? Thought it was 720...

  • Reply
  • 2012-08-31 21:15
  • q}Zg
Sort by:

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.