News - Reader comments

Android-powered Samsung Galaxy Star is in the works

20 February, 2013 | Read the news | Post your comment
Android-powered Samsung Galaxy Star is in the works - read the full textRemember Samsung's cheap featurephone Star lineup? It seems the series is getting a reboot and this time it'll be getting a proper OS. As the latest rumor has it Samsung is developing a low-end smartphone called Galaxy Star with similar specs to the Galaxy Y but running on Android Jelly...

 

Sort by:

Just too many ppl who want someone to replace Samsung from top spot. The hatred has become so intense that now nokia and sony fans have tagged along with ifans and are posting their rubbish comments allover samsung's post.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-21 06:46
  • HkXH

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-02-20 23:44 from QYn6 - click to readoh really they were reliable??????????
just come once in an indian mobile store and see how many useless nokia phones are there with real bad design and features atleast at that place samsung's low end phones are better than nokia's phones
nokia used to launch 3-4 phones with same features but different design

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-21 05:40
  • sSKZ

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-02-21 02:41 from 2mCd - click to readoh than what is apple doing with its same design and same old user interface
stop criticising samsung for similar designs
samsung just uses same design for 1 year but apple crapple is using the same design for past 5 years

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-21 05:33
  • veF5

More phone, more options. Good job samsung

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-21 05:09
  • PFKN

next samsung flugsheep on their beloved galaxy siries are milkyway, sun, earth, mars and all the planetoids arround the univers and all the latters in the alphabet to complete their beloved package.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-21 03:12
  • UNA6

Best durable = MOTOrola , HTC
Best design = NOKIA , SONY

Best show off = APPLE
Best UGLY look = hmmmmm..no need say the word anymore.
all people tired of the same uncle
"sammy" design.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-21 02:41
  • 2mCd

> In reply to TheMan @ 2013-02-20 18:34 from fqe9 - click to read... those phones were actually good and reliable..... unlike samsung here, galaxy premier, galaxy poo, galaxy crap... all the same.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-20 23:44
  • QYn6

junk phone!


*from note2 user

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-20 23:43
  • U}}A

> In reply to Damien Lord @ 2013-02-20 22:40 from tUaI - click to readI was running a race with my friend, I was a good 10-15 feet ahead of him, suddenly I stumbled upon a rock and fell, So now he is ahead of me, that doesn't mean he is the best, he just got plain lucky, but the thing is I am still running, and the race isn't over yet. I think you got the picture.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-20 23:35
  • H4qe

> In reply to TheMan @ 2013-02-20 23:07 from fqe9 - click to readI guess you are confused person, you are the one who compared S1 to Nokia 90's phones, agree with the mono screens, but crappy build.... :D :D :D. I guess you still have lot of history to learn,

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-20 23:25
  • H4qe

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2013-02-20 19:37 from 8YCk - click to readActually you are the 8 years old kid how can you compare new technology phone like SI (CPU/GPU, advanced screen) with Nokia 90's phones they only have mono screens and crappy build body. What makes those mono phones to malfunction?

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-20 23:07
  • fqe9

So many haters around!!! But it's okay, when you're on top or when you're the best, some people will hate you.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-20 22:40
  • tUaI

> In reply to TheMan @ 2013-02-20 19:26 from fqe9 - click to readNo, from the era, according to you when Nokia was spamming.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-20 19:41
  • H4wV

> In reply to TheMan @ 2013-02-20 19:26 from fqe9 - click to readCongrats that your S1 is still alive.. well, compare N3310 (2000) to S1 (2010)since we're talking about SPAMMING of handsets from NOKIA and SAMSUNG? the gap is way too long.. Mind you, even on drop test, s1 will lose. That's what TheApprentice is pointing out. :)

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-20 19:38
  • vj1N

> In reply to TheMan @ 2013-02-20 19:26 from fqe9 - click to readIf you're going to try to rebut a statement, at least read it first. 2010 does not equal the 90s. I swear the reading level of samsung fanboys is around an 8 year old's.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-20 19:37
  • 8YCk

Lol @samsung. Spam spam spam

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-20 19:30
  • UD%s

> In reply to TheApprentice @ 2013-02-20 19:09 from H4wV - click to readMy brother has S1 and still working, he bought it in April 2010, 3 years and still working no problem at all.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-20 19:26
  • fqe9

> In reply to TheMan @ 2013-02-20 18:34 from fqe9 - click to readBut at least those phones are still working rock solid, how many samsung phones of those era are still functional?

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-20 19:09
  • H4wV

Oh great more spam, more cheap material, more non upgradable phone that will become old in month or two by the same kind of spam from the same company, oh and not to forget the dual sim version spam, and let me guess, it will targeted towards India, where samsung still thinks that all India is good for is the cheap devices or the higher ends.

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-20 19:08
  • H4wV

Hurray! More Samsung Phone Spam!

  • Reply
  • 2013-02-20 18:59
  • xbS@
Sort by:

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.