Sony Xperia Z review: Zero hour
HTC One X+ review: The complete packageSamsung found to violate Apple patents in Holland
The Supreme Court in The Hague found Samsung guilty of infringing another of Apple's patents today.
The patent in question involves a bounce-back effect when the end of a scrollable list is reached.
Samsung had replaced the bounce-back effect on later versions of Android with a blue glow,...
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMvAltLHYzI
Now is samsung's turn haha, but they do not admit it ;P
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 10:23
- uREv
- zen
- Report
- 1
> In reply to x3ion @ 2012-11-29 08:56 from ut3J - click to readThanks for the info buddy. In the future kindly include sources so that it makes more sense. Here are some links I found:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20040549
http://www.maxconsole.com/maxc...pple-patents
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 10:17
- utbw
- GarryChen
- Report
- 0
Apple may sue god someday
Joke patents and butthurting over something that everybody will not notice who copies who
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 09:49
- tA$h
- Real Picture
- Report
- 1
Apply is crying
Oaien Oaien
Samsung has beaten apple iphone 5 by its GALAXY S3 product, which made Apple company 100 Billion USD loss,
lolz
Now Apple is about to bankrupt.
Apple was only stand because of STEVE JOB.
Iphone 5 is the big failure for Apple..
Apple should enhance their product quality and specification instead of CRYING.
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 09:42
- u1tD
- x3ion
- Report
- 1
The US Patent and Trademark Office has ruled that 20 patents relating to scroll technology "lack novelty".That includes the bounce back feature as well.
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 08:56
- ut3J
- the man
- Report
- 0
Man,its business...lets say you take your own picture with your own skill and publish it.then someone you dont know ACT what you did.you will not satisfied\dislike isn't it?
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 08:53
- tZj9
- the_seba
- Report
- 2
Jesus tap-dancing Christ! Who the hell issues a patent for a bounce back "effect" in the first place? So we can patent pretty much anything now, right? I have an idea: you guys know how it gets dark after someone switches off lights at night? Well, I'm gonna patent that "effect" - from now on it can't get dark when lights are switched off, else, pay me!
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 08:50
- mN{$
- realtech
- Report
- 1
we are so thankful that apple didn’t invent the phone, just imagine if apple invented the first mobile phone... wooaaahhh all patetents are being sued to all those companies dare to make mobile phones..
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 08:13
- t7X2
- M-i20
- Report
- 0
Of course, everything related to Apple is ridiculous! Crapple didn't develop the basic cellular telecommunications technologies upon which smartphones are based. They copied everything in the first place!! How earth can they patent stuff which has been around since the beginning of time - like rounded corners?? Crapple started this insanity, because they cannot compete any more. I wonder who they are going to sue for the ugly scratches and chipping all over there brand new phones. Just about very review out there are saying i5 is without a doubt the best hardware to reach the market this year in terms of DESIGN, ENGINEERING, and MANUFACTURE. The time is rapidly approaching when the brainwashed Crapple Zombies are going to see the light and Crapple will be exposed for whet they really are - greedy pigs..
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 08:11
- N9@y
- Fade.
- Report
- 0
Patent on a bounce-back effect? I don't know the exact date Apple Put it in their software, if it was there from the very start(first iPhone) or not. But I remember using a older Nokia S60 phone(5800 xm) having a bounce-back effect right from the start. Like in the end of phonebook. So why did nobody react to it back then? Did Nobody have a patent like that?
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 07:58
- S26H
- kill-for-exclusivity
- Report
- 0
> In reply to [deleted post]this is Sparta
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 07:27
- vI1h
- Nix
- Report
- 0
Wasn't this patent invalidated???
http://www.gsmarena.com/apples...ews-4985.php
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 07:27
- PSMD
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Denzo @ 2012-11-29 06:15 from sy9x - click to readPatent is very powerful.
Even if you are creative, you come out with the same idea WITHOUT copying, You are still infringing..
In the fast pace of software, where ideas can be build upon ideas, its is very limiting on creativity.
Thats why. Its not iLogic or android fan or apple fan .. its a deadly weapon for any software company.
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 06:27
- uREv
- james
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-11-29 05:15 from tA$4 - click to readexactly right
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 06:25
- Mf5j
- Patent need change
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Jitender Dogra @ 2012-11-29 06:09 from 2Ti4 - click to readThe shape patent is also very silly in fact.. Both are made of different materials..
So if i bake a cake.. and it look like a iphone. means i am getting sued?
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 06:18
- uREv
- Denzo
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-11-29 04:33 from uREv - click to readhinders creativity? the whole point is to come up with your own ideas!! How does that stop people from being creative!! HAHA another crazy android fan which need more iLogic and LESS copying ideas.
See what happened, you copied what all the other android fans say, misinterpreted it, and have now made a good idea into a bad one. What a great example of innovation gone wrong!
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 06:15
- sy9x
- Jitender Dogra
- Report
- 1
The patent infringement stating that some Samsung phones are look alikes of apple is obviously correct, and I support apple whole heartedly for it.
But getting things like swipe to unlock, and now bounce back effect patented sounds pretty pathetic to me. you can easily have the bounce back effect with any launcher. e.g. take ADW Launcher or Go Launcher. I wonder why such patents are even issued.
- Reply
- 2012-11-29 06:09
- 2Ti4
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
Login with
Facebook
Google
Sign up