Nokia is now more “beautiful to use”
- Anonymous
- Report
@Wonderkid: You are aware that the LG Secret will cost over 2 times as much as the 6600 Slide or almost 3 times as much as the 3600 Slide?
Not to mention the 3G iPhone, which will be much more expensive than any of the mentioned phones.
If you want to compare, at least do so within the same price class, huh?
- Reply
- 2008-04-28 16:46
- nydq
- marboed
- Report
i think i've seen that kind of model, especially the 3600 slide looks like siemens mobile phone (forget the series), but it's wasteless since the market nowadays not only see for phone looks, but also what's inside the phone...
the great things that nokia can do is to launch a windows mobile base phone, since i love the windows mobile flexibility n feature very much...
but when Nokia? hehehe....
- Reply
- 2008-04-28 16:39
- uEx7
- Craig
- Report
@Wonderkid, lol. Um, appeal to the ladies? I'm most definitely getting that phone. That is NOT a "ladies" phone, heh.
- Reply
- 2008-04-28 16:31
- NEI4
- Packo
- Report
why 6600? why repeat de number? the number of the legendary 6600?
- Reply
- 2008-04-28 16:26
- Lrc4
- Wonderkid
- Report
The flip phone will appeal to the ladies, but to be frank, the new LG Secret not only looks great but has a good spec for a fashion phone. (VGA video, 5mp auto focus camera, touch screen, document reader etc). Plus, if it's anything like their new KF700 that is built like a tank (I have used one), then the Secret will be reliable too. These Nokias appear to be fashion phones, without a spec to match. LG Secret or 3G iPhone for me, unless Nokia come up with something that really does it all well. N96 only hope to date.
- Reply
- 2008-04-28 16:22
- mXTh
- James
- Report
just S40???
Why do Nokia bother to make a pleasant phone if they don`t apply on it the S60?
These days one has to have more than just a "pretty face".
I would buy one of these but only if they were also "smart"
- Reply
- 2008-04-28 16:09
- m}9@
- Anonymous
- Report
'beautiful to use'? how can something be 'beautiful to use'? very poor grammar by Nokia...
- Reply
- 2008-04-28 16:00
- mc3t
- Anonymous
- Report
they r beautiful phs. but functions are not impressive, especially, I like 6600 fold but 2 mega cam is disappointing.
- Reply
- 2008-04-28 15:57
- TIEh
- annoymous
- Report
donnie, have some life.
for all nokia products, you praise.
other than that, you type rubbish for other products.
again, have some life.
- Reply
- 2008-04-28 15:55
- PFM2
- jg
- Report
hummm now we're beggining to have something eye-popping from nokia
- Reply
- 2008-04-28 15:53
- PfsK
- Anonymous
- Report
Nice looking phones, but I wouldn't touch S40 ever again.
- Reply
- 2008-04-28 15:31
- Tr8a
- Pavl
- Report
I think all 3 phones are AWFUL. Absolutely. The clamshell looks like a cdma modem, and both sliders are rip-offs from old Siemens(not sure) models. With this design no functions can save them. Imho.
P.s. But I liked the 5220 alot. So, Nokia isn't all bad for me.
- Reply
- 2008-04-28 14:50
- pRU}
- andry
- Report
beautiful indeed.
IMO, they shouldn't named as 6600, since people will mistake them for the original Nokia 6600, a candybar phone that became hit few years ago...
- Reply
- 2008-04-28 14:40
- PB1{
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
Latest news
- Philips X800 gets a hands-on preview, seems chubby
- Samsung i740 surfaces, WinMo Pro and GPS on board
- New Motorola ZN200 and W231 get official, third phone spotted at FCC
- iPhone 3G does the math stateside, no contract version gets price tag too
- Is there a Walkman do-re-mi in Sony Ericsson Remi?
- Nokia Supernova 7610, 7510, 7310 and 7210 get officially announced
- Samsung J800 Luxe, L700 and L870 caught live
RSS feed