News - Reader comments

Apple-Samsung patent ruling to be reviewed by the ITC

24 January, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Apple-Samsung patent ruling to be reviewed by the ITC - read the full textThe US International Trade Commission will review ruling, which could lead to an import ban on few devices from Samsung. The ITC will be reviewing the preliminary ruling, which found the Samsung smartphones and few tablets breaching upon the four patents held by Apple. The final verdict on...


Sort by:

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-01-25 08:01 from AT@@ - click to readThats all they did in the first place. ALl jobs was to the company was a very gifted thief. Worst of all he openly admits this, but somehow nobody believes it

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-26 07:49
  • 4QSR

> In reply to Nav @ 2013-01-25 08:59 from dUKe - click to readVery true my friend theres no more innovation here at apple. it just seems so much the same with an i fone 4 4s and 5 in terms of usage jus a few minor changes in a couple of years. so wats the point arguing over it apple fan boys. i am personally ashamed to call myself an apple boy (thats what my peers we call ourselves) coz i regret buying the i fone 5. shudve actually gone for the note 2.

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-26 01:52
  • XNtq

> In reply to Jesus @ 2013-01-25 05:15 from jS3Y - click to readIt wud certainly be a better idea coz i know what i paid to get the i fone 5 for myself and seriously its not worth it. on the other hand i gifted my sis a note 2 and theres a million things that she can do on her fone compared to my i fone. simply a waste of money and time. i bet a nokia asha wud have been a better choice.

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-26 01:41
  • XNtq

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-01-25 05:03 from vxrD - click to readBah wrong answer

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-26 01:05
  • tAR2

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-01-24 22:27 from Rn6R - click to readYes this is right Apple invented and came up some unique ideas until Iphone 4. But after that they only focused how to make money. They have stopped bringing any innovation to market. I am not a big fan of Samsung but, the truth is, Samsung is bringing innovations to market, and apple just buy all things from other companies (most of them from Samsung) and sell his phone for 1000 dollars.

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-25 08:59
  • dUKe

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-01-24 22:27 from Rn6R - click to readU jst lack common sense samsung advances every yr dey even produce hardware 4 apple go get a samsung galaxy s3 compare wit iphone 5 look anything dat sammy copied yet look which is best n smarter of both. After dat shut ur big mouth

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-25 08:10
  • ftVg

Since Jobs died,All that Apple is doing to their devices is either making the iPhone bigger or making the iPad smaller.They have nothing innovative left.

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-25 08:01
  • AT@@

nokia: connecting people
apple: suing people

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-25 07:43
  • 9xBZ

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-01-24 22:27 from Rn6R - click to readIm confused why Apple is in legal battle when Samsung just makes monile hardware and android, or "google" makes samsungs OS? Shouldnt Google and Apple be going in court? Samsung was just smart enough to make a million different aandroid operating mobile devices across the entIre spectrum; from, cheap single core phone to powerful quadcore phones. Apple should have used a "Samsung quadcore cpu than a dualcore "Samsung cpu. Lol. Thats the irony. Apple uses Samsung computer chips in apple phones. Apple is just jealous Samsung found the correct niche in market. Providing an android or "google based OS in a phone for rookie cell phone users and veteran smart phone "gurus". By the way i am using an apple iphone 4s to type this. Lol. Im looking forward to switching to android or "google" soon.... Lol

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-25 05:15
  • jS3Y

Well samung started it all, they were the first to sue apple. Now its apples turn.

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-25 05:03
  • vxrD

If u sitting an exam. Do u answer the question get from the subject by mix innovative change. Then u r a copy cat to base fact. That the point of life.

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-25 05:02
  • 2ICu

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-01-25 02:42 from j2LS - click to readhe is a typical ignorant apple fanboy. probably haven't heard how apple copied the clock of a train station and apple being found guilty of infringing some mobilemedia patents. almost everybody copies others. maybe wrong, but not something to totally go ballistic about. don't we all copy what we learned? patents are somewhat stupid. especially patents on medicines needed by the poor.

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-25 04:57
  • 9xB@

Google should have patented the notification bar in Android which was copied by the fruit company in the mobile devices since ios 5.

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-25 04:29
  • PS6Y

Scamsung addresser:

you comment nothing but full of crAPPLE! you are contradicting between competition and patent.
So what if Apple makes ipad, iphone or whatever 'i' they make. Who cares who made what first. Even other company can easily MAKE those thing. I used the word 'make' coz you only commented about Apple 'made' this and that.

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-25 03:37
  • IajH

Apple has a history of claiming that designs are unique to their product, even though other features have existed before their own implementation. For example, the feature to stop calls, messages and notifications with a click of a button that they have been advertising in Australia like crazy...

Apple really is a joke of a company and their innovation died with Steve Jobs... If you can call what he did innovation.

Hopefully Samsung are free to produce non-unique features to their products by the ITC. Silly Apple and their silly hipster / clueless technology users.

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-25 02:54
  • iifG

the ruling will favour apple coz its their home company and not samsung coz they are from korea. it dosnt really matter which korea but usa isnt in good terms with them and mainly the reason why. secondly they dont want any1 else to dominate the market than their own home boys. no wonder they didnt favour nokia aswell. its just like general motors no one else can do well there. they just cant take competition man crapple are just a bunch of loosers who cant do serious business without dropping someone out. why dont they sack china for making copies of their own fone and why only samsung. thats coz they are very well aware they will lose their complete manpower if they were to do so. hence its better to call them crapple rather apple as they only sell half the apple for the price of 10.

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-25 02:53
  • XNtq

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-01-24 22:27 from Rn6R - click to readtake a look at Samsung's Transparent AMOLED display it's amazing. most of their products are amazing and well ahead of the others. they are a very large company so how can you say that? lol

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-25 02:42
  • j2LS

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-01-24 22:27 from Rn6R - click to readWell all other company make phone and then tablets...
They all copies?

So these 6 years are iPhone and then iPad only?
And iOS is the world's only mobile OS?

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-25 01:25
  • vMeL

> In reply to kall @ 2013-01-24 16:51 from 0kIv - click to readis Sammy copying Apple products..?
duhh look at d history and you'll know who are d pioneers regarding these stupid patents given by APPLE'S home-US to them!!

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-25 01:16
  • wHrS

WOW! It's like I'm watching a TV series, with no clear protagonist. Stay tuned for the next episode teaser...

  • Reply
  • 2013-01-25 01:12
  • 9Lb2

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.