News - Reader comments

Samsung I9260 Galaxy Premier GLBenchmark scores reveal GPU

22 October, 2012 | Read the news | Post your comment
Samsung I9260 Galaxy Premier GLBenchmark scores reveal GPU  - read the full textThe Samsung I9260 Galaxy Premier was once rumored as the next Galaxy Nexus phone, but those rumors were renounced. The Premier sits somewhere between the Galaxy S III and the S III mini and now we know its GPU (and most likely chipset) thanks to a GLBenchmark score. GLBenchmark reports Android...

 

Sort by:

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-10-23 13:53 from Kg{$ - click to readFirst do some Research, before you comment on anything..

  • Reply
  • 2012-11-23 07:03
  • Mf52

if it supports divx it gets my vote :)

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-23 15:19
  • sG%5

well , nice specs for a med-range device .I hope it has 2 gigs of ram .

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-23 14:19
  • iA0U

> In reply to Wil97 @ 2012-10-22 21:45 from tA$V - click to readI read the lgog review now. It wins only 5 out of 10 benchmarks. It only dominates in Linpack. How often do we play linpack? Never. And the webbrowsing benchmarks,lgog lost them all. Browsing is important coz we do it all the time. And it has no cardslot and it has old version android. Theres nothing great there, except the linpack benchmark, can anyone tell me why i need to run linpack when i am out and about? I rather insert a memory card with some new tv series episodes if i have time to spare, now i just need to know how do i do that on the lgog? Can linpack help me out here?

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-23 13:53
  • Kg{$

> In reply to Jake @ 2012-10-23 04:28 from wHTK - click to readHe said specwise so he is kinda right. Specs are good but reality is different, and the specs have one serious shortcoming, the missing card slot, so specwise its not the best phone.

I had 32GB internal plus cardslot on my phone in 2009, so how anyone could want a phone without a cardslot now when its almost 2013 beats me. They must have very modest requirements to a cellphone, and if they have modest requirements why would they demand quadcore krait and 2GB RAM and whatever?

LG fans here on gsmarena are interested only in L4 and L7. Then they pretend they like Optimus G that they cannot afford.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-23 12:20
  • Kg{$

> In reply to guyver @ 2012-10-23 00:11 from 011n - click to readhttp://sphotos-h.ak.fbcdn.net/...237097_n.jpg

I had a tipo coz my belovec Xperia Pro was lost so i bought a temporary android fone, that i used for 3 weeks while waiting for payday. What abt u, what do u have?? Nothing right?

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-23 12:13
  • Kg{$

> In reply to Nze 1 @ 2012-10-22 18:36 from HHHH - click to readI am just dropping some of my thoughts here. Way better UI? That is really subjective so UX would be a better parameter to look at. When comparing the flagship models from the two models, the Galaxy series deliver superior UX because it includes features like "smart stay," "pop up video play," etc. In aggregate, I feel like Samsung gives more values to the consumers

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-23 05:38
  • 4rPn

> In reply to Wil97 @ 2012-10-22 21:45 from tA$V - click to readA statement doesnt auto become a fact with ur declaration . It will become fact if everyone agree with it . I don agree . So , its not a fact .

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-23 04:28
  • wHTK

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-10-22 20:57 from Kg{$ - click to readI laugh at you my friend

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-23 02:39
  • KiVA

So there isn't going to be a Samsung Galaxy S II Plus with the same soc as this but 4.3" 540x960 Super AMOLED Plus display?

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-23 02:10
  • a0up

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-10-22 18:14 from Kg{$ - click to readYou don't have a note lier but you a tipo

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-23 00:11
  • 011n

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-10-22 20:58 from Kg{$ - click to readAnd hey, I don't hate Sony. Just try to stated the fact.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-22 21:53
  • tA$V

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-10-22 20:58 from Kg{$ - click to readXperia T for CA$550?

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-22 21:50
  • tA$V

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-10-22 20:57 from Kg{$ - click to readWhat a smart answer. You think Sony is Samsung's competitor? I really don't think so. Just look at the selling numbers, Samsung is WAY in front of Sony in terms of selling. In consumer interest? Just look at GSMArena's daily interest. None of all Sony's phones are in the top10 list. So what? Optimus G is currently the best smartphone (at least spec-wise) on the planet, nothing can hide that fact.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-22 21:45
  • tA$V

> In reply to Wil97 @ 2012-10-22 20:14 from tA$$ - click to readAnd, Xperia T is $550 in Canada. 1 CAD is almost exactly 1 USD.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-22 20:58
  • Kg{$

> In reply to Wil97 @ 2012-10-22 20:14 from tA$$ - click to readBecause Optimus G is a LG and LG is not a competitor to Samsung and Sony.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-22 20:57
  • Kg{$

> In reply to Tanmay @ 2012-10-22 15:42 from ut0i - click to readThere are lot of Xperia fans here. Hey, just want to say this, Xperia T is a $700 smartphone. This one is probably only around $500. Think before speak is much better than speaking without thinking. Why don't you put Optimus G instead?

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-22 20:14
  • tA$$

> In reply to Kreaninw D Unlimited @ 2012-10-22 18:37 from GThD - click to readIt's really not similar. The Note 10.1, GS3, Note 2 gpu are about 10 times faster than the one on the Xperia P. It has the same type of GPU, but it's different. Xperia P's using the single-core version with stock clock speed. GS2 using the quad-core version with stock clock speed. GS3, Note 10.1, Note 2 are using the overclocked quad-core version, and the difference is huge.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-22 20:10
  • tA$$
  • Kreaninw D Unlimited
  • Report
  • Rating0

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-10-22 18:14 from Kg{$ - click to readThanks for your honest comment. I have both Note 10.1 and Xperia P. I knew these two device come from separate world, but in term of UI, device design, and keyboard, Sony actually win here. For the hardware performance, overall smoothness, and else of use, Samsung win big time even though both have similar GPU.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-22 18:37
  • GThD

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-10-22 18:14 from Kg{$ - click to readUr right. Samsung may be a better package for now, I repeat, for the moment!, but sony is waaay more advanced in ui and customization stuff. No argument in that department. Infact, let's put it this way, sony is simply all round entertainment. LONG LIVE PLAY, LONG LIVE SONY.

  • Reply
  • 2012-10-22 18:36
  • HHHH

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.