Hello can anyone help me to get the battery for sharp aqous phone model SH930w am really in need of it this is my email email@example.com
janepingol, 17 Jan 2015Hi just want to ask if you have an available battery for sharp aquos sh930w model. I really ne... moreSame here... Please if anyone knows where to buy a battery, let us know. thanks
Hi just want to ask if you have an available battery for sharp aquos sh930w model. I really need one. Please respond asap with the price if you have. Thanks and God bless.
i love this phone very much because am the first to see and touch here in cameroon
i love this aquos phone very nuch, hope sharp will give me one sample celphone, tnx management... im from the philippines
Nice phone in my opinion I think the phone will sufficient enough for the battery but this will determine for the dual core krait can it handle the screen and performs well.
KDJ, 18 Dec 2012Where 2 Buy this Phone ? I need a linkhttp://www.sotmarket.ru/produc...w.html?ref=7
Look nice! definitely look better than ubiquitious overrated Galaxy phones
Jim, 17 Dec 2012This phone is available in Hong Kong & Taiwan this month! Pricing around US$540.You don't have VAT. $540 + 18% of VAT + 5% of import duty = $669 or 516 euro. So, it just slightly more expensive than in Hong Kong.
This phone is available in Hong Kong & Taiwan this month! Pricing around US$540.
Look pretty for being 5" phone. But with dual cores 1.5 men, they need to change it to quad cores S4 pro and 2500mah battery at least then it will be perfect.
Anonymous, 17 Dec 2012and whom might be providing those htc butterfly's displays?:)I'm not sure about the "beauty" of both screens, but the IGZO tech on the Aquos' display is much more power efficient tahn the LCD3 on the Butterfly.
The Butterfly is an overall better device, but you can expect battery life on the Aquos to be much longer. To each their own.
von, 17 Dec 2012Spec wise its Sharp alright. BUT design wise Sharp could do so much better!!!!!!!!! It looks cool to me.
von, 17 Dec 2012Spec wise its Sharp alright. BUT design wise Sharp could do so much better!!!!!!!!! amin