Anonymous, 23 Sep 2012if a person is a fan of something, they will be ignorant to everything that is against that pr... moreYes thats the fact! That ur sgs3 is beaten by iphone 5 lots of article circulating this time. Hahahaha
Lolhaha, 23 Sep 2012If a person realy hates something. He would never ever stop to seek a reason to hate. :)))if a person is a fan of something, they will be ignorant to everything that is against that product. even if they are facts
Anonymous, 23 Sep 2012Ur loyalty is endearing will give ya that lol!!!! No ur fanboyism is at its best. AMAZING!! Lolhahahahha
Anonymous, 23 Sep 2012BTW kinda weird that pcmag has only released results of only a couple benchmark tests.. No si... moreIf a person realy hates something. He would never ever stop to seek a reason to hate. :)))
Lolhaha, 23 Sep 2012Wow u believe an article that is 4months old. Lol! Poor samcheap fandroids outthere. Trying to... more4 months old or not it still beats it when running Jelly Bean. Enjoy your iPhone 5 being 100 faster than ice cream sandwich for the time being until November when Jelly bean is released to make use of the 4 cores.
BTW kinda weird that pcmag has only released results of only a couple benchmark tests..
No sign of Geekbench,nena, quadrant etc etc
Wonder why lol; )
Anonymous, 23 Sep 2012Gaming on a bigger screen with lower PPI that what I called Pathetic to the core. ROFL...
your naked eye can't even count the individual pixels.
but gaming on 4" non HD vs 4.8" HD,
4.8" HD wins.....
[deleted post]4.8' is a win? If u want a true real gaming go and play with a 46'+ screen. Thats a real win! Lolhaha
This is crab pullshit check out the results for Galaxy SIII , HTC one X and LG 4X in www.gsmarena.com/quad_core_shootout-review-790.php and you will find that they changes the number for the same test so who can believe this CRAP not i'm not like Appla no i adore apple but please be objective and reliable.
dhcp, 23 Sep 2012Can't accept the truth ? http://browser.primatelabs.com/android-benchmarks 1755, that sh... moreWow u believe an article that is 4months old. Lol! Poor samcheap fandroids outthere. Trying to searc the whole world wide web just to seek an old article to prove their sgs3 is better. Dont cry kids its just a benchmark lol hahahahha
Anonymous, 23 Sep 2012 gaming on a tiny screen? pathetic Gaming on a bigger screen with lower PPI that what I called Pathetic to the core. ROFL...
Lolhaha, 23 Sep 2012And its funny how u cant accept the truth? I got that article and pcmag is credible. Atleast i... moreCan't accept the truth ?
1755, that shuts your mouth. The one that scored below the iPhone 5 was a dual core version lol.
Anonymous, 23 Sep 2012 it's still paid, it's not proof... I'd rather believe a paid review rather than a fanboy that cant accept it. Lolhaha
Well to tell you the truth I went to BJs on 9/21/2012 and had a look at the new iPhone 5 and I was not impress at all it's like the 4s only difference is a larger screen and LTE 4G, but I think the Motorola drid is a better phone to me and that's an android and it only cost $99 with a two year contract.
Anonymous, 23 Sep 2012 it's a paid review. sugar coating by crApple so ifans can't focus on the negative sides, map... moreAtleast there's a paid(rumor) review. Not somebody tell that no this is biased my ss3 scored 1900 and the world will be destroyed this coming dec21 2012. Lol everyone can say anything without proof. This is proof no matter if its paid or not it still proof. Not here say here that. Lol
Lolhaha, 23 Sep 2012Are tou the one that says that he dont trust this test? He only trust pcmag?
it's a paid review. sugar coating by crApple so ifans can't focus on the negative sides, maps issues, chipping and scratches on the aluminum, not HD, limited connectivity, etc...