News - Reader comments

Galaxy S III mini specs and photo leak - dual-core CPU and JB

10 October, 2012 | Read the news | Post your comment
Galaxy S III mini specs and photo leak - dual-core CPU and JB - read the full textWell that was fast - the Samsung I8190 Galaxy S III mini leaked in full before tomorrow's official announcement. These specs are not official so they might be inaccurate, but they look right for a 4" Samsung Galaxy S III mini device. The screen is 4" big (which we already knew) and it's a Super...


Sort by:

> In reply to BlameItOnThem @ 2012-10-11 13:20 from sRjx - click to readAnd OS wise? Did you come here to tell us to buy a restricted OS that doesnt let you do as you like with your own phone? iOS and WP, i really dont see the difference, restricted to the bone, totally unsuitable for most ppls usage.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 13:49
  • vaNH

Spec wise, this is no match for L820! hoard of cores but still laggy and shitty built. Lumia any day!

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 13:20
  • sRjx

> In reply to Jun @ 2012-10-11 11:42 from IaHY - click to readthe same can be said of apple fanboys too. every manufacturer has fanboys and crtics, but the specs dont lie, and the sIII has pretty damn fantastic specs...

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 12:42
  • 3AxW

Fanboys say that S3 is better than iPhone 5 as it has bigger screen than iPhone 5.

When S3 mini coming out, now they start praising 4-inch screen size. hahaha

whatever there is a Galaxy logo, fanboys will praise it

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 11:42
  • IaHY

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-10-11 10:47 from Qxpm - click to readI prefer samsung galaxy s2 size with note 2 will be a killer...smash iphone in no time...

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 11:37
  • Y}PK

> In reply to Krishna @ 2012-10-11 09:47 from b9}j - click to readKrishna, don't be surprised the specs publish here are accurate, in fact u can check out other website to confirm,

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 10:47
  • Qxpm

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-10-11 04:45 from kVNb - click to readI would argue that it would sell MORE as it is "only" 4".

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 10:34
  • dQqm

Guys don't get frustrated it's not for you... Look at the picture!!! It cute portable and decent powered... THIS IS A GIRLS PHONE!!!!!!!!!!! And it will sell like a charm!!! They will love and will pay extra for the nice looks .......

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 10:23
  • pmRJ

at the same price the s2 is a better buy if you can ignore jb

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 10:06
  • U@Hc

I would be extremely surprised if these specs are accurate.
The leaked specs sound almost identical to those of the Samsung Galaxy S Advance (I9070), which was released early this year. It would be illogical for Samsung to make an announcement for a phone that brings absolutely nothing new to the table.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 09:47
  • b9}j

This is such failed marketing 101. This phone would only serve to destroy the Galaxy S 3 name and confuse the mainstream. I wouldn't be surprised if people buys the mini thinking they have bought the actual S3 for cheap. Samsung is now gonna take the massive goodwill S3 generated and flush it down the toilet. Why give a mid ranged phone a top range phone name?

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 09:37
  • Y}QB

leaked specs may b wrong..
I hope it has a dual core krait....nd an eight mp camera......

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 09:30
  • s8a1


  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 09:25
  • nx2B

> In reply to djst @ 2012-10-11 06:12 from 0x}w - click to readSo its another indication that these specs are indeed wrong. I expect exynos quad or S4 dual and 8mp cam. But i dont have much hopes for the display, i bet they insist on using their beloved AMOLED once again, even with Pentile Samsung need size of 4.3 inch to make qHD resolution, and a qHD Pentile isnt clearer in small text than FWVGA anyway.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 08:30
  • vaNH

Yes, now I know that mu Galaxy S Advance is the same as the Galaxy S III mini :))))

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 07:39
  • nUV8

4" inch screen would be perfect for me. But WVGA resolution? It should be qHD. :)

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 07:19
  • UD}D

oo very nice trick !!!

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 07:16
  • Mfx9

It shouldn't be named Galaxy S III Mini because it's an Ace line phone, look at the code name I8190, not I9***. Samsung is fooling people.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 06:12
  • 0x}w

> In reply to ALonZo @ 2012-10-11 00:33 from gAac - click to readwhy would people waste USD515 for the same phone name S-Advance that cost USD350 ?
4" Screen, 1 Ghz duo core, 1500mha batery, 5MP camera which is exactly S-Advance.
I can get my self a S2 with 4.3" screen, 1.2ghz duo core, 8MP camera, 1650mha battery at USD 450, why would i buy this ??

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 05:57
  • IV8U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-10-10 18:26 from fxHY - click to readwell then u r pathetic

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 05:50
  • PS6Y

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.