News - Reader comments

4-inch Samsung Galaxy S III mini officially unveiled

11 October, 2012 | Read the news | Post your comment
4-inch Samsung Galaxy S III mini officially unveiled - read the full textNo, we didn’t scale the images wrong, it's the new Samsung I8190 Galaxy S III mini that was just announced in Germany. Brought on by an increasing demand for 4" droids with good specs, the S III mini wants to please people who find the 4.8" screen of its big brother to be just too big. Bearing...

 

Sort by:

If it has 8MP camera, it may have some fans, go for s2

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:16
  • KSfs

almost same spics as Xperia U or P even Xperia P has a better cam, so what is it so special about this phone?? the name??

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:16
  • fq1t

Fail for Samsung. Looks like they've forgot to publish this phone back in 2010 and just a week ago they've remembered to do it.
Poor spec, high price. If it would have same what S3 has, it would be worth buying.
Sad...

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:07
  • 0FV3

370 euro for that little piece of plastic? People might aswell buy an SII for that price, that has much better specs and is only a little bigger and much slimmer.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:06
  • Ss@i

if I add $70 more in $480 I can buy real galaxy s3 in my country price what a ultra expensive device only brainwash will buy this with this price tag

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:02
  • uZa{

Most people don't like the size of the screen on the full-size Galaxy S III, and NO ONE really needs better internal specs.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 20:01
  • dQqm

A repackaged Galaxy. No innovation here.

The Galaxy name means little now, I hate telling friends what phone I have, when I have to talk like a nerd.

What phone? Oh, it's the Samsung Galaxy S Two.

Why

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:59
  • sXDm

come on, Samsung. what kind of specs are these? Motorola Razr M is physically smaller in size even, but has a 4.3in screen, faster processor at 1.5Ghz, and better camera able to record at 1080p.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:53
  • 5Er6

> In reply to Pritam Das @ 2012-10-11 19:32 from t1$A - click to readThats Interesting!

You actually did wait for the S3 Mini to confirm your decision of iPh 5. lol

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:50
  • wd8C

My Galaxy S i9000 still seems adequate powered.The Galaxy s I9000's Graphic card puts most of these so called superphones to shame.Samsung is having the cake fooling people and so is with apple and other manufacturers.Now it is for the customers to act smart and understand the diplomacy.Samsung though has the best phones with the best displays ie Super Amoled.But now it has started behaving like Apple.Every year they r raising prices of their flagship phones and they are able to charge these premiums seeing the hype their past flagships have created.Seeing the current scenario,it wont be a shock if couple of years down the line these so called flagships will be priced in lakhs.So u never know in 2016 Samsung launches Galaxy s7 at 1.7 lakhs.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:48
  • vGei

> In reply to MeeGo Takeover @ 2012-10-11 19:17 from RbXn - click to readPricing is the crucial factor for this phone, Price this phone properly and it can gain some market. only selling point for now is JB and Good amount of RAM - 1 gig ( good for a midrange)

I agree , naming it as S3 Mini is misleading, thats why samsung did not build much hype around its launch.

I like the mini versions from Sony. a true mini in nature.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:44
  • wd8C

Does it have a Wolfson Audio chip, because if it does then this could replace the best music-phone ever Galaxy S because "supercurio" can then make "Voodoo Sound" for this "S3 mini"!

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:43
  • S4nr

this phone is bad joke!

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:38
  • MZ52

now nothing is coming in my mind except for iPhone 5!! #desperate

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:32
  • t1$A

Price it around same as the s advance and may be then it'll sell decently.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:30
  • YQxK

its a lower mid end phone with not such exciting features, the 3 main things it lacks is
1) burst mode in camera,
2) very very less powered battery
3) cpu

it has a gpu, it is confirmed in official press note, but one thing i do not see in specification sheet is CORNERING GORILLA GLASS PROTECTION.
If it has gorilla glass it could be a hit if price would be in between 350 $ - 370 $.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:29
  • bJe%

Disappointing news, camera should be atleast 8MP and price around £200

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:28
  • n5yj

> In reply to BlameItOnThem @ 2012-10-11 19:08 from sRjx - click to readNokia? Who buys Nokia these days?
WP consumes more battery than Android
http://blog.gsmarena.com/nokia...ults-inside/
It has single core and 1870 mAh and scored 29h, While S2 with dual cores and 1650 mAh scored 40h
http://blog.gsmarena.com/our-s...it-did-test/

So the true battery hog is WP and not only a battery hog it also restrictive like prison with complete lack of essential games and apps

And Nokia make the worse camera ever otherwise why they did fake Lumia samples and video?
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_...ews-4769.php
http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_...ews-4765.php

And BTW Nokia is the one use cheap build quality from WP source they build their phone in Foxccon and Compal which both known for their human's right violation and low build quality
http://wmpoweruser.com/nokia-p...oxconn-also/

And WP phones are always laggy and buggy too although WP phones doesn't support multitasking i don't know they lag?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kU2JTuq1Nek
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAhWtHT_jsM

So before you open your mouth about Nokia and WP keep in mind even the lowest Android end phone with 1.6 Donut is much better than Nokia 920 or what its called now the Brick since its heavy and thick and useless like a brick

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:27
  • fqeB

im sad that i have to buy a new phone in order to have ice cream sandwich and jellybean and i have a galaxy Si9000 and i dont want roms

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:26
  • ftb}

What a rubbish my Galaxy S2 is much better than this GS3 Mini. Once my Galaxy S2 will receive Android 4.1, It will be even as powefull as the orginal Galaxy S3 is. It's even more ridiculous than Samsung overpriced it.

Moto Razr Intel, Sony, HTC are much better and cheaper than the GS3 Mini.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-11 19:24
  • rwKK

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.