Samsung U800 Soul b strengthens the Soul lineup
- Seby
- Report
bouth phones are very good
what do you want from samsung and nokia?
- Reply
- 2008-05-30 13:13
- M@T2
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to Mustafa @ 2008-05-29 21:11 from FvXsSeems like you don't know the specs or whatever. 6500 classic is also metal body with the SAME 2.0" screen while you says U800 is MUCH bigger. Just a fanboy :)
Ans keep it in mind 6500 was announced in May 2007 and it is selling since autumn 2007 and what the time is now? Right, May 2008. Samsung is ONE YEAR LATE with absolutely same specs except camera, it had to be better since 6500 classic is one year old and soon its successor should come.
- Reply
- 2008-05-30 12:15
- ps}x
- Anonymous
- Report
Samsung well done! Great job with the design, I really like the back of the phone. It's just simply simplicity.
- Reply
- 2008-05-30 11:58
- uBEr
- Anonymous
- Report
QCIF video at 15 fps ? Hahahahahaha !!!! My samsung from 4 years can do CIF at 18fps. Wake up Samsung , new models should be better, not worse.
- Reply
- 2008-05-30 00:08
- mDLe
- Anonymous
- Report
i love samsungs and all, but they really gotta start making quad-band phones.......
- Reply
- 2008-05-29 23:33
- Qh6R
- Anonymous
- Report
ok i hope i'm not posting anything negative but i have to say this, First Symbian which nokia pretty much had first than the Dual slider form factor which nokia created on the N95, than a complete N95 competitor the G810 which was bacicly N95 in Ironman's suit and than the l870 which looks like a direct E66 rival with 3mp and now a 6500 rival? look i know i might seem like i hate samsung, i don't these are real facts so please don't delete my post everyone is allowed to speak i have not said anything bad or used bad words just stated whats happening
- Reply
- 2008-05-29 23:30
- 04%s
- Anonymous
- Report
gsmarena is the most professional forum:D
know the standard of the phone that only can compare with 1st phone factory from being compare with those ***CHEAP***,***SMALL***,***MINY***
Factory,
Great Job GSMArena!
- Reply
- 2008-05-29 22:09
- wc64
- Anonymous
- Report
1st Nokia
2nd Samsung
3rd Motorola
shame on those people...donno how to calculate the number...poor people...
- Reply
- 2008-05-29 22:05
- wc64
- Anonymous
- Report
comparing a 2nd phone factory to a 5th factory...the people starting get CRAZY!!!wan compare with 2nd? Srry 5th factory is tooooooo small!!
- Reply
- 2008-05-29 22:00
- wc64
- Seby
- Report
It's a posibility. . . ps: from what country are u anonymous? I'm from roumania
- Reply
- 2008-05-29 21:53
- M@Ti
- Seby
- Report
The SE w890i suport multitasking and the samsung don't... It has a slim body like samsung and 3mpx camera , and 3G ...
- Reply
- 2008-05-29 21:43
- M@Ti
- Mustafa
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-05-29 20:22 from keMZ"Hardly" better than the 6500 classic? The camera is better. The body is made out of metal instead of cheap plastic. It's a Samsung, so the audio quality is better. The screen is MUCH bigger than the 6500's, and the keypad is way better than the 6500's as well. Sometimes it's not about the different SPECS. Any phone can look amazing when you check out the specs, but it isn't until you actually use the phone that you see how good it'll be in your daily life. The form factor of the SoulB looks fantastic, much better than the 6500.
- Reply
- 2008-05-29 21:11
- FvXs
- Anonymous
- Report
how can people even compare this phone which just came out of production to a nokia 6500 which was introduced a year ago? this phone hardly has any advantage over the 6500 if you look at the specs, just the camera that's better and you will be able to make video calls. but again, 6500 was a year ago and video calling wasn't as popular as it is now. and c'mon, it's time to make a quad band now.
- Reply
- 2008-05-29 20:22
- keMZ
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed