News - Reader comments

Sony Ericsson G502 and Z780 unveiled

Sony Ericsson G502 and Z780 unveiled - read the full textIt is finally over. After quite a number of photos leaked all around the place for the past few days, Sony Ericsson G502 and Sony Ericsson Z780 were officially announced today. According to the press release they are meant to be web-oriented handsets and the specs are there just to back that...

 

Sort by:

Stop being ignorant, and complain about the obvious...
The reason why the features are downgraded from the G700/900, its because this is G502! The stats are obviously going to be lower grade in comparison. DUH

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-27 01:41
  • jDvD

What is going on in their minds? I mean, I would really like to buy a beautiful Sony Ericsson clamshell phone. But isn't there a possibility to include the camera in a more sophisticated way? Even a more sophisticated camera? Well...

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-24 15:06
  • ngWv

why? becoz se is "inferior"

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-24 11:14
  • 25Fk

Oh come on!

QVGA has been around for over 3 years now - I'm waiting for VGA screens at least!

To be different I bought a SHARP 905i from DoCoMo, and even though you can't use many of its features, the screen and multimedia functions (Dolby Audio) simply blow my mind!

I want SE to come up with a similar product!

Don't care if its slightly longer than most flip phones!!!

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-24 07:27
  • PEKR

why in the world do they keep making phones that have screens smaller than satan's love for priests. do they want to piss off all their potential buyers?

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-24 06:34
  • kbmY

There are so many whitewash handsets being produced these days. They're all just 'meh'.

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-24 06:11
  • vmxp

These phones have nice designs. The features are not bad also.

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-23 16:37
  • ib4x

I thought the G series is the mid tiered UIQ phones. But obviously wrong. Specs to specs, G700/900 wins hands down. HSPA might be nice but 2" screen for web browsing? The Z780 looks more promising. 2.2" screen, HSDPA, GPS and probably within the same price range as the Z770. Overal? Not very good. Bad SE in action again.

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-23 16:01
  • 2AwT

Very nice phones but why does one thing have to allways spoil it? Im this case the non autofocus cameras. This trend is very irritating.

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-23 15:35
  • M@Ti

this year SE fans have seen what they hav'nt seen in history of the company.The aggressiveness at which SE phones are being announced is a welcome idea. It shows that they are prepared to take market by storm.Design + feature is their trade mark, so..., is not a suprise anyway!.Hope to seeing such beauty from the UIQ devices.Thanks SE.

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-23 14:45
  • R1VV

i do not like these phones, but they are very stylish, i do not like them because they dont have wi fi, i will buy the g900

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-23 14:05
  • Pbtn

real specs HERE : http://forum2.mobile-review.co....php?t=75004

GREAT design of the Z780 ...Go SE!

I really LOVED IT!...look at this slim sleek GPS thingy ...NICE :)

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-23 13:57
  • fvAw

see? the recently announced XM phones are still better than these new phones from SE.. Sorry.. but Nokia has great specs to offer in a very affordable price w/c you cannot see from other company.

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-23 12:54
  • UD}w

... and of course the main one is:

Main screen: 262,144 colour TFT
Resolution: 320 x 240 pixels
Size: 2.2 inches

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-23 12:29
  • 0BiV

wrong Karabulev!

http://www.sonyericsson.com/cw...ses-20080423

External screen: Monochrome Resolution: 36 x 128 pixels

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-23 12:27
  • 0BiV

product page of z780 says it has screen with resolution 128 x 160 pixels

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-23 12:22
  • mW4I

it hasn't even begun yet!

where's the P5???

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-23 12:15
  • w0QM

thanks for that utterly useless comment giorgi.. Nice to see you're open minded

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-23 12:13
  • Mx@E

io change the date at the end of the new it's q2 2008 not q2 20008

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-23 12:03
  • 0UHx

they invest theyr money in the new and ugly concept! "fleurs du mal"

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-23 11:57
  • MS{C

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.