News - Reader comments

Galaxy S III mini specs and photo leak - dual-core CPU and JB

10 October, 2012 | Read the news | Post your comment
Galaxy S III mini specs and photo leak - dual-core CPU and JB - read the full textWell that was fast - the Samsung I8190 Galaxy S III mini leaked in full before tomorrow's official announcement. These specs are not official so they might be inaccurate, but they look right for a 4" Samsung Galaxy S III mini device. The screen is 4" big (which we already knew) and it's a Super...

 

Sort by:

pricing will be the game changer here.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 19:41
  • Q{R5

Galaxy S2 is better compared to the price

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 19:40
  • KhtR

Bigger battery please, I can't understand when android is hated so much for its pathetic battery backup why can't manufacturers put bigger battery in their mobile phones

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 19:34
  • t}Ri

I was hoping for a 4,3" S3 with the other hardware staying the same, but this... thing is definitely not a S-class smartphone.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 19:22
  • p19G

S3 mini - Major Imposter Not Interested! S mini not s3mini! Samsung just throw out rubbish phones one after another excluding s2 and proper s3!! If you have a liking for wasting money on cheap plastic samsung is the way to go! If you like quality for a decent price go for sony or htc! Lg good but not for updates! Sammy have poor loyalty to customers! All they had to do is update s advance to jb instead of creating nearly the exact same phone, calling it s3 and ripping everyone off in the process!

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 19:22
  • 39x}

mini specs with huge price.... overconfidence or just plain stupid..

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 19:19
  • tUn4

Omg !

I want it so bad!!!!!!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 19:14
  • Pa7M

what the f_-_-!guys the MINI version is not much less than s3 in price.They should have launched it between 15 to 20k,then it would have burnt the market!

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 19:09
  • uvf5

another plastic fantastic samsung

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 18:43
  • 03gX

why is this even called SIII mini? it's got nothing in common! when I first heard about it I thought it would be the SIII powerhouse in a smaller form. ok if some specs were here n there but this is pathetic. I seriously hope they don't call it SIII mini n tarnish the SIII name. it's not even worth to be called sii mini! and at that price?

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 18:42
  • PAXp

the upper left font panel looks like sony ericsson live with walkman............

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 18:41
  • t7Xh

Last year specs and overpriced.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 18:40
  • ajUu

Looks like a white Nexus S with hardware key and no curved glass...

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 18:36
  • kLXZ

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-10-10 16:37 from YPb1 - click to readYeeah! Guys never forget SGS 2 is the best smartphone of 2011. I think its a mini version of original galaxy s(2010). Its galaxy s "mini" ?

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 18:32
  • fxHY

> In reply to z4520ft @ 2012-10-10 17:18 from IV{q - click to readSony xperia sola is good at cpu but worst than ever in battery. Whatever, hope mini wil support USB hosting and 720p video recording plus good codec support.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 18:28
  • fxHY

> In reply to Masia @ 2012-10-10 18:14 from 7qy9 - click to readGreat device dude. Ur trolling wont stop real buyers.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 18:26
  • fxHY

That wasn't impressive, actually Samsung has various devices with this similar specification... But why this specification??? Or just releases for lady's preference!

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 18:25
  • wYMN

agreed

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 18:17
  • xSZZ

What on earth... Is this!???
Why,,, if it's a galaxy s3's sibling.. Then y on earth this mediocre specs...
Honestly uninspiring with the screen.. Hope it turns out to be an hd display...
Then we can forgive about its 5mp camera..

Hope this specs are bias.. Nd let d new champ breath more proper flagship status....

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 18:14
  • 7qy9

The S2 is better than this. It has a cheaper price, better CPU and better camera. The rest of the specs are about the same. The only difference is the newer-ish shape.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-10 18:05
  • x8xF

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.