News - Reader comments

Alleged Galaxy S IV camera samples surface on Google+

07 February, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Alleged Galaxy S IV camera samples surface on Google+ - read the full textThe Samsung Galaxy S IV remain as elusive as ever, but this time we get a glimpse of some camera samples, which were accidentally uploaded on Google+. One of the photos shows a Samsung branded desk calendar, so chances are, these are coming straight from Samsung's HQ (or more probably some...

 

Sort by:

> In reply to Yasser1337 @ 2013-02-08 00:50 from fkVx - click to readYou should update yourself.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-08 00:56
  • H4wV

According to pocketnow.com,the gs3 is 1 of the best camera phones on the market.And if you read gsmarena's reviee of the lumia 920,you will see that the lumia's camera is nothing special when it comes to still shots and the gs3 actually take clearer shota,maybe it got the edge in video stabilization but that is about it.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-08 00:50
  • fkVx

When I hear "accidentally", it's for sure that those pictures were uploaded well known.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-07 23:58
  • nDZC

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-02-07 23:14 from Rn6R - click to readI agree with the Nokia part. And since Sony's, Samsung and Apple's flagships all use Sony's sensors and so-so quality lenses and flashes, I'd say Sony could bump up a little their own sensors. However the quality of the images produced by the Xperia S or T, the iPhone 4S or 5 and the Galaxy S2 or S3 is dubiously different, if at all. Maybe the Xperia T could take some credit for the high pixel count. And none of those produce images as great as the Purview 808 or even the N8.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-07 23:35
  • Ps}b

This info is totally waste of time... it's better to wait and put some REAL information, than to put this stuff that no one needs =\ Everyone knows samsung will never put 6Mpix camera to SGS IV so why you posting it -.-

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-07 23:35
  • pvsH

Something is wrong, see EXIF:

Filename - 20130206_180048.jpg
ImageWidth - 640
ImageLength - 480
Make - SAMSUNG
Model - SPH-M840
Orientation - Right top
XResolution - 72
YResolution - 72
ResolutionUnit - Inch
Software - M840VPAMB1
DateTime - 2013:02:06 18:00:47
YCbCrPositioning - Centered
ExifOffset - 246
ExposureTime - 1/40 seconds
FNumber - 2.60
ExposureProgram - Aperture priority
ISOSpeedRatings - 100
ExifVersion - 0220
DateTimeOriginal - 2013:02:06 18:00:47
DateTimeDigitized - 2013:02:06 18:00:47
ComponentsConfiguration - YCbCr
ShutterSpeedValue - 1/40 seconds
ApertureValue - F 2.60
ExposureBiasValue - 0.00
MaxApertureValue - F 2.60
MeteringMode - Center weighted average
Flash - Not fired
FocalLength - 3.55 mm
UserComment - User comments
FlashPixVersion - 0100
ColorSpace - sRGB
ExifImageWidth - 640
ExifImageHeight - 480
InteroperabilityOffset - 768
ExposureMode - Auto
White Balance - Auto
SceneCaptureType - Standard

GPS information: -
GPSVersionID - 2.2.0.0

Maker Note (Vendor): -

Thumbnail: -
ImageWidth - 512
ImageLength - 384
Compression - 6 (JPG)
Orientation - Right top
XResolution - 72
YResolution - 72
ResolutionUnit - Inch
JpegIFOffset - 946
JpegIFByteCount - 14887

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-07 23:32
  • Lfwn

Waste of a post.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-07 23:20
  • m5DW

what a ridiculous post.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-07 23:16
  • N}Yk

samsungs got some catching up to do. The quality of their camera's have been sub par compared to to apple, nokia and sony's.

Build quality is not as good as apple's , NOkia's or HTC's.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-07 23:14
  • Rn6R
Sort by:

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.