News - Reader comments

Micromax A116 Canvas HD sales will start on February 14

08 February, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Micromax A116 Canvas HD sales will start on February 14 - read the full textMicromax A116 Canvas HD, the successor of the popular Micromax A110 will be hitting shelves on February 14, according to the company. The Micromax A116 Canvas HD will be up for grabs from its official website. Micromax A116 Canvas HD carries a very attractive price tag of INR15,000 (about...

 

Sort by:

15,000k is too more for this phone, price should be 12000k.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-11 06:02
  • 2WdF

guys dont go with these indian people saying mmx experience is decent.. Wat u find decent is ur own standard u set...they even consider galaxy ace,s duos quality as decent by their standard

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-11 05:27
  • PAXp

> In reply to DK @ 2013-02-10 11:29 from rASr - click to readits not specs in paper but da quality of specs that matter..using mtk quad chip which is nowhere near dual core krait nd battery consuming (despite being CA7)...nd chinese open market available phone is not worth Irs 15k...at most 12k

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-11 05:11
  • PAXp

nice look with slim body

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-11 03:25
  • tUdx

this phone is a jok. too much money for unbranded brand

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-10 23:43
  • 6{cJ

micromax never come with single sim slot mobile thats where they making big mistake.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-10 23:38
  • KFNw

Rs 15000 is very cheap for a good smartphone. But Rs 15000 is costly for a chinese/indian phone with zero after sales support. If canvasHD is priced Rs12000 then we will have a serious competition with the likes of Samsung dual sim phones. Moreover i believe it is Micromax that makes this phone pricey, if the same exact phone comes with a chinese name it will cost about Rs. 10000.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-10 23:13
  • rKG$

On paper this is a good phone, but current experience with canvas 2 is very bad. Touchscreen doesn't work while charging with the charger or through usb from the computer. Better buy a bit costlier phone from a reliable manufacturer.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-10 22:54
  • YQVQ

> In reply to I.D.G.A.F.O.S. @ 2013-02-10 12:45 from 8Dc2 - click to readseems u really wealthy cant u check the prices before comparing things dude

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-10 20:37
  • IaH5

Eagerly waiting,nice phone but 15k is more than enough for mmx. Because of it's bad after sales service...

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-10 19:37
  • uwWq

i am very eagerness to buy this phone because it can confront to any other smartphone who are catch indian market right now

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-10 19:07
  • 2@cF

i am waiting for canvas hd.
i already have canvas a110 which is also a very good phone.

micromax rocks

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-10 18:34
  • tUp%

I am going to be one of the first to get my hands on.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-10 17:22
  • vI1@

> In reply to Laksx @ 2013-02-10 13:48 from 2@fe - click to readcompletely agree with you. Indian brands rocks

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-10 16:51
  • vb$b

i am supporting micromax

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-10 16:40
  • tA{C

ya its a good one but they can improve there camera quality...oike sony ....moto....and samsung....

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-10 13:52
  • vGjX

its good .... a indian brand is kicking ass of some videshi brands.. we should support our brands..

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-10 13:48
  • 2@fe

this is nonsense. no specs leaked. no offense but indian people dont know about publicity and i guess they only afford the mediatek 1.2 ghz quad core chipset chinese made.. and still hd dp? . wheres the full hd. always runnin behin

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-10 12:45
  • 8Dc2

> In reply to i luv india @ 2013-02-10 11:10 from utxq - click to readlol!
Hungry OS, Android is one of the smartest OS. You can save your battery if you are smart enough. Background apps eats battery. Critics are doing their job, I have used Canvas 2 for more than 3 months, no issue with the performance-it was flawless ICS experience. Now eagerly waiting for Jelly bean Canvas HD.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-10 12:21
  • FMYx

Ya dears you are right that 15k is more for non Branded Comp.!! but i think you didn't c the specifications!! at this price tag None of any Branded comp.can provide d specifications. if v compare this speci. with any Branded com. you could Pay approximately 25k-35k.
so isn't matter that we should not pay 15k for this. Now MM is also being on List of Branded company.!!

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-10 11:29
  • rASr
Sort by:

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.